| Revision as of 08:49, 30 September 2006 view sourceFresheneesz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,055 edits rv - please discuss the change, editing this proposal to be a guideline does not help← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:51, 30 September 2006 view source Radiant! (talk | contribs)36,918 editsm Reverted edits by Fresheneesz (talk) to last version by LarNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{ |
{{guideline|]<br>]}} | ||
| {{IncGuide}} | {{IncGuide}} | ||
Revision as of 10:51, 30 September 2006
 | This page documents an English Misplaced Pages ]. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. |
]
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
- For the essay on evaluating notability, see Misplaced Pages:Notability/Arguments.
The concept of notability is based on what Misplaced Pages is not. It can be argued that topics must meet a minimum threshold of notability to deserve an article on Misplaced Pages. The terms "importance" and "significance" are also in use, and for practical purposes on Misplaced Pages they are similar.
Several guidelines, shown in the table on the right, have been created, or are under discussion, to define more precisely what these thresholds should be. They generally assert that a minimum standard for any given topic is that it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, where the source is independent of the topic itself.
Articles on subjects with borderline notability are frequently merged into list articles (e.g. List of esoteric programming languages), or into an article on a related subject (e.g. articles about not-well-known relatives of a famous person tend to be merged into the article on the person itself).
Articles on non-notable subjects are nominated for Proposed Deletion and Articles for Deletion, and the article's merits are discussed, as can be seen through precedents. An article on the topic of a person, a group of people, a band, or a club that does not even assert the notability of that topic can be deleted without argument.
Rationale
- In order to have a verifiable article, a topic must be notable enough that it will be described by multiple independent sources.
- In order to have a neutral article with minimal errors, a topic must be notable enough that there will be non-partisan editors interested in editing it.
- Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. As such, Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate directory of businesses, websites, persons, etc.
See also
This page documents the status quo. There are (and have been) several proposals to alter the status quo, such as:
- Misplaced Pages:Non-notability, an active proposal to use only verifiability in regard to whether "non-notable" subjects should be included in Misplaced Pages.