Misplaced Pages

:Notability: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:33, 30 September 2006 view sourceStephen B Streater (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers7,351 edits ''Define'' seems a bit precise for the meaning required here← Previous edit Revision as of 22:52, 30 September 2006 view source Centrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits Make introduction more straightforward, keep "most areas" verbiageNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{disputed}}
{{guideline|]<br>]}} {{guideline|]<br>]}}
{{IncGuide}} {{IncGuide}}
Line 5: Line 4:
:''For the essay on evaluating notability, see ].'' :''For the essay on evaluating notability, see ].''


The concept of notability is based on ]. It can be argued that topics must meet a minimum threshold of notability to deserve an article on Misplaced Pages. The terms "importance" and "significance" are also in use, and for practical purposes on Misplaced Pages they are similar. Topics in most areas must meet a minimum threshold of '''notability''' in order for an article on that topic to remain on Misplaced Pages. This is a necessary result of Misplaced Pages being a ], ] ]. The terms "importance" and "significance" are also in use, and for practical purposes on Misplaced Pages they are similar.


The guidelines shown in the table on the right have been created, or are under discussion, to set out more precisely what these thresholds should be. They generally assert that a minimum standard for any given topic is that it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, where the source is ] of the topic itself. The guidelines shown in the table on the right have been created, or are under discussion, to set out more precisely what these thresholds should be. They generally assert that a minimum standard for any given topic is that it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, where the source is ] of the topic itself.

Revision as of 22:52, 30 September 2006

Blue tickThis page documents an English Misplaced Pages ].
Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page.

]

Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also
For the essay on evaluating notability, see Misplaced Pages:Notability/Arguments.

Topics in most areas must meet a minimum threshold of notability in order for an article on that topic to remain on Misplaced Pages. This is a necessary result of Misplaced Pages being a neutral, verifiable encyclopedia. The terms "importance" and "significance" are also in use, and for practical purposes on Misplaced Pages they are similar.

The guidelines shown in the table on the right have been created, or are under discussion, to set out more precisely what these thresholds should be. They generally assert that a minimum standard for any given topic is that it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, where the source is independent of the topic itself.

Articles on subjects with borderline notability are frequently merged into list articles (e.g. List of esoteric programming languages), or into an article on a related subject (e.g. articles about not-well-known relatives of a famous person tend to be merged into the article on the person itself).

Articles on non-notable subjects are nominated for Proposed Deletion and Articles for Deletion, and the article's merits are discussed, as can be seen through precedents. An article on the topic of a person, a group of people, a band, or a club that does not even assert the notability of that topic can be deleted without argument.

Rationale

  • In order to have a verifiable article, a topic must be notable enough that it will be described by multiple independent sources.
  • In order to have a neutral article with minimal errors, a topic must be notable enough that there will be non-partisan editors interested in editing it.
  • Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia. As such, Misplaced Pages is not an indiscriminate directory of businesses, websites, persons, etc.

See also

This page documents the status quo. There are (and have been) several proposals to alter the status quo, such as:

Category: