Misplaced Pages

User talk:RuthieK: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:02, 5 October 2006 editMardavich (talk | contribs)3,682 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 14:17, 5 October 2006 edit undoMardavich (talk | contribs)3,682 edits 3RR warningNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:


: I'm sorry but Farabi is neither Arab nor has any connection to the Arab world. He simply doesn't belong on that list. --] 14:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC) : I'm sorry but Farabi is neither Arab nor has any connection to the Arab world. He simply doesn't belong on that list. --] 14:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

== 3RR warning ==

{{3rr}}--] 14:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:17, 5 October 2006

Welcome!

Hello, RuthieK, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Tyrenius 10:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Conceptual art

See User talk:75.34.10.171. -- Tyrenius 10:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Edits to Conceptual Art

Ms. RuthieK, when deleting my insertion refer to me accurately; otherwise your argument lacks viability. Avantguarde 01:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Seven Raymonds

Re (what was wrong with poor old Jo?) I don't know. I'm researching a book on Oxford Review and Cambridge Footlights troupes - history and where they are now etc. I was a student there. Stuff on Jo came from Emma Kennedy's web pages. Do you have an interest or know anyone who may shed light on the incident or who was involved? I did hear Jo went into asylum/immigration law. -- Stager 12.20 14th September 2006


Unreferenced stuff

Please don't re-add unreferenced stuff into articles. This voulates wikipedia policies. Please also don't put false edit summaries, like you did in -phob- article. `'mikka (t) 20:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Unreferenced stuff: Johnny Vaughan

You (re-)added:

He may not be as bald as he seems, but decided to deal with intractable hair loss by having a preemptive 'no. 1', giving himself at least the illusion of follicle control.

Can you please cite a reputable reference for this, or I'll delete it again. Richard W.M. Jones 14:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Farabi

There is a dispute over weather or not Farabi was Turkic or Persian. But he certainly wasn't Arab. --Mardavich 13:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm sorry but Farabi is neither Arab nor has any connection to the Arab world. He simply doesn't belong on that list. --Mardavich 14:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

3RR warning

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Mardavich 14:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)