| Revision as of 02:17, 12 August 2017 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,296,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:AussieLegend/Archive 27) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:35, 15 August 2017 edit undoCurly Turkey (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users103,748 edits →"Your reason was that it reads like porn - that's your personal issue": new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
| Hi ], do you know what's causing the error on ], that's effecting series 4, 5 and 6 please?--] (]) 17:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC) | Hi ], do you know what's causing the error on ], that's effecting series 4, 5 and 6 please?--] (]) 17:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :{{tpw}} {{re|Theo Mandela}} Not 100% certain this is the sole reason, but having a quick look, it looks like season five is causing all of the issues. There is no section for season five, and the season five table is missing the headers and is not being closed properly. It's using |} instead of }}. Hope that helps get you started on troubleshooting this. ] (<small>] | ]</small>) 17:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC) | :{{tpw}} {{re|Theo Mandela}} Not 100% certain this is the sole reason, but having a quick look, it looks like season five is causing all of the issues. There is no section for season five, and the season five table is missing the headers and is not being closed properly. It's using |} instead of }}. Hope that helps get you started on troubleshooting this. ] (<small>] | ]</small>) 17:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC) | ||
| == "Your reason was that it reads like porn - that's your personal issue" == | |||
| Given that I've written GAs and FAs about pornographic material, is a surprising comment to make on my stated rationale. Have you ever read ]? That would've saved you some embarassment. Please refrain from the armchair psychology in the future—I was there only to fix some shitty writing. ] <span style="color:red">🍁</span> ] 00:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:35, 15 August 2017
 | This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AussieLegend. |
pages Userboxes Cheatsheet Vandals, bad
sources etc TV programs
 | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
It is approximately 3:38 AM where this user lives (Raymond Terrace). |
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31 |
|
This talk page is automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. Threads with no replies in 7 days may be automatically moved. Discussions here are automatically indexed by User:Legobot) |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Linkspam again
User talk:Bảo Ngậu
I've recently had productive edits reverted by User talk:Bảo Ngậu on page Bảo Long. I dropped a note on his talk page, and saw your entry mentioning Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Personal attack for fixing article. Should I add to that entry, or start a different one? (After all, he hasn't personally attacked me - yet.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:15, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- It's probably a good idea to add to the thread that I started. Although he hasn't attacked you (yet) this demonstrates a consistent approach to editing. --AussieLegend (✉) 15:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well, he's been blocked - it would seem this is due to his attacks on you. I don't see much point in me saying anything further just at the moment. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose we'll just have to see what happens in a week. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- ROTFL!!! Oh Dear Me! (I thought it was only me who was that cynical ... ) But in response to your comment: Yes, I suppose we will. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages has taught me to be cynical. Unfortunately, it's becoming an all too often situation these days. Out of one pan, into another fire. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- You're lucky. I was very cynical before I came to wp; My 10 years on wp has just confirmed my prejudices. ("Enough moaning and wailing!" he cried.) Best wishes, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:33, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages has taught me to be cynical. Unfortunately, it's becoming an all too often situation these days. Out of one pan, into another fire. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- ROTFL!!! Oh Dear Me! (I thought it was only me who was that cynical ... ) But in response to your comment: Yes, I suppose we will. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- I suppose we'll just have to see what happens in a week. --AussieLegend (✉) 10:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well, he's been blocked - it would seem this is due to his attacks on you. I don't see much point in me saying anything further just at the moment. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 09:44, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
Episode table error
Hi User:AussieLegend, do you know what's causing the error on List of Benidorm episodes, that's effecting series 4, 5 and 6 please?--Theo Mandela (talk) 17:03, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @Theo Mandela: Not 100% certain this is the sole reason, but having a quick look, it looks like season five is causing all of the issues. There is no section for season five, and the season five table is missing the headers and is not being closed properly. It's using |} instead of }}. Hope that helps get you started on troubleshooting this. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
"Your reason was that it reads like porn - that's your personal issue"
Given that I've written GAs and FAs about pornographic material, "Your reason was that it reads like porn - that's your personal issue" is a surprising comment to make on my stated rationale. Have you ever read WP:EGG? That would've saved you some embarassment. Please refrain from the armchair psychology in the future—I was there only to fix some shitty writing. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 00:35, 15 August 2017 (UTC)