Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
{{ping|No More Mr Nice Guy}} re the section you added back into the lede, it is much too much detail on the McMahon letters for an article on the Balfour Declaration. Also, the sentence "The British claimed that the McMahon letters did not apply to Palestine, therefore the Declaration could not be a violation of the previous agreement" is a poor summary of the facts - as the McMahon article says, the British originally said Palestine was included, and even when they changed their mind about "intent" the conclusion of the 1939 committee re the actual legal commitment was along the lines of "it's complicated". ] (]) 07:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
{{ping|No More Mr Nice Guy}} re the section you added back into the lede, it is much too much detail on the McMahon letters for an article on the Balfour Declaration. Also, the sentence "The British claimed that the McMahon letters did not apply to Palestine, therefore the Declaration could not be a violation of the previous agreement" is a poor summary of the facts - as the McMahon article says, the British originally said Palestine was included, and even when they changed their mind about "intent" the conclusion of the 1939 committee re the actual legal commitment was along the lines of "it's complicated". ] (]) 07:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|No More Mr Nice Guy}} please self revert. You have restored reverted text without discussion, in direct contravention of WP:ARBPIA requirements. You did not even attempt to respond to this discussion thread. ] (]) 17:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|No More Mr Nice Guy}} please self revert. You have restored reverted text without discussion, in direct contravention of WP:ARBPIA requirements. You did not even attempt to respond to this discussion thread. ] (]) 17:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
::Actually it's you who has removed longstanding consensus compromise wording, twice at this point. You are the one who restored reverted text (although kudos for waiting a couple of months for your slow edit war), and you are the one who is in violation of ARBPIA requirements. The reason I did not reply to your comment above, as you know from our dealings on other articles, is that I do not allow you to waste my time unless at least one other editor supports your position. Didn't happen in this case - neither in discussion or in article edits - but we're both used to that at this point. ] (]) 19:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Misplaced Pages. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article.
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.
Which Declaration?
I noticed when searching newspaper archives that Lord Balfour made many Declarations. The greatest number of newspaper stories emanate from his Declarations on Tariffs, especially the declaration made in 1910 Have you discussed putting a date on this, because he made so many "Declarations" that it's a bit of a joke about Lord Balfour's fondness for making them? Petedavo 06:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Only talks about two of his declarations on Palestine (there were three), but then he's most famous for his Declarations on Tarrifs prior to this. Maybe this artivle should have (Palestine) after rather than a date, and his one on Tarrifs (Tarriofs) etc? Petedavo 05:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
@No More Mr Nice Guy: re the section you added back into the lede, it is much too much detail on the McMahon letters for an article on the Balfour Declaration. Also, the sentence "The British claimed that the McMahon letters did not apply to Palestine, therefore the Declaration could not be a violation of the previous agreement" is a poor summary of the facts - as the McMahon article says, the British originally said Palestine was included, and even when they changed their mind about "intent" the conclusion of the 1939 committee re the actual legal commitment was along the lines of "it's complicated". Oncenawhile (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
@No More Mr Nice Guy: please self revert. You have restored reverted text without discussion, in direct contravention of WP:ARBPIA requirements. You did not even attempt to respond to this discussion thread. Oncenawhile (talk) 17:54, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Actually it's you who has removed longstanding consensus compromise wording, twice at this point. You are the one who restored reverted text (although kudos for waiting a couple of months for your slow edit war), and you are the one who is in violation of ARBPIA requirements. The reason I did not reply to your comment above, as you know from our dealings on other articles, is that I do not allow you to waste my time unless at least one other editor supports your position. Didn't happen in this case - neither in discussion or in article edits - but we're both used to that at this point. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:51, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
the Zionist entity
“The Arab-Israeli conflict in a wider sense ran primarily from 1948-73 but extended in a more limited manner to 2006, and finally became the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, the ongoing local conflict which also began in 1948”
@Oncenawhile: I don’t know who wrote this but Israel only has a ceasefire (still at war) with many countries and is still regularly bombing Syria/ Lebanon and occasionally Sudan. Both Syria and Lebanon also have territorial claims and many countries do not recognize the Zionist entity.
The idea that Israel is now involved in an ongoing local conflict with the Palestinians is ludicrous. It is a lot border than that. Israel only has peace treaties with Jordan and Egypt. The Arab Peace Initiative has not gone anywhere yet.Jonney2000 (talk) 12:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
OK. This is a tricky topic to summarise in one sentence! How about:
"The Arab-Israeli conflict in a wider sense ran primarily from 1948-73, but continues today, mainly in the form of the more localized Israeli–Palestinian conflict"
Personally I think the distinction between the A-I and I-P is ludicrous, but this is what Misplaced Pages consensus has agreed as we stand today, so I am following it.
.svg){kind=small}
