| Revision as of 14:59, 22 February 2018 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,318 editsm Signing comment by Squatch347 - "→Jewish Views on Slavery: new section"← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:24, 22 February 2018 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,260 edits February 2018. Keep it civil, please. As you know, admins have wide discretionary powers to place any sanctions that are necessary for keeping editing and discussions in the India-Pakistan area constructive.Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Hi, I was reviewing your most recent addition to the Jewish views on slavery page. I noticed that you added that the Biblical concept was to treat slaves as chattel. No argument that that is what that source says, but I don't think that that represents the consensus opinion of historians. Curious if you were up to having a quick discussion about it? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Hi, I was reviewing your most recent addition to the Jewish views on slavery page. I noticed that you added that the Biblical concept was to treat slaves as chattel. No argument that that is what that source says, but I don't think that that represents the consensus opinion of historians. Curious if you were up to having a quick discussion about it? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 14:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| ==February 2018== | |||
| Hi, JosephusOfJerusalem. Please note that Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project. Your editing is very aggressive, and I'm especially offended by the bad-faith-assuming edit summaries with which you remove messages from this talkpage, such as , , and . That's especially striking since you're highly offended when you believe somebody else doesn't assume good faith, even to the point of taking them to ] for it. Please speak to others as you would like to be spoken to. As you know, admins have wide discretionary powers to place any sanctions that are necessary for keeping editing and discussions in the India-Pakistan area constructive and civil. | |||
| Your proficient use of Misplaced Pages jargon and noticeboards makes me very dubious that you were a new user when you registered in October 2017. The comment that used to be on your userpage, that you 'have been examining the Misplaced Pages policies and procedures', doesn't convince me. Is there anything you'd like to share about any previous account/s? Abandoning an old account and starting a new one is acceptable, and you don't have to tell me about it, provided you avoid "becoming involved in disputes, edit warring or other forms of disruptive editing" in the same areas as before, per ], and of course provided any old account is not blocked. ] | ] 17:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 17:24, 22 February 2018
Tendentious editing
Hi, it is fine to have a disagreement and a discussion about that disagreement but when umpteen people with vast experience are telling you that you are wrong, it is usually not a good idea to keep banging the drum with exactly the same arguments, over and over. That might be considered tendentious behaviour. I think you may soon need to re-assess what you are doing at the WP:NORN thread and elsewhere in relation to the election figures. - Sitush (talk) 12:10, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Jewish Views on Slavery
Hi, I was reviewing your most recent addition to the Jewish views on slavery page. I noticed that you added that the Biblical concept was to treat slaves as chattel. No argument that that is what that source says, but I don't think that that represents the consensus opinion of historians. Curious if you were up to having a quick discussion about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squatch347 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
Hi, JosephusOfJerusalem. Please note that Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project. Your editing is very aggressive, and I'm especially offended by the bad-faith-assuming edit summaries with which you remove messages from this talkpage, such as here, here, and here. That's especially striking since you're highly offended when you believe somebody else doesn't assume good faith, even to the point of taking them to WP:AE for it. Please speak to others as you would like to be spoken to. As you know, admins have wide discretionary powers to place any sanctions that are necessary for keeping editing and discussions in the India-Pakistan area constructive and civil.
Your proficient use of Misplaced Pages jargon and noticeboards makes me very dubious that you were a new user when you registered in October 2017. The comment that used to be on your userpage, that you 'have been examining the Misplaced Pages policies and procedures', doesn't convince me. Is there anything you'd like to share about any previous account/s? Abandoning an old account and starting a new one is acceptable, and you don't have to tell me about it, provided you avoid "becoming involved in disputes, edit warring or other forms of disruptive editing" in the same areas as before, per WP:CLEANSTART, and of course provided any old account is not blocked. Bishonen | talk 17:22, 22 February 2018 (UTC).