| Revision as of 14:18, 14 August 2005 edit70.171.46.247 (talk) →Brief Discussion← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:45, 5 June 2017 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,824,053 editsm +{{Redirect category shell}} using AWB |
| (289 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
#REDIRECT ] |
|
Since the beginnings of ] and even ], there has been a strand of opinion which rejects, objects to, or has been highly critical of the costs of the changes that these trends brought about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Redirect category shell|1= |
|
As such there is no movement labelled ''anti-modernism'', instead it is a catch all term for different critiques of the modern era, modernism, modernist works, or some combination of the above. |
|
|
|
{{R from merge}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
] can be seen as an anti-modernist piece of work since it expresses affection for a simple, non-mechanistic life. The rural Shire is the embodiment of the good life, while the industrialized ] is foul and corrupt. The Ring can be seen as symbolizing the atomic bomb, however the plot is from the 1930s and at that time, Tolkien didn't know about atomic energy yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
== Brief Discussion == |
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-modern movements represent a wide range of critiques, including appeals to ], ], ], ], ], ], ] or ] virtues. They may reject technologies, or their use, social organizations, such as corporations, or some combination of the above. They may reject modernism on the grounds of its denying ] of particular kinds. |
|
|
|
|
|
== See also == |
|
|
|
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
== External links == |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
] ] |
|