Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 04:17, 27 December 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Elektricity, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Misplaced Pages
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri 14:23, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Deprodding of Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Amir Abdur Rehman Cheema, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBri 14:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Khurshid Ahmad (scholar) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Khurshid Ahmad (scholar) was changed by Elektricity (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92327 on 2017-11-12T07:32:28+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Khurshid Ahmad (scholar)

Ahmad is cited as the father of modern... is supported by the citation. Jim1138 (talk) 07:49, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138 (talk) I looked at the source and it says "a Father of modern...", not "The father". The source is not that reliable either, for a claim like this, I though a better source was needed. Elektricity (talk) 07:59, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

You're correct. My apology. I restored your edit. I see you also removed a lot of other junk! Thanks for the chat! Jim1138 (talk) 08:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Jim1138 (talk) Nps, Tak!

Farhat Hashmi

Hello my friend. I'm really sorry that I seem sometimes to undo or modify your edits on this particular page. I see you as a very good editor and I can see that you have the same goal as me: to keep the page accurate, neutral, well-referenced and helpful. Please don't take my edits personally. I'm actually trying to help. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

@ George Custer's Sabre (talk) On the contrary, I like your editing, it helps with the errors I make, like the incorrect thesis citation. I appreciate your taking the time to look through my edits and correcting them. I am now moving on to Roger Koppel. Although I will watchlist Farhat Hashmi and add a little bit now and then if I find any sources. Elektricity (talk) 06:11, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Oh great. Thank you very kindly. Best wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Human rights in India.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. Raymond3023 (talk) 05:49, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Stop wikihounding my contribution history by using brainless rationales on edit summaries. Raymond3023 (talk) 05:51, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, how are you. We seem to be engaged in a content dispute. I would like to keep the intersex rights page, while you want to remove the information and copy it to another page, then redirect the page. Also you want to remove intersex rights from the human rights in India page. Would you like to discuss? And please don't be rude, I know this is the internet and forum trolling is common, but lets keep it civil please! Can you give any reason as to why the mention of intersex should be removed? Elektricity (talk) 05:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Just like you redirected Times Higher Education–QS World University Rankings to QS World University Rankings just now, though you redirected a far older article and the main article is already too big. Raymond3023 (talk) 05:59, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@Raymond3023 (talk) but we are talking about your redirect. What reasons do you have of redirecting? And why are you removing information from the Human rights page? Please address both issues. My reason for redirection can be discussed in a separate paragraph if you wish to do so. Elektricity (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Hijra is synonym or another word for "intersex". See and then the page provided same sentences that are already mentioned on Hijra (South Asia), that's why a redirect was only choice. Raymond3023 (talk) 06:18, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@ Raymond3023 (talk) I don't agree. I think a separate article should be created. PErhaps we can ask other editors to give thier opinion? I am sure there are forums for that! Elektricity (talk) 06:27, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Not my problem if you don't agree with reliable sources. Before I consider taking you to WP:ANI for your on-going wikihounding, you need to stop it right here. Unless someone else is interested in taking up the discussion or removing the redirect, we will see. But so far you don't have to create drama. Raymond3023 (talk) 06:30, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@ Raymond3023 (talk) Perhaps you should take the matter to the ANI forum? Maybe the editors there will be able to give thier input. Please open up a discussion and I will give my input, or should I open up a discussion and you give your input? Elektricity (talk) 06:33, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Discussion is over now. Spend your energy somewhere else. Raymond3023 (talk) 06:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@ Raymond3023 (talk) ok. I'll just open that ANI thread to get input from other editors. There appears to be a lot fo activity on that forum. Please give your input there. Elektricity (talk) 06:39, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

See WP:BOOMERANG first. Raymond3023 (talk) 06:42, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Richard H. Griffiths

For shits and giggles, look at this version if you haven't already. The fluff to non-notability ratio was higher here than I've seen in a long time. Drmies (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@Drmies (talk) LORD ALMIGHTY! Ctrl+A -->Del. problem solved. :D Elektricity (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• Did you get an email from Griffiths? Drmies (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Drmies (talk) nope, I did not have that displeasure today. Elektricity (talk) 02:29, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

EU Business School

Hi Elektricity, You left me a message on my talk page. To review some history, kindly see the EU Business School talk page. Do not assume that there is edit warring when there is none. Reverted edition was not mine. The original article version had appropriately sourced content on relevant accreditations that were removed. User Lingveno was advised to refer any major and/or wholesale changes to the talk page to seek consensus as you would have seen from my comments. As this is a highly controversial article, I would suggest you do the same. Any new sections and/or changes can be added, but appropriately sourced and cited contents especially on accreditations (as this is an educational institution) must not be removed. I trust this explains the situation and your cooperation in this would be appreciated. Audit Guy (talk) 08:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Your revert

Please explain your note, and your revert. You are mistaken. On two counts. It is most certainly not a BLP violation. And as to refs -- they are not required in the lede. If they are in the text below. Where you can find an ample number of theme. Kindly revert yourself, or let's involve an admin to communicate with you on these issues. Or perhaps the learned editor, User:Centpacrr. --2604:2000:E016:A700:48AD:F0AC:6ECD:35D6 (talk) 04:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

@User:Centpacrr I will self revert. Elektricity (talk) 04:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)