| Revision as of 02:25, 5 December 2017 editAlansohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers504,500 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:25, 5 December 2017 edit undoRusf10 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,121 edits →Bill ZankerNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ::We already have an article on the Learning Annex that covers this. There are some legitimate problems with this article. His various side projects/websites are not notable. And please stop the personal attacks. ] I could fill in the sentence "If it was up to me Alan Sohn would be...", but I'll refrain from doing so.--] (]) 02:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | ::We already have an article on the Learning Annex that covers this. There are some legitimate problems with this article. His various side projects/websites are not notable. And please stop the personal attacks. ] I could fill in the sentence "If it was up to me Alan Sohn would be...", but I'll refrain from doing so.--] (]) 02:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| :::You have an affirmative obligation under ] to check for notability and to see -- among other steps -- '''"If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources.'''" and that '''"The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects."'''{{pb}}It doesn't appear that you have done that here or for any of the other articles you've nominated for deletion. My argument that you should be banned from nominating articles for deletion is bade on that premise. Feel free to shae with us your analysis of the sources about Zander and to show how you followed WP:BEFORE. ] (]) 02:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | :::You have an affirmative obligation under ] to check for notability and to see -- among other steps -- '''"If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources.'''" and that '''"The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects."'''{{pb}}It doesn't appear that you have done that here or for any of the other articles you've nominated for deletion. My argument that you should be banned from nominating articles for deletion is bade on that premise. Feel free to shae with us your analysis of the sources about Zander and to show how you followed WP:BEFORE. ] (]) 02:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I think what is making you upset here is a conflict of interest ]. I have now noticed that both you and the subject of the article live in the same town. And to be honest with you, the article ] should not exist and neither should about half the articles on that list. Believe it or not, every mayor of Teaneck does not qualify for an article.--] (]) 05:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:25, 5 December 2017
Bill Zanker
- Bill Zanker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, Fails WP:BIO. Rusf10 (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 19:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU 19:28, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- Keep A founder of The Learning Annex is a credible claim of notability and there are sources in the article, yet all he nominator can come forth with is an assertion of "Not notable. Fails WP:BIO." I knew about Zanker, but anyone who didn't could look at the line that says "Find sources" and click on "news" or "HighBeam", both of which bring up dozens of articles about Zanker -- a serial entrepreneur who's been in the press for decades -- in reliable and verifiable sources. This is one more in a string of AfDs by a nominator who appears to demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of WP:BEFORE. Based on this pattern of evidence, I think it's past time to topic ban User:Rusf10 from AfD, and certainly from nominating any further articles. Alansohn (talk) 23:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- We already have an article on the Learning Annex that covers this. There are some legitimate problems with this article. His various side projects/websites are not notable. And please stop the personal attacks. Misplaced Pages:AFDEQ I could fill in the sentence "If it was up to me Alan Sohn would be...", but I'll refrain from doing so.--Rusf10 (talk) 02:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- You have an affirmative obligation under WP:BEFORE to check for notability and to see -- among other steps -- "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources." and that "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects."It doesn't appear that you have done that here or for any of the other articles you've nominated for deletion. My argument that you should be banned from nominating articles for deletion is bade on that premise. Feel free to shae with us your analysis of the sources about Zander and to show how you followed WP:BEFORE. Alansohn (talk) 02:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- I think what is making you upset here is a conflict of interest WP:COI. I have now noticed that both you and the subject of the article live in the same town. And to be honest with you, the article List of people from Teaneck, New Jersey should not exist and neither should about half the articles on that list. Believe it or not, every mayor of Teaneck does not qualify for an article.--Rusf10 (talk) 05:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- You have an affirmative obligation under WP:BEFORE to check for notability and to see -- among other steps -- "If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources." and that "The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects."It doesn't appear that you have done that here or for any of the other articles you've nominated for deletion. My argument that you should be banned from nominating articles for deletion is bade on that premise. Feel free to shae with us your analysis of the sources about Zander and to show how you followed WP:BEFORE. Alansohn (talk) 02:25, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- We already have an article on the Learning Annex that covers this. There are some legitimate problems with this article. His various side projects/websites are not notable. And please stop the personal attacks. Misplaced Pages:AFDEQ I could fill in the sentence "If it was up to me Alan Sohn would be...", but I'll refrain from doing so.--Rusf10 (talk) 02:09, 5 December 2017 (UTC)