Revision as of 11:32, 20 April 2017 editMike Christie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors70,173 edits →Non-communist legacy: Pinging FAC participants← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:43, 20 April 2017 edit undoXx236 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers55,481 edits →Non-communist legacyNext edit → | ||
Line 170: | Line 170: | ||
:I think it should be removed as it is badly written and trivial.--] (]) 11:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | :I think it should be removed as it is badly written and trivial.--] (]) 11:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Pinging {{u|Brianboulton}}, {{u|Ian Rose}}, {{u|Tim riley}}, {{u|SchroCat}}, {{u|Nikkimaria}}, {{u|Maunus}}, {{u|Graham11}}, {{u|Алый Король}}, {{u|Dank}}, {{u|Dudley Miles}}, {{u|Graham Beards}}, {{u|Laser brain}}, {{u|Iridescent}}, and {{u|Amakuru}}, all of whom edited the FAC for this article in 2016, plus {{u|Jimfbleak}}, one of the TFA coords, not included in the above list. I'm aware a couple of these editors have since retired, but am pinging everyone, including the opposer, to get as broad a range of commenters as possible. This article will be on the main page in a couple of days, and it would be good to get this discussion resolved before then. ] (] - ] - ]) 11:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | ::Pinging {{u|Brianboulton}}, {{u|Ian Rose}}, {{u|Tim riley}}, {{u|SchroCat}}, {{u|Nikkimaria}}, {{u|Maunus}}, {{u|Graham11}}, {{u|Алый Король}}, {{u|Dank}}, {{u|Dudley Miles}}, {{u|Graham Beards}}, {{u|Laser brain}}, {{u|Iridescent}}, and {{u|Amakuru}}, all of whom edited the FAC for this article in 2016, plus {{u|Jimfbleak}}, one of the TFA coords, not included in the above list. I'm aware a couple of these editors have since retired, but am pinging everyone, including the opposer, to get as broad a range of commenters as possible. This article will be on the main page in a couple of days, and it would be good to get this discussion resolved before then. ] (] - ] - ]) 11:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Trivial are parts of the existing page, since many years. | |||
::Badly written - yes, I wasn't allowed to learn English at school because it was a Communist school and English was the language of our enemies. | |||
::Pissing Lening is the reaction on 45 years of Leninist terror and cultural terror. The page contains Communist legacy. It's obvious bias. You have created biased page, now you are told - it's biased and you answer: your critics is ''badly written and trivial''. ] (]) 11:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:43, 20 April 2017
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vladimir Lenin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Vladimir Lenin is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 22, 2017. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vladimir Lenin article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Not so good article
Fischer 1964 as the main source
I don't know the book, but:
- Fischer was a journalist, not a historian.
- Many Soviet documents were top secret in 1964.Xx236 (talk) 13:17, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Lenin is viewed by Marxist-Leninists
There are almost no Marxist-Leninists in Poland. Where are there so many of them to be mentioned here?Xx236 (talk) 13:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
united Russia
Not united but invided and annected.Xx236 (talk) 13:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
Responding to wartime devastation, famine, and popular uprisings
Rather Responding to the destruction of Russia due to his own crazy ideas of a society without economy Xx236 (talk) 13:48, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- A number of these points fail to make any coherent sense so I'm not really sure what is actually being conveyed. What on Earth does "There are almost no Marxist-Leninists in Poland. Where are there so many of them to be mentioned here?" mean? It is also apparent that there is a level of anti-Lenin WP:Advocacy going on here and statements like "his own crazy ideas of a society without economy" demonstrate a complete lack of familiarity with Lenin's actual beliefs. As for the claim regarding Fischer, his major biography of Lenin is only one of several used here; it is not the "main source" by any means. Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:07, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
- What is the source of your knowledge? Do you have any knowledge of Lenin's economical dreams? Xx236 (talk) 12:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- I admit, I'm anti-Lrenin, like I'm anti-Stalin and anti-Hitler.Xx236 (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Russian
If I translate the russian article, it is clear not much work has been done on the English one, also they have FACTUAL SOURCES. Considering this is one of the most famous communists I seem to be lead into dislike for him based on what is written and which historians/journalists are used for the sources that work. Maybe he knew he would be demonized in countries run by the bourgeoisie? Maybe because he is a part of Russian history, so they are actually motivated to have true information on his life? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2407:7000:9404:E381:C8A8:E7A2:60DE:DA53 (talk) 20:59, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- ...And your point is? Most of what you have written above is unintelligible. Graham Beards (talk) 21:28, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Graham, the point being that the article relies on verifiable sources whose historicism might be faulty, and that the semantics are highly disfavorable. I think that comes across pretty clear and I'm not even a native English speaker. But then again, wikipedia's politics are extraordinarily libertarian so I'm not surprised that one of its shills is conveniently blind to any inherent ideology in the articles. /Revan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.252.69.13 (talk) 13:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Image sizes
I thought this would be a good place to ask Midnightblueowl what the merit of selectively enlarging a picture of a house is. Over to you. --John (talk) 21:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- I was merely restoring the longstanding image size. Having the image slightly larger allows it to better fit within the given space vis-à-vis the adjacent text and permits the reader a clearer view of the building featured in the photograph. Without the slight enlargement the image is too small to make out any level of detail. Moreover, the enlarged image size has been a longstanding part of the article and was present when it passed as an FA, so it is not something that has attracted any opposition or criticism over the past year or so. Midnightblueowl (talk) 21:50, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
- The size the image displays at is a function of the particular device one views it on. I see this was discussed at the FAC last year. It is better to leave them at standard. Sometimes one is left bigger in thumbnail view if it is important to reveal detail without clicking on the image. I've seen this used for a map, for example. This is a picture of a house and to me it doesn't seem to matter if the reader can see the detail without clicking on it. Am I missing something? --John (talk) 21:53, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
POV
One of the main sources is a 1964 book by a journalist Louis Fischer. At that time many documents were closed in Soviet archives.Xx236 (talk) 11:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- The other source - Sandle about Soviet Socialism. Which part of Soviet was Socialist - mass executions, starvation, rapes, atomic weapons?Xx236 (talk) 12:04, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- responsible for mass human rights abuses. - no rights abuses are able in lowlessness.Xx236 (talk) 12:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- a champion of socialism and the working class - has he ever met the working class? The working class in Poland destroyed his system.Xx236 (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- I have removed Lenin was anti-imperialist, and believed that all nations deserved "the right of self-determination". because Lenin created the Soviet empire annecting many nations, eg. Georgians, Red Army invasion of Georgia.Xx236 (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- People, stop your dreams about good Lenin. Xx236 (talk) 12:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- A lot of the stuff you're talking about happened after Lenin died, like atomic weapons and Polish Solidarity. And this page is not supposed to be a pro- or anti-Lenin rant. Lenin's positions on imperialism and national self-determination are important and need to be included. Equally Lenin's policies in consolidating the USSR also need to be mentioned. But it's shouldn't be a matter of point-scoring.--Jack Upland (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
- The text has plenty of issues and you don't address any of them. Xx236 (talk) 05:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Lenin himself created the basis of Stalinism.
- As far the point-scoring works creating a biased featured page.
- A lot of the stuff you're talking about happened after Lenin died, like atomic weapons and Polish Solidarity. And this page is not supposed to be a pro- or anti-Lenin rant. Lenin's positions on imperialism and national self-determination are important and need to be included. Equally Lenin's policies in consolidating the USSR also need to be mentioned. But it's shouldn't be a matter of point-scoring.--Jack Upland (talk) 12:54, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Xx236 (talk) 05:30, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Vladimir Lenin is a featured article
accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style
- Bad joke.Xx236 (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- This article will appear on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 22, 2017.
- Very bad joke.Xx236 (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Under Trotsky's leadership, the Red Army put down the rebellion
This page is about Lenin and Lenin decided to fight against the revolutionaries. Doesn't Under Trotsky's leadership move responsibility?Xx236 (talk) 06:03, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Dialectic
An article about Lenin doesn't even mention dialectic or diamat. It's certainly not a featured article.Xx236 (talk) 06:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Ryan's opinions are controversial
http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=43183 Xx236 (talk) 06:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- 10,000 victims of Red Terror? 50,000 according a Russian historian.
- All victims of Soviet repressions - about 2 million.Xx236 (talk) 06:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Non-communist legacy
I have questioned the value and sourcing of this section with the author. As they are reluctant to discuss it here, I am doing so for them. --John (talk) 10:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- I think it should be removed as it is badly written and trivial.--Jack Upland (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging Brianboulton, Ian Rose, Tim riley, SchroCat, Nikkimaria, Maunus, Graham11, Алый Король, Dank, Dudley Miles, Graham Beards, Laser brain, Iridescent, and Amakuru, all of whom edited the FAC for this article in 2016, plus Jimfbleak, one of the TFA coords, not included in the above list. I'm aware a couple of these editors have since retired, but am pinging everyone, including the opposer, to get as broad a range of commenters as possible. This article will be on the main page in a couple of days, and it would be good to get this discussion resolved before then. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:32, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Trivial are parts of the existing page, since many years.
- Badly written - yes, I wasn't allowed to learn English at school because it was a Communist school and English was the language of our enemies.
- Pissing Lening is the reaction on 45 years of Leninist terror and cultural terror. The page contains Communist legacy. It's obvious bias. You have created biased page, now you are told - it's biased and you answer: your critics is badly written and trivial. Xx236 (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
- Fischer 1964, p. 87. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFischer1964 (help)
- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- Misplaced Pages articles that use British English
- All unassessed articles
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Top-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- FA-Class biography (core) articles
- Core biography articles
- Top-importance biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class Soviet Union articles
- Top-importance Soviet Union articles
- WikiProject Soviet Union articles
- FA-Class socialism articles
- Top-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles
- FA-Class Russia articles
- Top-importance Russia articles
- Top-importance FA-Class Russia articles
- FA-Class Russia (history) articles
- History of Russia task force articles
- WikiProject Russia articles
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class Russian, Soviet and CIS military history articles
- Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force articles
- FA-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- FA-Class Atheism articles
- Mid-importance Atheism articles
- FA-Class Judaism articles
- Mid-importance Judaism articles
- FA-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- FA-Class Economics articles
- High-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- FA-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- FA-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles