| Revision as of 18:58, 22 September 2006 editElonka (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators70,958 edits Name suffix | Revision as of 06:29, 6 October 2006 edit undoPKtm (talk | contribs)2,652 edits Is anyone paying attention to these guidelines?Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Name suffix== | ==Name suffix== | ||
| Regarding whether to append the words (Lost) or {Lost episode) to each article title, I can see using either one, but I thought I'd start some discussion here in case anyone wants to offer an opinion. The way that the ''Star Trek'' episodes seem to handle it, is definitely with the "episode" style, as is seen at ]. --] 18:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | Regarding whether to append the words (Lost) or {Lost episode) to each article title, I can see using either one, but I thought I'd start some discussion here in case anyone wants to offer an opinion. The way that the ''Star Trek'' episodes seem to handle it, is definitely with the "episode" style, as is seen at ]. --] 18:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Is anyone paying attention to these guidelines? == | |||
| See ]. I see no (or very few) edits/reverts that are in the spirit of keeping to these guidelines. The plot section is currently exceeding 2,100 words, including trivia. Almost every tenet is violated from these guidelines, in fact. Trivia is in there that is pure ]. Dialog is included at many junctures. Virtually every scene of the show is described in detail. | |||
| Obviously, I could set about fixing any or all of this, but I'm puzzled as to why others don't seem to be jumping in. Did the mediation matter? Are others not committed to these guidelines? Elonka? Wikipedical? ArgentiumOutlaw? Thanks, ] 06:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:29, 6 October 2006
Name suffix
Regarding whether to append the words (Lost) or {Lost episode) to each article title, I can see using either one, but I thought I'd start some discussion here in case anyone wants to offer an opinion. The way that the Star Trek episodes seem to handle it, is definitely with the "episode" style, as is seen at Category:Star Trek episodes. --Elonka 18:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Is anyone paying attention to these guidelines?
See A Tale of Two Cities (Lost). I see no (or very few) edits/reverts that are in the spirit of keeping to these guidelines. The plot section is currently exceeding 2,100 words, including trivia. Almost every tenet is violated from these guidelines, in fact. Trivia is in there that is pure original research. Dialog is included at many junctures. Virtually every scene of the show is described in detail.
Obviously, I could set about fixing any or all of this, but I'm puzzled as to why others don't seem to be jumping in. Did the mediation matter? Are others not committed to these guidelines? Elonka? Wikipedical? ArgentiumOutlaw? Thanks, PKtm 06:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)