Revision as of 16:31, 16 February 2013 editGiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,173 edits →Andy Mabbit cases← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 11:20, 28 September 2017 edit undoGiano (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,173 edits →userspace to mainspace | ||
(20 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
* | * | ||
* | |||
* A little warning about Sandstein that the community have chosen to ignore, will be amusing to use in a few months. 13.IV.09 | * A little warning about Sandstein that the community have chosen to ignore, will be amusing to use in a few months. 13.IV.09 | ||
Line 160: | Line 159: | ||
==Silly templates that people like to see== | |||
==Andy Mabbit cases== | |||
{{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} | |||
* ] July 2007 |
Latest revision as of 11:20, 28 September 2017
Pages and things I have collected and may want sometime
Images
- User:Giano/Images I shall want some images, mostly by me, anyone writing on architecture may find them useful, again I never quite found the time to use them.
Palazzo Barberini May write this page sometime.
Stats
Diffs and thungs that may be handy sometime
- A little warning about Sandstein that the community have chosen to ignore, will be amusing to use in a few months. 13.IV.09
- Plague RFC I have a feeling this one will run.
- Explaining to Treasury Tag why I am sick of the peanut Gallery and Wehwalt. June 2010.
- June 2010. Wizardman slagging me off with rubbish.
- The dreadful affair of the Organ Grinder's Monkey!
- memo to Treasure Tag
- Theresa Knott on civility later refuses to appologise. my view
civility and opinions of Theresa Knott in 2008
Arbs 2009
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2009/Candidate statements
- Carcharoth (talk · contribs · email) (carcharothwpgmail.com)
- Cool Hand Luke (talk · contribs · email) (User.CoolHandLukegmail.com)
- Coren (talk · contribs · email) (marcuberbox.org)
- FayssalF (talk · contribs · email) (Fayssal Fertakh, szvestgmail.com)
- FloNight (talk · contribs · email)
- Jayvdb (talk · contribs · email) (John Vandenberg, jayvdbgmail.com)
- Newyorkbrad (talk · contribs · email) (newyorkbradgmail.com)
- Risker (talk · contribs · email)
- Rlevse (talk · contribs · email)
- Roger Davies (talk · contribs · email) (roger.davies.wikigmail.com)
- Stephen Bain (talk · contribs · email) (aka "bainer", formerly Thebainer, stephen.baingmail.com)
- Vassyana (talk · contribs · email) (Pete Sienkiewicz, vassyanagmail.com)
- Wizardman (talk · contribs · email) (wizardmanwikigmail.com)
Resigned arbs
- Casliber (talk · contribs · email)
- Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs · email) (kirill.lokshingmail.com)
- Sam Blacketer (talk · contribs · email) (sam.blacketergmail.com)
Something at the back of my brain, I know it's there, but where?
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Piotrus
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes
- This says it all really
Pages I may write
Diffs that are strangely familiar!
Something at the back of my brain, I know it's there, but where?
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/Piotrus
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes
- says it all really
2010
Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2010/Candidates
The community's aghast response
Am I paranoid?
I supose I must be if I imagine the diffs below.
- then the most extraordinary thing the whole mater being deleted against clear concensus and undeleted again following a huge battle. "
- 4-keeps & 2-deletes? is a consensus for deletion? GoodDay (talk) 19:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
- It is, if it puts Ms Kinney and Coren to shame - one rule for arbs, one for the rest of us. Giacomo 19:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
The curious case of BarkingMoon and double standrards
My thoughts on the arbcom etc
- We are dealing with people writing an online encyclopedia not attempting to bring down the Third Reich November 2010.
"4:Would you feel uncomfortable examining Jimbo's conduct, if he referred an action of his to ArbCom for review? Jd2718 02:01, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
The Arbcom should first look at the evidence and having made a final decision on its validity only then when considering sanctions and solutions consider the individual and his history and personality. So examining his conduct would be no problem - imposing sanctions would be interesting - No I would have no problem with it at all. Giano 09:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)" What a shame a later Arbcom just cowered in the corner. Giacomo Returned 18:00, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
userspace to mainspace
Silly templates that people like to see
| This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/CC-BY-SA-3.0Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0truetrue |