Revision as of 17:43, 13 September 2006 editRobdurbar (talk | contribs)11,477 edits aign← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:04, 13 September 2006 edit undoDjln (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users279,350 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Not quite. The team is controlled by the ]. And, most importantly, they are recognsied as such by ] --] 17:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | :Not quite. The team is controlled by the ]. And, most importantly, they are recognsied as such by ] --] 17:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
With or without FIFA recognition this is still a very dubious claim. | |||
] --] 21:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:04, 13 September 2006
How can Northern Ireland claim to be the successor team ? They make up less than a third of the territory this team represented. It is a bit like Ukraine claiming to be the successor of the USSR. Djln --Djln 16:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Not quite. The team is controlled by the same football association. And, most importantly, they are recognsied as such by FIFA --Robdurbar 17:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
With or without FIFA recognition this is still a very dubious claim. Djln --Djln 21:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)