| Revision as of 23:40, 30 April 2017 editTenebrae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users155,424 edits 3RR warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:41, 30 April 2017 edit undoNihlus (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,107 edits Undid revision 778071260 by Tenebrae (talk) gtfoNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ==Neutral notice== | ==Neutral notice== | ||
| This is a neutral notice to editors at ] that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at ]. --] (]) 14:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC) | This is a neutral notice to editors at ] that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at ]. --] (]) 14:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ==3RR== | |||
| This is the required notice that you are on the cusp of violating ] at ]. Two editors have now rveerted you. --] (]) 23:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:41, 30 April 2017
Leave a message!
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Brocicle (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Request for Rollback
Please see my query on your request here. Thank you, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 07:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
RuPaul's Drag Race
I have reverted you edits since you added HIGHS and LOWs without giving any RS secondary sources. The closing statement is very clear that without these sources, specific to each claim, that stating HIGH and LOW is OR. No such cites were given at your edits.--Tenebrae (talk) 22:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Actually, you're misconstruing Misplaced Pages policy on WP:VERIFY. You didn't cite one single claim of HIGH or LOW. Not one. Anyone can claim anything without verification — without a timestamp and a quote, we're just taking your subjective, POV word that someone somewhere in the episode said something someone might construe as saying someone's chances of continuing were high or low. That is not how VERIFY works. As the closer said, claims based on the episodes "very fact dependent on what exactly was said."
- "Even as to relying on the show itself is a primary source, which we could rely upon. Of course we have to be very careful in such a case not to do WP:OR." Without providing cites, you absolutely are doing your own personal OR of people's chances.
- After I reverted to status quo, you, per ] are supposed to discuss the issue on the article's talk page, where discussion is currently active. Instead you are edit-warring. I think it's time for an RfC to clarify unequivocally that you cannot make footnote-less claims based on your own subjective interpretations. --Tenebrae (talk) 13:53, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Neutral notice
This is a neutral notice to editors at RuPaul's Drag Race that an RfC on sourcing and citing has begun at Talk:RuPaul's Drag Race#Request for comment. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2017 (UTC)