| Revision as of 12:24, 26 September 2006 editFys (talk | contribs)14,706 edits →"Libel/False information": correct quote← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:53, 26 September 2006 edit undoFys (talk | contribs)14,706 edits 3RR violationNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Which bit exactly is libellous? Which bit is false? ] | ] 12:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | Which bit exactly is libellous? Which bit is false? ] | ] 12:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :You have yet to explain this. ] | ] 19:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ==Three revert rule== | |||
| You have just reverted ] for the fourth time within 24 hours. That breaks the ]. Your reverts are not justified under the ] policy because the information you are removing is not negative and is sourced. ] | ] 19:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:53, 26 September 2006
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. As a member of the Misplaced Pages community, I would like to remind you of Misplaced Pages's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. Thank you! --Nlu (talk) 06:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Baroness Cox
Please see Talk:Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox. I would like to know exactly what is deficient in the sources provided - they seem perfectly reliable to me. David | Talk 14:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
"Libel/False information"
Which bit exactly is libellous? Which bit is false? David | Talk 12:21, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- You have yet to explain this. David | Talk 19:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Three revert rule
You have just reverted Caroline Cox, Baroness Cox for the fourth time within 24 hours. That breaks the three revert rule. Your reverts are not justified under the WP:BLP policy because the information you are removing is not negative and is sourced. David | Talk 19:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)