Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:09, 25 April 2017

Userpage	Talk page	Awards	Articles	Sources

Sources

Sent you some pages of Floor, Willem (2006) The Persian Gulf: A Political and Economic History of Five Port Cities, 1500-1730. Thought you might be interested. - LouisAragon (talk) 02:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Sent you another mail. - LouisAragon (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

LouisAragon: Replied. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Ditto. - LouisAragon (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

LouisAragon: Ditto back lel. --HistoryofIran (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

- Was just checking some stuff. I'm not really sure how we should define the criteria for an individual in order to be added to Category:Safavid generals. All these "beglarbegs" for example, were military commanders as well, apart from being known as "governor". Should we just add all of them to the category in question as a matter of habit? Will be one very large category in that case. I know that there are still alooot of categories to be made for all the individuals, but I believe this is just one of those minor things that we should get cleared up early on, haha.

- I've got another source that I'd really like to send to you, but the file is too large unfortunately ("On the Ethno-Social Background of Four Gholām Families from Georgia in Safavid Iran". Studia Iranica (32)"). - LouisAragon (talk) 00:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

LouisAragon:

- Hmm, not sure. Perhaps we should start creating hakem, beglarbegi. etc categories? Do what you think is best.

- Haha that's fine - do you have any sources about the Lurs/Laks/Bakhtiaris/Kurds (and/or their families, such as the Zangana, Zand etc) during the Safavid/Afsharid/Zand period? --HistoryofIran (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Yeah thats a good one. We probably should. Will start creating them in the near future. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Hmm, I might have some specific stuff about the Zangana and Zands during the Safavid period. Not entirely sure though. Will let you know! - LouisAragon (talk) 22:07, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Laks and their language

hi. sources for Laks (Iran) and Laki language are bogus. only Izadpanah and Cultural Survival Quarterly Magazine are right. by the way second one mentioned that The Luri dialect is closer to Persian while Laki is closer to Kurdish. and Izadpanah is a poet not a linguist . also archive of Ethnologue which mentioned 2 time for Lurish identity and language is not working because Ethnologue corrected the matter and classified Laki as Kurdish here in new edit and other sources hat he mentioned are bogus. he did some vandalism in Kalhor (Iranian tribe) and mentioned Lurish identity and language for them by similar source forging but i noticed to an admin and he protected the article. the vandal user got some warns and blocked because of vandalism in Persian Misplaced Pages. also there are other reliable sources for their Kurdish identity like Encyclopaedia Islamica here. --– Hossein Iran « talk » 23:44, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Write that in the talk page of the article please. --HistoryofIran (talk) 23:47, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

also in Laki dialect sources were those disputed and fake ones. in Persian Misplaced Pages article of Lak protected because of vandalism by special users. --– Hossein Iran « talk » 15:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Ethnologue corrected the matter and other sources are fake. why you put sources in the article?--– Hossein Iran « talk » 06:50, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Again, 'other sources are fake' is not an argument. --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Debresser (talk) 15:09, 25 April 2017 (UTC)