Misplaced Pages

User talk:Dhammafriend: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:46, 18 September 2006 editThegreyanomaly (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,935 edits →Revert← Previous edit Revision as of 22:19, 20 September 2006 edit undoHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →Attacks, Racism, Hatemongering and general incivilityNext edit →
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 36: Line 36:
] ]

:: Nobody can brand Buddhist by any other name. We do not have such legal system in India. Gail Omvedt is one writer so her branding is not a LAW in India. As per the legal system and recognized religions in India we have only Buddhist, Muslims, Hindus, Jains, Christens as different religions in India. As I mentioned clearly the article discusses the present status of religious Buddhist Movement in India. It do not talks about Navayana OR Old Yana.
What is neo-Buddhism?? This is an absolute foolish concepts by anti-Buddhist people. You see the All India Buddhist Monk Association; it represents all Buddhists from Assam, Ladakh, Maharashtra or other parts of India.
Where did you take your ordination as Buddhist? Just lying a religion for caste Brahmins and present SHUDRAs.
]

==Attacks, Racism, Hatemongering and general incivility==
:You have violated several wikipedia policies by making racist attacks against Hindus on ]. I am warning you once and once alone. If you persist I ''will'' report you and file a request for arbitration against you and do whatever I must to get you permabanned from wikipedia. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased edits then please STOP what you are doing and remain civil and make SOURCED edits without taking a position on the article. Then, all will be well and we can contribute meaningfully to wikipedia. Thanks] 07:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
:: Please do (not?) be so aggressive and threatening,; I agree that Dhammafriend can make quite POV edits, but please be ], Hkelkar.
:::I'm sorry if I seemed that way, but Dhammafriend made unacceptable comments on talk page of ] that demand certain users stop editing (violating ] and making religious/sectarian attacks on editors he has disputed with, violating ]).] 22:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

::Dhammafriend, making really controversial edits on Misplaced Pages will almost always get your work reverted. It would be really appreciated though if you added useful information on articles and stubs instead of annoying many users and getting your edits reverted. Thanks. ] ] 22:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


::This is your final warning. Do not characterize the motivations and religiosity of other editors on wikipedia. It is a personal attack and, what's more, an ethnic slur.If you persist in these types of attacks you will be reported the next time. Please focus on constructive and SOURCED edits per ] and ]. Also read ], specifically the soapbox and battleground parts.

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against ]. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be ] from editing by administrators or ] by the ]. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please ] appropriately. Thank you. <!-- Template:Npa3 -->

This is regarding this diff on my talk page .

] 22:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, 20 September 2006

Revival Of Buddhism In India

Welcome to Misplaced Pages

Hi! welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hope you enjoy contributing to Misplaced Pages. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Misplaced Pages. Drop us a note at Misplaced Pages:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk

Revert

Naturally, if you really think that the article has been made worse, you can revert it. It is sometimes preferable to discuss on the talk page first. Also, if it reaches a point where both of you are reverting each other, then you really must discuss the problem, because there is no other solution.—Nat Krause 16:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Indian Buddhist Movement

Umm... I'm an EX-Brahmin who converted to Theravada Buddhism... I edited Navayāna into the article because in Buddhism in India : Challenging Brahmanism and Caste by Gail Omvedt (This book is incredibly anti-Caste and is pro-Buddhist) I have read Neo-Buddhism being referred to as Navayana, which is is obviously a non-IAST transliteration of navayāna.

"Ambedkar's Buddhism seemingly differs from that of those who accepted by faith, who 'go for refuge' and accept the canon. This This much is clear from its basis: it does not accept in totality the scriptures of the Theravada, the the Mahayana, or the Vajrayana. The question that is then clearly put forth: is a fourth yana, a Navayana, a kind of modernistic Enlightenment version of the Dhamma really possible within the framework of Buddhism?" (8)

The book blatantly says that Ambedkar DESIGNED what has become known as navayāna. He did not found the Navayana publishing house. I edited in that there is a Navayana publishing house into the article so people would not confuse, navayāna, yāna, and Navayana, the publishing house.


I'm going to put the navayāna comment back into Indian Buddhist Movement. Please do not edit it out again. Navayāna is an accepted name of neo-Buddhism.

Peace, TheGreyAnomaly

User_talk:Thegreyanomal

Nobody can brand Buddhist by any other name. We do not have such legal system in India. Gail Omvedt is one writer so her branding is not a LAW in India. As per the legal system and recognized religions in India we have only Buddhist, Muslims, Hindus, Jains, Christens as different religions in India. As I mentioned clearly the article discusses the present status of religious Buddhist Movement in India. It do not talks about Navayana OR Old Yana.

What is neo-Buddhism?? This is an absolute foolish concepts by anti-Buddhist people. You see the All India Buddhist Monk Association; it represents all Buddhists from Assam, Ladakh, Maharashtra or other parts of India. Where did you take your ordination as Buddhist? Just lying a religion for caste Brahmins and present SHUDRAs. Dhammafriend

Attacks, Racism, Hatemongering and general incivility

You have violated several wikipedia policies by making racist attacks against Hindus on Talk:Indian Buddhist Movement. I am warning you once and once alone. If you persist I will report you and file a request for arbitration against you and do whatever I must to get you permabanned from wikipedia. If you wish to make neutral and unbiased edits then please STOP what you are doing and remain civil and make SOURCED edits without taking a position on the article. Then, all will be well and we can contribute meaningfully to wikipedia. ThanksHkelkar 07:37, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Please do (not?) be so aggressive and threatening,; I agree that Dhammafriend can make quite POV edits, but please be civil, Hkelkar.
I'm sorry if I seemed that way, but Dhammafriend made unacceptable comments on talk page of Talk:Indian Buddhist Movement that demand certain users stop editing (violating WP:OWN and making religious/sectarian attacks on editors he has disputed with, violating WP:NPA).Hkelkar 22:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Dhammafriend, making really controversial edits on Misplaced Pages will almost always get your work reverted. It would be really appreciated though if you added useful information on articles and stubs instead of annoying many users and getting your edits reverted. Thanks. Mar de Sin 22:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)


This is your final warning. Do not characterize the motivations and religiosity of other editors on wikipedia. It is a personal attack and, what's more, an ethnic slur.If you persist in these types of attacks you will be reported the next time. Please focus on constructive and SOURCED edits per WP:NPOV and WP:Reliable Sources. Also read Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not, specifically the soapbox and battleground parts.

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.

This is regarding this diff on my talk page here.

Hkelkar 22:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)