Talk:Kaaba: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 04:44, 5 July 2017 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk \| contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,962 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Kaaba/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:01, 1 August 2017 edit undoEl cid, el campeador (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,962 edits →"Scientific Perspective": new sectionNext edit →
Line 50:		Line 50:

	Yeah I definitely agree. Unless what the authors says came from a medieval Muslim religious source, it should be separate. ] (]) 19:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)		Yeah I definitely agree. Unless what the authors says came from a medieval Muslim religious source, it should be separate. ] (]) 19:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

			== "Scientific Perspective" ==

			==Scientific perspective==
			The below section was added to the article, and I removed it because I think it misrepresents 'science'. I don't think there is any science which supports the view, but it is rather a religious view. I think saying it is a scientific perspective is erroneous. What do other people think?

			There are views that Kaaba is the centre of the earth.<ref> ; Open your eyes, by:Ansar Khan

			Open your eyes, p.35</ref> As per some scientific perspective it is said to be 'the centre around which the earth's centre goes every lunar month'. <ref> The Confluence of Religions: A Scientific Perspective; p.32; Author: Hari Narayan Malla [

			https://books.google.com/books?isbn=9993379107]; p.32</ref> It is also called the 'bary centre' on which earth monthly wobble.

Revision as of 03:01, 1 August 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kaaba article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 31 days

Template:Vital article

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Kaaba. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Kaaba at the Reference desk.

Misplaced Pages is not censored.
Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Misplaced Pages's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Religion: Interfaith Top‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Misplaced Pages's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Islam Top‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Saudi Arabia Top‑importance

	Saudi Arabia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interior

I think the article should address the following about the interior: Who has access to the interior and when? Are ceremonies held inside and what are they? What is used to get up to the high doors (i.e., ladder, ramp, staircase)? Are photographs or other illustrations allowed? Can any be shown on the page? WikiParker (talk)

@WikiParker: The interior is accessible through a locked door, but these are only open twice a year if I'm correct. Images of the interior being in the public domain are something I doubt, but if we speak to someone extremely knowledgeable about the fair use criteria barriers, then perhaps we could include it. Emir of Misplaced Pages (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Keys

According to Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace), the items in the Şadırvanlı Sofa include keys to the Kaaba.

Should this also be mentioned in this article? Andrewa (talk) 08:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kaaba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:47, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Modern views In Islamic traditional views on origin?

The last paragraph contained views of Karen Armstrong except parts of claims based on Ibn Ishaq. However some of the views of Armstrong do not mention her info from any Islamic traditional sources on anything that can be construed what is only from Islamic view. User:Debresser reverted my edit in which I had moved it. I moved it without explaining so sorry for that. As there are other views besides that of Armstrong, like of Uri Rubin, Winfried Corduan etc I've added them as well. However Armstrong's view and pf all others not directly from any Islamic sources should be shifted to modern independent views. 169.149.143.147 (talk) 17:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Done It has been restored to the correct location. Debresser (talk) 18:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Yeah I definitely agree. Unless what the authors says came from a medieval Muslim religious source, it should be separate. 59.89.41.170 (talk) 19:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

"Scientific Perspective"

Scientific perspective

The below section was added to the article, and I removed it because I think it misrepresents 'science'. I don't think there is any science which supports the view, but it is rather a religious view. I think saying it is a scientific perspective is erroneous. What do other people think?

There are views that Kaaba is the centre of the earth. As per some scientific perspective it is said to be 'the centre around which the earth's centre goes every lunar month'. It is also called the 'bary centre' on which earth monthly wobble.

; Open your eyes, by:Ansar Khan Open your eyes, p.35
The Confluence of Religions: A Scientific Perspective; p.32; Author: Hari Narayan Malla [ https://books.google.com/books?isbn=9993379107]; p.32

Categories: