| Revision as of 12:08, 14 January 2018 editDjflem (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers104,659 edits comment← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:03, 14 January 2018 edit undoAlansohn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers504,500 edits →Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey: reply re merge targetNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| :::Keep my big mouth shut? Please read ]. Notability is on a standalone basis. Do you oppose a merge to ] or do you simply refuse to comply with deletion policy? ] (]) 06:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | :::Keep my big mouth shut? Please read ]. Notability is on a standalone basis. Do you oppose a merge to ] or do you simply refuse to comply with deletion policy? ] (]) 06:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Second sentence of NPA, "Comment on content, not on the contributor.", maybe you need to read it. Almost every deletion discussion "the nominator this" or "the nominator that" And "keep your big mouth shut" (I'll say it again) is accurate reflection of the fact that you feel the need to add lengthy attacks on me to deletion discussions. The only reliable source that exists would be this: ] and that is simply not enough. There is nothing worth merging. A list of parks might be appropriate in the Montclair article buts that's it.--] (]) 07:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | ::::Second sentence of NPA, "Comment on content, not on the contributor.", maybe you need to read it. Almost every deletion discussion "the nominator this" or "the nominator that" And "keep your big mouth shut" (I'll say it again) is accurate reflection of the fact that you feel the need to add lengthy attacks on me to deletion discussions. The only reliable source that exists would be this: ] and that is simply not enough. There is nothing worth merging. A list of parks might be appropriate in the Montclair article buts that's it.--] (]) 07:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::::I have commented on content *AND* I will comment on your continuing abuse of process and failure by the nominator to follow policy. The persistent failure to comply with policy regarding consideration of a merge only adds to the problems you've created and refused to address. If you've got a problem, why not run off to ] for the third, fourth and fifth time. The previous attempts haven't accomplished much. ] (]) 21:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Merge to ]''' This park is one of several along the course of the brook and would be the approprpriate place for such info] (]) 12:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | *'''Merge to ]''' This park is one of several along the course of the brook and would be the approprpriate place for such info] (]) 12:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
| **'''Note:''' I would also support ] as a merge target. ] (]) 21:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:03, 14 January 2018
Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey
- Yantacaw Brook Park, New Jersey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a municipal park, it does not meet WP:GNG. There is no sourcing other than link to a list of Montclair parks. The contents of the article seem to be original research WP:OR. Also does not meet criteria for inclusion as per WP:NOTTRAVEL. DEPRODED by User:Djflem because the article has existed since 2008. Longevity is never a valid reason to keep an article. Rusf10 (talk) 23:42, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- COMMENT: The edit sumary said exists since 2008; could be merged; part of series. Please don't cherry pick to misrepresent other eidtors. Fact stands that it could be easily merged and that is it is part of a template/series which adds to comprehensive coverage in Misplaced PagesDjflem (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete -- Fails GNG. Rhadow (talk) 02:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete This municipal park does not meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:42, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge / Redirect to Montclair, New Jersey Sadly, the nominator patently refuses to comply with WP:BEFORE, which requires seeking alternatives to deletion. Furthermore, the box that displays above this page when editing rather clearly states "When discussing an article, remember to consider alternatives to deletion. If you think the article could be a disambiguation page, redirected or merged to another article, then consider recommending "Disambiguation", "Redirect" or "Merge" instead of deletion. Similarly, if another editor has proposed an alternative to deletion but you think the article should be deleted instead, please elaborate why.""Why?" is indeed the question. Why do we continue to tolerate the abuse of process here at AfD from an editor who refuses to comply with policy? Alansohn (talk) 06:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Alansohn:If you got a problem, take it to the proper venue or keep you big mouth shut. If you want to comment here, talk about the article, not me. Maybe you can explain why a park that can't even be properly sourced deserves mentioning anywhere.--Rusf10 (talk) 06:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep my big mouth shut? Please read WP:NPA. Notability is on a standalone basis. Do you oppose a merge to Montclair, New Jersey or do you simply refuse to comply with deletion policy? Alansohn (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Second sentence of NPA, "Comment on content, not on the contributor.", maybe you need to read it. Almost every deletion discussion "the nominator this" or "the nominator that" And "keep your big mouth shut" (I'll say it again) is accurate reflection of the fact that you feel the need to add lengthy attacks on me to deletion discussions. The only reliable source that exists would be this: ] and that is simply not enough. There is nothing worth merging. A list of parks might be appropriate in the Montclair article buts that's it.--Rusf10 (talk) 07:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- I have commented on content *AND* I will comment on your continuing abuse of process and failure by the nominator to follow policy. The persistent failure to comply with policy regarding consideration of a merge only adds to the problems you've created and refused to address. If you've got a problem, why not run off to WP:ANI for the third, fourth and fifth time. The previous attempts haven't accomplished much. Alansohn (talk) 21:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Second sentence of NPA, "Comment on content, not on the contributor.", maybe you need to read it. Almost every deletion discussion "the nominator this" or "the nominator that" And "keep your big mouth shut" (I'll say it again) is accurate reflection of the fact that you feel the need to add lengthy attacks on me to deletion discussions. The only reliable source that exists would be this: ] and that is simply not enough. There is nothing worth merging. A list of parks might be appropriate in the Montclair article buts that's it.--Rusf10 (talk) 07:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep my big mouth shut? Please read WP:NPA. Notability is on a standalone basis. Do you oppose a merge to Montclair, New Jersey or do you simply refuse to comply with deletion policy? Alansohn (talk) 06:43, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Alansohn:If you got a problem, take it to the proper venue or keep you big mouth shut. If you want to comment here, talk about the article, not me. Maybe you can explain why a park that can't even be properly sourced deserves mentioning anywhere.--Rusf10 (talk) 06:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Merge to Yantacaw Brook This park is one of several along the course of the brook and would be the approprpriate place for such infoDjflem (talk) 12:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: I would also support Yantacaw Brook as a merge target. Alansohn (talk) 21:03, 14 January 2018 (UTC)