Revision as of 00:56, 1 August 2017 editAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits →Coatracking in "Writing" subsection← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:01, 1 August 2017 edit undoAffeL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,562 edits →Unexplained blanking of negative criticismNext edit → | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Unexplained blanking of negative criticism== | ==Unexplained blanking of negative criticism== | ||
Also, AffeL, you the text {{tq|phenomenal", but remarked that "Littlefinger is a boring non-character spouting cliches, Cersei's revenge tour is torture porn on a level with the Ramsay Bolton heyday, and Euron is quickly becoming too ridiculous to take seriously, even though he makes me laugh."}} without explanation. This is inappropriate. You took a mixed review and whitewashed the negative parts. ] (<small>]]</small>) 00:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC) | Also, AffeL, you the text {{tq|phenomenal", but remarked that "Littlefinger is a boring non-character spouting cliches, Cersei's revenge tour is torture porn on a level with the Ramsay Bolton heyday, and Euron is quickly becoming too ridiculous to take seriously, even though he makes me laugh."}} without explanation. This is inappropriate. You took a mixed review and whitewashed the negative parts. ] (<small>]]</small>) 00:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
:: That was an obvious blackwashing, that was removed. The quote before was a summary of what the reviewer note about the episode, but you decided to give such a heavy focus and weight to 1 negative part out of over 100 positives. - ] (]) 01:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:01, 1 August 2017
A Song of Ice and Fire C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Television C‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Coatracking in "Writing" subsection
@AffeL: Please explain this edit. Your edit summary makes no sense. The fact that it's a quote from one of the writers doesn't make it about writing: he's also one of the showrunners, and the whole interview was about the casting and performance of Diana Rigg -- throughout the series. Do you understand this problem? It is sometimes difficult to tell whether you know what you are talking about. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- "She’s probably the only character to win her own death scene" is obviously about the story, not the actor. Plus you can always move that quote to the casting section instead of removing it. - AffeL (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nope. They gave the character her own death scene because they love the actress. You can maybe spin that to be about writing more than casting, but only by making assumptions about what he meant by "only ... scene" -- if, and only if, he was talking about the only death scene in this episode, then it belongs in a discussion of the writing of this episode (maybe). Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- What you are saying is assuming, but that quote is about the writing. - AffeL (talk) 00:56, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- Nope. They gave the character her own death scene because they love the actress. You can maybe spin that to be about writing more than casting, but only by making assumptions about what he meant by "only ... scene" -- if, and only if, he was talking about the only death scene in this episode, then it belongs in a discussion of the writing of this episode (maybe). Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:44, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Unexplained blanking of negative criticism
Also, AffeL, you removed the text phenomenal", but remarked that "Littlefinger is a boring non-character spouting cliches, Cersei's revenge tour is torture porn on a level with the Ramsay Bolton heyday, and Euron is quickly becoming too ridiculous to take seriously, even though he makes me laugh."
without explanation. This is inappropriate. You took a mixed review and whitewashed the negative parts. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- That was an obvious blackwashing, that was removed. The quote before was a summary of what the reviewer note about the episode, but you decided to give such a heavy focus and weight to 1 negative part out of over 100 positives. - AffeL (talk) 01:01, 1 August 2017 (UTC)