Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:30, 1 October 2006

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

Click here to create a new report

Violations

Please place new reports at the bottom.

User:Mike18xx reported by User:Itaqallah (Result: 48 hours)

Three revert rule violation on

Mutaween (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Mike18xx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to: 05:21, 25 September 2006
• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert: (almost identical to the above but includes minor relocation of a source/link)

Time report made: 23:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: the only difference between the version reverted to and the presented diffs is the ref-tagging of a passage already present in the article. the actual prose within the article is constant in the original version and the subsequent reverts to it. this user has been blocked in the past for 3RR violations, and on this occasion constantly reverted to a very charged narrative. ITAQALLAH 23:57, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• The has already been blocked for 48 hours per WP:3RR. alphaChimp 18:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Sweet Pinkette reported by 152.3.65.159 07:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC) (Result: no violation)

Three revert rule violation on her talk page. Sweet Pinkette (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2st revert:
• 3nd revert:
• 4rd revert:

Time report made: 07:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment- This user was recently accused of being a suspected sockpuppet of Cute 1 4 U. She repeated delete warnings on her talk page as well. Her IP address, as she claims, is 66.55.225.212.

People don't get blocked for 3RR on their talk pages. OTOH you may be if you persist there William M. Connolley 08:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

In my defense the reason I deleted his/her comments is because this user continued to post snide "warnings" Anonymously on my talk page, despite asking him not to and the despite the initial warning that all unsigned comments (aside OFFICIAL warnings and notices from WP staff and Admins) would be deleted. This user continued to post the same message (I counted about 6 times). He/She was just trying to start drama on my talk page. And apparently is trying to move the drama to this notice board.

And FYI I was CLEARED of the said charges of being a sockpuppet of Cute 1 4 U and even User:Aeon1006 apoligised to me about the matter on my talk page. Thanks for your time over this ludicrous matter. Sweet Pinkette 14:15, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

• Not 3RR per above. alphaChimp 18:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

] reported by User:Charlesknight (Result:)

Three revert rule violation on ] (edit | ] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Tangoedit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to: VersionTime

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

• Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.

Time report made: 16:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Tango edit keeps reverting to a version with an unsourced claim and will not commmunicate about it's inclusion

• Improperly formatted report. Please fix it. alphaChimp 23:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

User:84.12.22.129 reported by User:I already forgot (Result: 24h)

Three revert rule violation on Andrew Murray (tennis player) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 84.12.22.129 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to: VersionTime

• 1st revert: 19:02, September 28, 2006
• 2nd revert: 18:36, September 28, 2006
• 3rd revert: 18:11, September 28, 2006
• 4th revert: 16:18, September 28, 2006

• Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.

Time report made: 02:26, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

2006-09-29T05:33:13 Wangi (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "84.12.22.129 (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (violation of 3RR on Andrew Murray (tennis player)) William M. Connolley 07:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Ramdrake reported by Ernham (Result:)

Three revert rule violation on {{Race and intelligence}}. Ramdrake (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

-->

Time report made: 23:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: Warned previoulsy in his talk page and I recently warned him as well of him violating 3RRV, yet he refused to comply or discuss logically in the discussion page. I started writing this up, but then he finally said he would revert the info back to what was there, and i was satsified with that. I looked at the page and saw that the top of the edit history showed he had in fact reverted back to what i had there prviously, but then when i looked at the current article again, it was back to what it was when he reverted my edition wholy or in part previously. So then i looked back at the edit page and magically the last edit he had on the edit page, the edit that supposedly reverted the material back, had somehow vanished. I can only guess he also edited the edit history of the page as well. So it looks like he not only went over the 3 revert limit, he also wentand altered the history of the page somehow. That's purely speculation however, and I assume you guys have some way of checking that. I've never filled one of these out before so hopefully I did it resonably correctly.

Explanation from Ramdrake:

While I have gone to 3 reverts on this occasion, the 4th revert attributed to me is in fact an edit. I have tried to be reasonable with this editor (please see the edit summary of Intelligence quotient along with the talk page: Talk:Intelligence_quotient, but he has shown to be totally illogical (as per the talk page of Intelligence Quotient), verbally abusive (to the point I had to leave a warning on his user talk page) on Talk:Intelligence_quotient and launched into a revert war. My only error was to let myself get dragged into said revert war. Should I be found guilty of 3RR violation, I would only ask that consideration be given that this user also engaged in the revert war, and that penalties be meted out on both sides, as the reviewing admin sees fit for both behaviors. Thanks for hearing me out.--Ramdrake 23:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Also, for the record, the user has now reinstated twice an uncivil comment and personal attack removed from a talk here as per WP:NPA

Here is my initial removal:

And here are the two instances he reinstated them. Please also notice the edit summaries accompanying these reverts:--Ramdrake 23:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

User Ernham has just reverted the removal of his uncivil comments once more: . Could an admin please look into it and issue the proper warnings or actions? This user seems totally out of control.--Ramdrake 23:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Now he has continually reverted my comments in the discussion, breaking the 3RR -- again. He feels that my opinion of some of the studies he cites as being "trash" science because they are written like op-eds in a newspaper is somehow a personal attack. I'm not even reading any of the stuff he wrote above. I've had enough of him and his control-freakish behaviorErnham 03:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Here are user Ernham's comments in question:

Bunch of trash that reads like op-ed pieces in the New York times. Pfft. You got a PhD in BS, I figure, sure, uhuh. Ernham 22:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC) ()

He has been warned there and on his talk page that this constitutes a personal attack and uncivil language. Nevertheless, he has continued with a fourth revert to this foul language (ref just above). I haven't reverted any other comments of his. I would dare say his constant reintroduction of this injurious material constitutes vandalism, and the appropriate warning has been placed on his user talk page, in addition with the previous warning about NPA. I rest my case.--Ramdrake 03:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Now he continues to (he has been all night) bothering me in various ways on my talk page, usually a variety of veiled threats. Mr. Ramdrake claims to have a PhD in BS,yet he continually cites athropological and psychology studies. This lead me to the sarcastic response of "Yeah, sure, you have PhD in BS." I doubt he does. In any event, he made it clear on his first response of supposed personal attack(either in my own talk page or the discussion page he just violated anothher 3RR on, i forget which) that it was not anything rleated to my sarcastic responce of PhD of BS(biological science), but instead of calling the cites/studies he supplied as "trash". Now he's changed those comments and wants to pretend he had issue with the PhD comment I made and immediately clarified its meaning. i actually work with half a dozen PhDs of BS, and i have this funny feeling he isn't one. Heh. But that's neither here nor there. I'm not responding to him or this matter again until this matter has touched upon by an admin Ernham 03:54, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Diffs not versions please. I've blocked Ernham for 3h for incivility William M. Connolley 07:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

As Ernham's talk page will attest, the "veiled threats" are simply two standard warnings: one for incivility (already dealt with), the second because the multiple reversal of the removal of his comments on the talk page of Intelligence quotient (removal as per WP:NPA and WP:RPA) can and was interpreted as vandalism and treated as repeated addition of nonsense (under WP:VANDAL). All the other interactions that took place on his page are merely explanations related to one or the two points in this paragraph. For authentic veiled threats, please refer to the comments user Ernham left on my talk page: . And again, sorry if this situation mixes up a 3RR situation with one of misbehavior from the part of a user.--Ramdrake 11:51, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to add this again as an afterthought, but for the record I have no admin rights whatsoever, so I couldn't have done what Ernham is suspecting me of doing (altering an article's history page).

Also, when I pointed out my qualifications I mentioned my Ph.D. was in neurobiology. He then retorted by calling it a Ph.D. in BS which under the circumstances I view as a direct insult.--Ramdrake 14:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

This is disgrace that you would dare block me for incivility after someone is reported for violating the 3RR TWICE within hours of each other! Outrageous adminstrator bias. If you would have bothered to take the time to actually read the history of edits on here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Intelligence_quotient&action=history

You would have seen that, when making those comments about PhD in BS that he did not have issue with them. Nope. He had issue with me calling some cites trash. If that is the grounds by which you ban people for hours or even SECONDS, almost the entire wikipedia community would be banned the majority of their liftetimes. This is disgusting and smacks of biased moderation. Ernham 19:34, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

And you better go look up what sarcasm is. What i said was no different from saying "why is it that someone that PhD in a biological science when you only supply cites from psychology and ahtropology sources when you are trying to disprove something related to biological science". needless to say it's much shorter. Do you "get it"? I'm going to be reporting this behavior to any other mods that listen. Totally bogus treatment. Ernham 19:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

And finally, the second 3RRV and supposed "uncivility" issue did not have anytign to do with the previous violation of the 3RR, the one that is fully reported above. So you took the time to punish me for some trumped up "uncivility" claim, yet you did not bother to process the above complaint. Would you care to explain yourself and your behavior before I write you off as being a completely biased admin??Ernham 19:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:MagicKirin reported by User:Axlq (Result: 24h)

Three revert rule violation on A.N.S.W.E.R. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). MagicKirin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to:

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

• 3RR warning on user's talk page: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:MagicKirin&diff=78569126&oldid=78568316

Time report made: 04:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: 7 reverts made on 2006-09-29. User persists in adding blatantly POV statement to article. User made 4 of the 7 reverts on 2006-09-29 (shown above); other reverts back to original version were made by different users. My last revert on (first revert of 2006-09-30) restores to original version without POV statement.

24h William M. Connolley 18:14, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:MagicKirin and sockpuppet User:MagicKirin1 created to circumvent above ban. Reported by User:Axlq (Result: indef)

Three revert rule violation on A.N.S.W.E.R. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). MagicKirin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (reverted as sockpuppet MagicKirin1):

• Previous version reverted to: (my reversion to original form)

• 1st revert: (User MagicKirin)
• 2nd revert: (User MagicKirin)
• 3rd revert: (User MagicKirin)
• 4th revert: (Sockpuppet MagicKirin1)

Time report made: 15:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User:MagicKirin was banned for 24 hours for violating WP:3RR. This user subsequently created the sockpuppet account User:MagicKirin1 to circumvent the ban, and promptly made another reversion (last reversion shown above). Appropriate sockpuppet/sockpuppeteer tags have been added to both user pages.

I've blocked MK1 indefinitely William M. Connolley 18:11, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:69.255.0.91 reported by User:antiuser (Result:)

Three revert rule violation on Gol_Transportes_Aéreos_Flight_1907 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 69.255.0.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to: 13:15, 30 September 2006

• 1st revert:
• 2nd revert:
• 3rd revert:
• 4th revert:

• Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here.

Time report made: 21:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments: User insists on adding a section to the article which is of little or no importance and relevance. What little pertinent information there was in his addition was added to another section of the same article, but user keeps on re-adding the same section. - antiuser 21:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

==User:Zhang Qiang reported by User:Niohe

I want to report User:Zhang Qiang for clear violation of WP:3RR on the following pages:

• First violation
• Second violation

Hope you can deal with this promptly.--Niohe 21:53, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Antman reported by User:Rex (Result:)

Three revert rule violation on German language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Antman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to: (originally) 00:18, 29 September 2006 but the user made various other (but very related) reverts.

• 1st revert: 00:23, 30 September 2006
• 2nd revert: 16:07, 30 September 2006
• 3rd revert: 16:25, 30 September 2006
• 4th revert: 20:42, 30 September 2006
• 5th revert: 23:10, 30 September 2006
• Warning 3RR

Time report made: 22:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

User:Antman is insultive, refuses to accept consensus and refuses to provide references for his highly controversive edits/text.

User has been warned by another user prior to this was posted (warned for 4 reverts, see his talk page) Rex 22:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

If one cares to actually look at my so-called reverts, one would see that only 2, possibly 3 are actually reverts, the others are edits. Ameise -- chat 22:40, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

User:Rex Germanus reported by User:Antman (Result:)

Three revert rule violation on German language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Rex_Germanus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

• Previous version reverted to: (originally) 16:38, September 28, 2006, but the user has also made various other (and signifigantly related) reverts.

• 1st revert: 05:08, September 29, 2006
• 2nd revert: 03:47, September 30, 2006
• 3rd revert: 10:16, September 30, 2006
• 4th revert: 17:03, September 30, 2006

I did not give this user a warning.

Time report made: 22:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Comments:

User:Rex Germanus is abusive and makes repeated comments against me, calling me ignorant. He follows my edits and often reverts them with little or no description besides things such as utter bollocks. He often demands that others give him references, while never giving citations nor references himself. User has not been warned. Ameise 22:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Copy-paste-edit this for a new report

===] reported by User:~~~ (Result:)===
<!-- If your signature has additional fonts, please enter your username manually -->
] violation on 
{{Article|}}. {{3RRV|VIOLATOR_USERNAME}}: 
<!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->
* Previous version reverted to:  
<!-- Use this for simple reverts. For more complex reverts, please include information 
about which previous versions are being reverted to. -->
* 1st revert: 
* 2nd revert: 
* 3rd revert: 
* 4th revert: 
* Necessary only for new users: A diff of 3RR warning _before_ this report was filed here. 
<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. 
Your report may be ignored if it is not placed properly. 
-->
Time report made: ~~~~~
''' Comments:'''

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring