Misplaced Pages

Development criticism: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:29, 5 February 2014 editRhododendrites (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers67,030 edits Proposing article for deletion per WP:PROD. (TW)← Previous edit Latest revision as of 12:45, 5 June 2017 edit undoTom.Reding (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Template editors3,820,737 editsm +{{Redirect category shell}} using AWB 
(27 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{Proposed deletion/dated

|concern = Looks more like a category or stand-alone list than an article. Even then, both the subject and inclusion criteria are unclear. If this refers to a particular field of study, most of the names on the list do not belong. If it refers to a particular outlook on technology, we already have ] and ] among several others. "Development" as a subject for criticism has many more meanings than "technological development," which is either (a) vague, (b) value-laden, or (c) duplicitous of a better defined subject. The disambiguation page for "Development" lists no form of "development" that fits with the general "technological" subject of this page.
{{Redirect category shell|1=
|timestamp = 20140205142859
{{R from merge}}
}} }}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Original research|date=February 2008}}
{{cleanup|date=February 2010}}
{{organize|date=December 2012}}
{{No footnotes|date=November 2009}}
}}

'''Development criticism''' refers to criticisms of technological development.

==Notable development critics==
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] (])
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* the ] (])
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{col-break}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{col-break}}
* ]
* ]
* ] organization
* ] (Italian movement)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{col-break}}
{{col-end}}

== See also ==
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{col-break}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]s
* ]
{{col-break}}
{{col-end}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Development-critical literature==
* ]: Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton University Press 1995, ISBN 0-691-00102-2
* ], ''The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith'', Expanded Edition, London: Zed Books, 2003, ISBN 1-84277-181-7
* The Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power, ed. by Wolfgang Sachs, London: Zed Books, 1992, ISBN 1-85649-044-0
* ]: ISBN 974-92863-0-8
* ]: Hind Swaraj (1909)
* ]: ''Tools for Conviviality'' (1973)
* ] (Zed Books, ed. Majid Rahnema, 1997), ISBN 1-85649-474-8
* No Place of Grace: antimodernism and the transformation of American culture 1880-1920, 1994, ISBN 0-226-46970-0
* ]: '']'' (1854)
* ]: ] (1995)
* Singh, S. (2007). . ''International Journal of Social Welfare'', 16(2), 100–109.

==External links==
*
*
* Stafford Beer
*

{{Technology}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Development Criticism}}
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 12:45, 5 June 2017

Redirect to:

This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
  • From a merge: This is a redirect from a page that was merged into another page. This redirect was kept in order to preserve the edit history of this page after its content was merged into the content of the target page. Please do not remove the tag that generates this text (unless the need to recreate content on this page has been demonstrated) or delete this page.
When appropriate, protection levels are automatically sensed, described and categorized.