| Revision as of 03:12, 31 July 2017 editWani (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,282 edits →Protection← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:13, 31 July 2017 edit undoWani (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,282 editsm →ProtectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| The IP address keeps adding information and literally refuses to add a source. He's not going to listen, please have the page protected. ] (]) 13:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC) | The IP address keeps adding information and literally refuses to add a source. He's not going to listen, please have the page protected. ] (]) 13:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :Page protection is meant for articles suffering from numerous IP/User vandals within a short time period. Since only one IP is involved, ] can't be applied here. Their behavior constitutes ], which needs to be run through ]. A content dispute such as this should be resolved with a discussion on the article's talk page; unfortunately, since the IP is a mobile user ''and'' has a dynamic IP address, they're never going to see any messages or warnings placed on their own talk page. I have provided a formal warning about their edit warring, so if the problem continues, I can proceed to file a report if necessary. ] (]) 03:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | :Page protection is meant for articles suffering from numerous IP/User vandals within a short time period. Since only one IP is involved, ] can't be applied here. Their behavior constitutes ], which needs to be run through ]. A content dispute such as this should be resolved with a discussion on the article's talk page; unfortunately, since the IP is a mobile user ''and'' has a dynamic IP address, they're never going to see any messages or warnings placed on their own talk page. I have provided a formal warning about their edit warring (even though they probably won't see it), so if the problem continues, I can proceed to file a report if necessary. ] (]) 03:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:13, 31 July 2017
 | Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite is part of the Marvel vs. Capcom series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite received a peer review by Misplaced Pages editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
Characters as functions
This interview with Peter Rosas generated controversy and memes from fans when Rosas, getting asked a question regarding the absence of X-Men characters such as Magneto and Sentinel, he responded with "these characters are just functions", and asserted that characters in the roster such as Captain Marvel and Ultron would be suitable replacements due to having moves and abilities Magneto had in the previous game such as an eight-way air dash. Fans were quick to mock this statement mercilessly, to the point that someone even modded the previous game just to show how silly the "characters are just functions" statement was. Is this worthy of notice? Leader Vladimir (talk) 00:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- Unless it receives significant coverage from other sites, a bunch of memes is not worth mentioning. Wani (talk) 00:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- This is starting to get silly, I think the page needs protection. 79.74.196.74 (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- Already requested. Wani (talk) 17:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- This is starting to get silly, I think the page needs protection. 79.74.196.74 (talk) 17:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Protection
The IP address keeps adding information and literally refuses to add a source. He's not going to listen, please have the page protected. 88.105.185.222 (talk) 13:42, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- Page protection is meant for articles suffering from numerous IP/User vandals within a short time period. Since only one IP is involved, WP:RFPP can't be applied here. Their behavior constitutes edit warring, which needs to be run through WP:AN3. A content dispute such as this should be resolved with a discussion on the article's talk page; unfortunately, since the IP is a mobile user and has a dynamic IP address, they're never going to see any messages or warnings placed on their own talk page. I have provided a formal warning about their edit warring (even though they probably won't see it), so if the problem continues, I can proceed to file a report if necessary. Wani (talk) 03:11, 31 July 2017 (UTC)