Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sławomir Borewicz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:54, 18 October 2006 editEncyclopaedia Editing Dude (talk | contribs)1,801 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 08:07, 18 October 2006 edit undoLysy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers21,125 edits WP:POINTNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
Errr, I don't get something: why is it not at ]?--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 06:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC) Errr, I don't get something: why is it not at ]?--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 06:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
:Just give him one more barnstar straight away for yet another trol... great Wiki contribution, as you always do. We need more edits like this. These edits make Wiki a great place to be ] 06:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC) :Just give him one more barnstar straight away for yet another trol... great Wiki contribution, as you always do. We need more edits like this. These edits make Wiki a great place to be ] 06:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
----
I'm afraid that the article's title is a ] and it should be renamed. Unless I totally misunderstood this of course. --]<sup>]</sup> 08:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:07, 18 October 2006

Errr, I don't get something: why is it not at Sławomir Borewicz?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  06:39, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Just give him one more barnstar straight away for yet another trol... great Wiki contribution, as you always do. We need more edits like this. These edits make Wiki a great place to be Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 06:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm afraid that the article's title is a WP:POINT and it should be renamed. Unless I totally misunderstood this of course. --Lysy 08:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)