Misplaced Pages

Development criticism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:16, 4 May 2006 editJarkka Saariluoma (talk | contribs)399 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:45, 5 June 2017 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,824,726 editsm +{{Redirect category shell}} using AWB 
(276 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
'''Development criticism''' is any of a number of viewpoints critical of ] and its impact on contemporary society. It is also called '''anti-modernism'''. Development critical movements represent a wide range of critiques, including appeals to ], ], ], ], ], ] or ] virtues. Essential characteristics of modern society such as modern ], ], ] and ] are disapproved by most of development critics.


{{Redirect category shell|1=
The most well known development critic is ], who critisized heavily modern technology and many other characteristics of western culture. He - like many other development critics - recommened local food production instead of modern trade. These days, similar thinkers often criticize contemporary globalization.
{{R from merge}}

}}
Environmental issues are important for development critics. Many of them even have first arrived to development critical conclusions because they see modern society as a threat for environment.

Also the happiness of people is one of the central themes in development critical writings. Modern societies - despite of all their goal-orieted complexity and amount of labour time - do not help people to reach happiness according to critics. Instead, happiness is often seen as harder to reach in modern society compared to primitive ones.

Often development critics criticize concepts used in modern societies, such as ] and other welfare-related conceptualizations such as ] and ]. According to critics, these kind of concepts make misleadingly the life of primitive or alternative societies to look dull for modern people. For example, high longevity level is seen as a objectively good thing, which according to critics, is wrong. Modern societies have subjective standards for welfare, but they apply these standards universally and (mis)judge other societies with them. Also attempts to develope non-developed societies are often seen as cause of misery and trouble. It is thus recommended that the development project should be cancelled. Some even see the word "development" as negative and think that it represents the conceptual imperialism.

Development critics can be ] like Mohandas Gandhi or use violece like ]. Development critics are often politically left leaned and favour ideas such as pacifism and local-level democracy. But some, like ], have even favoured dictatorship. Development critics are in most of cases filantropists but some may be misanthropists, blaming human nature for the problems of the earth.

Also some religious organizations, like for example ], have time to time taken anti-modernist and development critical stances by critizising modern technology or other principal characteristics of prevailing societies.

In modern academic discussion, ] (and some other post-modernist lines of thinking), have been advocates of development critical views.

==Famous development critics==
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]

== See also ==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== External links ==
*
* Compost modernity

]
]
]
]
{{disambig}}

Latest revision as of 12:45, 5 June 2017

Redirect to:

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
  • From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.