| Revision as of 20:09, 16 October 2006 editTankred (talk | contribs)7,836 editsm vandalism warning template test4← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:49, 19 October 2006 edit undoVinceB (talk | contribs)1,493 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ''This page is rubber frendly.'' | ''This page is rubber frendly.'' | ||
| == User:Slovan == | |||
| You just blocked my roommate for indef. <small>Yes, I live in a college</small> --] 01:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| And as far as I know, logging in is not a must. I wrote the sign on my userpage that "''I nearly always do anonim edits instead of using this account''" so accusing me of sockpuppetry or such assumpion that I wanted to avoid the 3RR is false. A: I'm not the only one making contribs from Hungary B: I always stopped at the limit. <small>Check it leisurely.</small> But yes, that's true that I'm quite short tempered. I learned the lession abt this. All what is proven is that I wrote a true sentence on my userpage. And I got a block for it. pff...--] 01:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Well, your roommate can post to his own talk page even while blocked. He can post {{tl|unblock}} and give a reason. The roommate excuse is frequently given, sometimes it is true and sometimes not. I would like the case to reviewed by someone else. Of course, your roommate's account was recognized by users familiar with your editing habits; if he had different interests, no one would have had the idea to check. As far as editing while logged out is concerned, it's not really sockpuppet behavior, but if it is done to avoid accountability for 3RR or other problems then it's wrong no matter what it is called. I will keep an eye on your talk pages to see what other editors think. ] 02:09, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::As to the Slovan account, let us compare Slovan's edit with the previous edit by VinceB's puppet 195.56.224.133 . They are the same. Both Slovan and the puppet appeared to support VinceB's particular point of view against PANONIAN. As for the allegedly legitimate anonymous edits, VinceB refused my suspicion that he/she had ever used the 195.56... IPs and he/she even called my initiation of the formal CheckUser procedure a "personal attack" . For being one of two editors who exposed the connection between VinceB, Slovan, and the IPs, I have been harassed at Misplaced Pages:Personal attack intervention noticeboard and Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. The "personal attack warning" templates have been placed by VinceB on my talk page. I will quote VinceB's reason: "''I know that I didn't used sockpuppets, beause I has a username here.''" Please compare it with the present version "''I nearly always do anonim edits instead of using this account''". In other words, after the CheckUser confirmed his/her sockpuppetry, VinceB's version of the events was changed from not knowing the 195.56...s into using them in a benign way. I am sorry, but I do not buy it. The use of sockpuppets to vandalize articles and to create impression that a controversial edit is supported by more than one editor is not legitimate at all in my opinion. Therefore, I must oppose any relaxation of the measures (unblocking Slovan). On the other hand, I would like to believe that VinceB has learnt his/her lesson and his/her future edits will be more constructive. ] 21:51, 12 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| We live in the same flat. I spoke about you and your behaviour. Of course we share opinions in some ways. Tankred, you are simply ] now. --] 12:09, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] is your or PANONIAN's sock/meatpuppet? --] 17:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :I have never used any sockpuppets, but feel free to initiate the CheckUser procedure to prove it. After I reviewed Otu2's edits, I am pretty sure that even the country of our IPs will be different. I would like also to recommend you not to delete relevant information, such as a note explaining why the number of Hungarians living in a city increased from 8% to 40% in 30 years , a well-sourced description of a political party as nationalist by leading political science journals (e.g. Party Politics) and mainstream media (e.g. BBC), or the historical context of the current events. If you keep going in this way, I will have to ask a third party to review your disruptive edits. Please, do not forget, that you have already been blocked for sockpuppetry and you have a long record of vandalism and personal attacks (up to Npa3). Please, learn a lesson from your last block and try to be more constructive. ] 19:54, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. <br>The next time you ] a page, you ''will'' be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. <!-- Template:Test4 (Fourth level warning) --> | |||
| *You have received many warnings in the past. You cannot just blank whole paragraphs, including numerical data, because of your political views. And why are you constantly erasing geographic names? This is an English Misplaced Pages and you should use English geographic names, not the Hungarian ones. This is really your last warning before I ask administrators for help. You are wasting time of other editors which could be spent on writing articles. ] 20:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:49, 19 October 2006
This page is rubber frendly.