| Revision as of 01:58, 8 October 2006 editBaristarim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users28,782 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:06, 8 October 2006 edit undoKhosrow II (talk | contribs)3,394 edits →Disruption on mutliple pagesNext edit → | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
| :Please tell that to the other User, he blatantly is ignoring Inshahee's warning.] 01:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | :Please tell that to the other User, he blatantly is ignoring Inshahee's warning.] 01:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::Please dont fall into this trap.. I didn't ignore Inshanee's warning.. EVERY single time I make a change he uses the word ''pan-turkist'', this is really getting old.. You must understand how nerving it is to be called a vandal and pan-turkist and eg ''You continuously make baseless and ridiculous assertions without facts'', ''other pan Turkists that you muster up''.. Surely you must see that it is not easy to take it easy when even legitimate edits are reversed - an hour before this episode, i made this edit to calm a revert war in the ] article, please have a look at yourself - this is the one he is referring to and right after I was reverted like this !! How would you feel if that edit summary was directed at you? honestly? As for the Iranian's noticeboard, I took down inflammatory and unconstructive notices and simply added ''POV issues'' replacing ''Full of POV and propaganda'', ''under attack by pan-turkists'' that were practically calling on everyone to a turf war, he was also warned by other impartial users for the same reason sometime ago.. Regards.. ] 01:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | ::Please dont fall into this trap.. I didn't ignore Inshanee's warning.. EVERY single time I make a change he uses the word ''pan-turkist'', this is really getting old.. You must understand how nerving it is to be called a vandal and pan-turkist and eg ''You continuously make baseless and ridiculous assertions without facts'', ''other pan Turkists that you muster up''.. Surely you must see that it is not easy to take it easy when even legitimate edits are reversed - an hour before this episode, i made this edit to calm a revert war in the ] article, please have a look at yourself - this is the one he is referring to and right after I was reverted like this !! How would you feel if that edit summary was directed at you? honestly? As for the Iranian's noticeboard, I took down inflammatory and unconstructive notices and simply added ''POV issues'' replacing ''Full of POV and propaganda'', ''under attack by pan-turkists'' that were practically calling on everyone to a turf war, he was also warned by other impartial users for the same reason sometime ago.. Regards.. ] 01:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::Are you kidding me? I was not even the first to call you a pan Turk. It was evident by your edits that you have some agenda. Its funny that you also dont debate with sources, just your POV. You were proven wrong on several occasions yet you still refuse to understand that things are based on facts, not POV. You go as far as saying that the University of Texas is not a reliable source. And the Culture of the Ottoman empire is as the title says, '''about the culture''', yet you want to take out all references to Arabic and Iranian culture, which made up the culture of the Ottoman Empire.] 02:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:06, 8 October 2006
|
| 1 2 3 4 5 6 |
124.184.224.64
Sarah, why can't you block this vandal? As evidence I offer his history of 'contributions'.I elliot 16:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for Info
Sarah, thanks a lot for the info. I have considered getting a username, but never got around to it. I probably will have to eventually, but I don't think it will remove the WHOIS link already posted. I was concerned about my info being put out there, but I'm also wondering why it was put out there to begin with, and what the advantage is of doing so. 24.23.51.27 10:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
|
Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with a tally of 66/11/5. I learned quite a bit during the process, and I expect to be learning a lot more in the days ahead. As I stated in the request itself, I respect your decision to oppose me based on my short tour of duty, but I hope I can earn your trust. I will be taking things slowly (and doing a lot of re-reading), but please let me know if there is anything I can do to improve in my new capacity. -- Merope 13:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC) |
My archives
Sarah, Thank you for the thoughtful gesture to archive my talk page during my wikibreak. You are doing a great job as an administrator. Big cheers to you! KarateLadyKarateLady 14:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
New Chum Problems
Sarah, I can now work your page, but there is no "edit" tab on Adam's page (nor a plus sign!).
Pat Pat Comben 09:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
My talk page
I didn't realise it was protected. Please unprotect it. Adam 09:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Appreciation
Many thanks. it starts to come together now. When you start and the most basic of things cannot be done it is all daunting. Many thanks. Pat Comben 09:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Re:Rollback
Thanks for letting me know about that. However, for some reason it won't work. - Mike (Trick or treat) 11:17, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
- Here's how it looks in my monobook - kind of out of kilter for some unknown reason. User:Mike1/monobook.js. I'll see if I can get a hold of the creator of the script, and thanks again! - Mike (Trick or treat) 11:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Angela Beesley
nominated for deletion. --Coroebus 16:12, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Jimbo
I disagree with both you and Jimbo about my reverting garbage on his talk page; but I'm an old man with a heart condition and I literally don't have the heart for this. Don't worry about me; I am really good at going away and doing something else for a while ... I just recently had a hospital test that clarifes the exact nature of my problem and it turns out that it is rare enough that the best medical science calls its cause and treatment "an enigma". WAS 4.250 01:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Disruption on mutliple pages
User:Baristarim continually attacks pages without reason, and along with his other pan Turk friends tries to push propaganda and POV on several articles. He is currently attack the Iranian's notice board page, claiming its a place where we recruit "meat puppets" where infact it is a place where we can post articles that are in urgent need of attention, such as the Ottoman Empire article where him and his friend claim that Persian and Arabic cultures had no affect, where infact, its exactly the opposite (see talk page). Please do something about this user.Khosrow II 01:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please tell that to the other User, he blatantly is ignoring Inshahee's warning.Khosrow II 01:41, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please dont fall into this trap.. I didn't ignore Inshanee's warning.. EVERY single time I make a change he uses the word pan-turkist, this is really getting old.. You must understand how nerving it is to be called a vandal and pan-turkist and eg You continuously make baseless and ridiculous assertions without facts, other pan Turkists that you muster up.. Surely you must see that it is not easy to take it easy when even legitimate edits are reversed - an hour before this episode, i made this edit to calm a revert war in the Culture of the Ottoman Empire article, please have a look at yourself - this is the one he is referring to and right after I was reverted like this !! How would you feel if that edit summary was directed at you? honestly? As for the Iranian's noticeboard, I took down inflammatory and unconstructive notices and simply added POV issues replacing Full of POV and propaganda, under attack by pan-turkists that were practically calling on everyone to a turf war, he was also warned by other impartial users for the same reason sometime ago.. Regards.. Baristarim 01:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me? I was not even the first to call you a pan Turk. It was evident by your edits that you have some agenda. Its funny that you also dont debate with sources, just your POV. You were proven wrong on several occasions yet you still refuse to understand that things are based on facts, not POV. You go as far as saying that the University of Texas is not a reliable source. And the Culture of the Ottoman empire is as the title says, about the culture, yet you want to take out all references to Arabic and Iranian culture, which made up the culture of the Ottoman Empire.Khosrow II 02:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)