| Revision as of 02:33, 10 March 2017 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 edits →Were you posting about me off-wiki?← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:45, 10 March 2017 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,389 editsm →Were you posting about me off-wiki?: Huh. Apparently the Wayback Machine doesn't like message boards. I have screenshots of everything there saved offline, anyway, but it's still disappointing.Next edit → | ||
| Line 108: | Line 108: | ||
| ] (<small>]]</small>) 02:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | ] (<small>]]</small>) 02:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
| I also spent some time back when I first noticed it to figure out who posted , and I just noticed now how difficult it would be for an uninvolved party to come to a conclusion like {{tq|He also responded to Snow Rise and blamed them for Albino Ferret proposing the topic bans}} based on a removed, objective reading of the comment in question, which really makes me think that it was one of the users being discussed in that portion of the post<!-- neither of whom I'm IBANned with -->. ] (<small>]]</small>) 02:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | I also spent some time back when I first noticed it to figure out who posted , and I just noticed now how difficult it would be for an uninvolved party to come to a conclusion like {{tq|He also responded to Snow Rise and blamed them for Albino Ferret proposing the topic bans}} based on a removed, objective reading of the comment in question, which really makes me think that it was one of the users being discussed in that portion of the post<!-- neither of whom I'm IBANned with -->. ] (<small>]]</small>) 02:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:45, 10 March 2017
 Notice: I take all complaints in the form of epic rap battles. |
 |
|---|
| 24 December 2024 |
|
Please comment on Talk:Tom Brady
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tom Brady. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Julia Montes
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Julia Montes. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Richard B. Spencer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Melania Trump
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Melania Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Misplaced Pages in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Misplaced Pages
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Misplaced Pages has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
Please comment on Talk:Erika Lauren Wasilewski
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Erika Lauren Wasilewski. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
WikiProject X Newsletter • Issue 10
This month, we discuss the new CollaborationKit extension. Here's an image as a teaser:
23:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Request
I'm requesting that you please remove the parenthetical comment you made about my username at the Erika Lauren Wasilewski talk page. I'm sure you were just trying to be friendly, and that's fine, but I would appreciate it now if you would remove it. I can't imagine it's relevant to the ongoing RfC, but it does matter to me. Thanks. Levdr1lp / talk 00:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sure, I can do that. Just to be clear, though, the comment was an effort to bring to your attention, in a friendly manner, that there's something of a minor WP:UNCONF issue with your username. I don't view it as an inappropriate thing to make note of and I'm unsure why it has rubbed you the wrong way, but at the same time I have no objection to removing it, given your request. Snow 07:14, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding the "minor issue" w/ my username, was it by any chance a readability/visual accessibility issue? Something else? Two other editors just raised color contrast ratio & talk link issues at User_talk:Redrose64#Sig, and I'm in the process of addressing those concerns. Levdr1lp / talk 22:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that potential accessibility issue of the display was part of it, but I also found it somewhat compounded by the alpha-numeric combination of the name itself; I had to go back to reference your name any time I wanted to address you directly, because I couldn't remember the exact sequence of the characters and I couldn't divine any phonetic or conceptual underlay to it. So, a very minor issue indeed (even when combined with the atypical display), but I thought it was worth mentioning in passing, even so. Snow 01:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please see User:Levdr1lp/n.b. Levdr1lp / talk 02:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- As the above user subpage notes, I formerly edited as "Levdr1", but I lost my password for that account. I created a new account -- my current account -- as a replacement. That was six years ago. At first, my account name was "Levdr1lostpassword". At some point I abbreviated the name in my signature with a piped wikilink to my userpage: "Levdr1lp" ("lp" for "lostpassword"). Last March (2016), I formally requested to change my username to "Levdr1lp", and I was approved for this username change, both on the local English Misplaced Pages, and globally for all related Wikimedia sites (Commons, etc.). Technical issues aside, you're the first user to ask about my username. Basically I didn't want "password" in the name any longer. I kept the "lp" suffix for the sake of continuity since that's how my signature appeared. Hope this clarifies it. (Side note- I believe I've now addressed any accessibility issues with my signature with the new colors.) Levdr1lp / talk 06:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, I see--it must have been frustrating to lose access to your old account like that. Well, for my part, although the previous colours were not an issue for my own perception personally, I still appreciate your attention to the accessibility issue, as an editor. Snow 22:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, that potential accessibility issue of the display was part of it, but I also found it somewhat compounded by the alpha-numeric combination of the name itself; I had to go back to reference your name any time I wanted to address you directly, because I couldn't remember the exact sequence of the characters and I couldn't divine any phonetic or conceptual underlay to it. So, a very minor issue indeed (even when combined with the atypical display), but I thought it was worth mentioning in passing, even so. Snow 01:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Regarding the "minor issue" w/ my username, was it by any chance a readability/visual accessibility issue? Something else? Two other editors just raised color contrast ratio & talk link issues at User_talk:Redrose64#Sig, and I'm in the process of addressing those concerns. Levdr1lp / talk 22:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sean Spicer
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Sean Spicer. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Death of Alan Kurdi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Death of Alan Kurdi. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
RfC … still willing?
Hello, Snow Rise. Are you still willing to compose the RfC regarding lists vs. prose in film article? Reminder re what it's all about (from your archive):
A recent discussion in WP:MOSFILM concerning the difference between "Top-ten lists" versus a "summary prose" about a film's inclusion in best of year lists, and the difference between guidelines for Accolades vs. Critical response, remains unresolved.
The guidelines for the Accolades section (or separate accolades article) do not allow:
- "critics' top-ten lists on which a film appears, except on a case-by-case basis subject to consensus".
The guidelines for the Critical response section do not exclude the addition of a summary sentence about a film's inclusion in "best of year" lists.
- Example of Top-ten lists (deleted from article).
- Example of summary prose (deleted from article).
(A) Is the addition of a single sentence (i.e summary prose) about a film being named one of the best films of the year with a few reliable sources to support this information -- the same as an addition of "top-ten lists"?
(B) If there is a difference between the two: should the wording of MOSFILM guidelines be modified so as to clarify the distinction between what is a "list" and what is a "prose" -- and allow for the latter?
Relevant comment by User:AndrewOne in WP:MOSFILM discussion:
The guideline reads, "Do not add critics' top-ten lists on which a film appears, except on a case-by-case basis subject to consensus." This statement addresses the inclusion of a list itself, not of a single sentence reporting how many lists a film made. As I posted in my previous comment, "there is no uncontroversial basis in the manual of style for the removal of the sentence that Pyxis Solitary wants, but only an arguable and highly disputed basis – which is a sign that the manual's wording could be improved. When the noun of the guideline is not rankings on lists or summaries of how frequently a work appears on lists but lists themselves, the only thing that the guideline is explicitly barring, realistically speaking, is the inclusion of lists themselves. If the intent of the guideline is to ban virtually any mentioning of top 10 lists, the manual must state this in a more unambiguous way than it currently does."
Just to emphasize: I'm the editor that started the still-unresolved discussion in WP:MOSFILM and the one that would like an RfC regarding the matter. Thank you. Pyxis Solitary (talk) 11:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Were you posting about me off-wiki?
I was doing my intermittent check for bitter banned users complaining about me off-wiki (because of an email I got that informed me that "Misplaced Pages Sucks" has apparently been taken down that reminded me of an incident on Wikipediocracy a few years ago), and I found https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiInAction/comments/5q0hsc/whats_the_deal_with_hijiri88/
The original post has been deleted, but the text visible in the Google preview was The guy has a lot of flak with people, especially with and other guys. The amount of Interation bans he has seems to be a bunch...
. The date, January 25 of this year, was right in the middle of you complaining about me a bunch on ANI and talking about my IBANs (the redacted name is the user who was the subject of the ANI thread you were posting about me in), which is why I'm asking you. You are also the only one I can recall going on and on about my two interaction bans.
I admit it's entirely possible it's some random troll, or perhaps a stalker I had from years ago, so if you say it wasn't you I guess I'll accept that, but if it was you I would appreciate if you were upfront about it.
Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
I also spent some time back when I first noticed it to figure out who posted this, and I just noticed now how difficult it would be for an uninvolved party to come to a conclusion like He also responded to Snow Rise and blamed them for Albino Ferret proposing the topic bans
based on a removed, objective reading of the comment in question, which really makes me think that it was one of the users being discussed in that portion of the post. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)