| Revision as of 16:04, 20 September 2006 editHkelkar (talk | contribs)7,279 edits →Islam and the Sikh panth← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:09, 21 September 2006 edit undoBakasuprman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,844 edits →Which Varna Do you belong?Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| | ] ] | | ] ] | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| ==Indian Buddhist Movement== | |||
| I read your anti-Buddhist comments on the article. It is better you concentrate on Hindu Religion, Caste System and Untouchability. That is your religion. Buddhism is a religion based on Equality, Liberty and Fraternity. It is difficult for ] ] ] people like you to understand Buddhism and its great heritage. You people are caste ridden and you have forgotten your own ]-Ashram Dharma. Understanding all religions with their good and bad sides is a good key for religious peace and harmony. Don't be anti-Buddhist Or anti-Christens because these people convert others. Better understand good and bad things of your religion before you blame others. Because of Hindu Casteism and Hindu Untouchability many oppressed people are converting to Buddhims and Christenity. ] 17:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Which Varna Do you belong?== | |||
| All so called Hindus must ask a simple question to their own heart 'Which ] they belong?' Especially as per Hindu philosophy every Hindu is a Shudra by birth and only by Karma he can change his Varna. So those who are not priests in Temples are not ]s by ], Those who are not in Military are not ] those who are not businessman are not ] so majority belongs to ] Varna. So Mr. Kelkar ] like you should understand your own religion first. Especillay this is ] so all non-priests are Shudra! What is wrong? Its a VarnaShram Dharma preached by ] and ] like ] etc. So in next birth you will certainly become Brahmin. So don't just be anti-Buddhist Or anti-Muslim understand your own religion first. Even ] mentions ] castiesm by Karma etc. Please read the book Shudras who were they? Riddles In Hinduism written by Dr. ] for more information. Be a positive contributor don't try to hide the truths. All so called Hindus are ] then its not a wrong thing. They can certainly become ] by doing good ]. That is Karma Yog by Geeta. ] 17:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Ambedkar is not an authority on Hinduism. Swami Vivekanand, Koenraad elst, etc are.] <font color = "blue"><sub>]</sub></font> 01:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Copied from my talkpage re ] == | == Copied from my talkpage re ] == | ||
Revision as of 01:09, 21 September 2006
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 20 days are automatically archived to Talk:Hkelkar/Archive 2. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
|
| 1 2 |
Indian Buddhist Movement
I read your anti-Buddhist comments on the article. It is better you concentrate on Hindu Religion, Caste System and Untouchability. That is your religion. Buddhism is a religion based on Equality, Liberty and Fraternity. It is difficult for Shudra Varna Hindu people like you to understand Buddhism and its great heritage. You people are caste ridden and you have forgotten your own Varna-Ashram Dharma. Understanding all religions with their good and bad sides is a good key for religious peace and harmony. Don't be anti-Buddhist Or anti-Christens because these people convert others. Better understand good and bad things of your religion before you blame others. Because of Hindu Casteism and Hindu Untouchability many oppressed people are converting to Buddhims and Christenity. Dhammafriend 17:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Which Varna Do you belong?
All so called Hindus must ask a simple question to their own heart 'Which Varna they belong?' Especially as per Hindu philosophy every Hindu is a Shudra by birth and only by Karma he can change his Varna. So those who are not priests in Temples are not Brahmins by Varna, Those who are not in Military are not Kshatriya those who are not businessman are not Vaishya so majority belongs to Shudra Varna. So Mr. Kelkar Shudra like you should understand your own religion first. Especillay this is Kali Yuga so all non-priests are Shudra! What is wrong? Its a VarnaShram Dharma preached by Veda and Dharmaśāstra like Manusmriti etc. So in next birth you will certainly become Brahmin. So don't just be anti-Buddhist Or anti-Muslim understand your own religion first. Even Geeta mentions Varna castiesm by Karma etc. Please read the book Shudras who were they? Riddles In Hinduism written by Dr. Ambedkar for more information. Be a positive contributor don't try to hide the truths. All so called Hindus are Shudra then its not a wrong thing. They can certainly become Brahmin by doing good Karma. That is Karma Yog by Geeta. Dhammafriend 17:34, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ambedkar is not an authority on Hinduism. Swami Vivekanand, Koenraad elst, etc are.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:09, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Copied from my talkpage re Jawaharlal Nehru
- Please regard WP:Civil and WP:NPA regading your last post to my talk page. Thanks.Hkelkar 22:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wasn't Nehru a Kashmiri Pandit? That makes him Hindu by default. I did not see any coherent arguments to suggest his athiesm (just one section in the talk page that said "search google"; I did and found no credible evidence to suggest a declaration of athiesm).I did not see any argunemts in the talk page archive either.Care to point me in the direction of any talk page argument or debate to that effect?Hkelkar 02:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- (1) Please note, in general, that henceforth the religion people were born into, especially for twentieth century figures, cannot be taken as being the religion for WP purposes unless we can cite their self-identification. (2) IF you had read the article itself, much less the talk page, you would have seen two fairly anti-religion quotes in the quotes section. If the first page of google results were not enough for you - surprising enough - try google books for explicit references. THe point is, you did neither, merely removed a long-standing element in the page without checking. (3) I fail to see how pointing this out and noting that it is something that will lead to assumptions by others about your willingness to take the time to check your edits is a violation of any WP policy. Please stop throwing all this around. Hornplease 06:38, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wasn't Nehru a Kashmiri Pandit? That makes him Hindu by default. I did not see any coherent arguments to suggest his athiesm (just one section in the talk page that said "search google"; I did and found no credible evidence to suggest a declaration of athiesm).I did not see any argunemts in the talk page archive either.Care to point me in the direction of any talk page argument or debate to that effect?Hkelkar 02:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Test Section
- Just testing for better rendering.Hkelkar 06:47, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Poverty in India
Unfortunately I have had to remove the speedy tags as it does not qualify as an attack page (nor for any CSD criteria). Your only recourse is to file an WP:AfD - sorry for the inconvenience - Glen 13:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Very well done on the Poverty in Pakistan article. BhaiSaab 05:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Indian caste system
Look at this diff from the dude writing the "Hindu cate system" stuff .Bakaman Bakatalk 00:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Hinduism as an Ethnicity
Please abstain from mentioning Hinduism as ethnicity as the literate world recognises Hinduism as religion and not as ethnicity..and wherever you mention that write also why and on whose authority do you write Hinduism as an ethnicity.TerryJ-Ho 00:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Cite sources that explicitly debunk the use of Hindu as an ethnicity.Hkelkar 03:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Godhra Train Burning
Why did you make this edit when I already pointed out that it's in the 9th paragraph? BhaiSaab 03:38, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Upanishad
Please point me to the discussion that you refer to here. — goethean ॐ 18:39, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- More discussion can take place. Please do not delete the template again. — goethean ॐ 22:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Right now i have my midsem papers. Anyways, i dont have much knowledge about the subject but i will try to help you out once my papers are over.nids(♂) 16:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Ikonoblast
Thanks for that. He's done this before, though I didn't report him then. I guess it had to stop sometime.Gamesmaster G-9 20:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Islam and the Sikh panth
Concerning the question you asked on my talk page, I will try to add as much as I can. However, I am not greatly literate on that particular topic so I will first have to do some research.
Also, I am not so sure that I have read anything on any one of Guru Gobind Singh's family members being skinned alive, although I have read about his four sons' and father's martyrdoms.
Sandeep S K 13:51, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- I believe it was his younger brother, but I'm not 100% certain. I'll try to look it up.Hkelkar 16:04, 20 September 2006 (UTC)