| Revision as of 20:23, 26 February 2018 editFustos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,545 edits usual nonsense from wolfchild← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:29, 27 February 2018 edit undoThewolfchild (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers51,833 edits Warning: Edit warring on List of military special forces units. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 09:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == February 2018 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware that ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''{{Break}}''<br>'''Note: this is just like last time. You refuse to discuss it on the talk page, and just keep on reverting. Like last time, I'm asking you to stop with notice, and discuss. If you just continue reverting, then like the last time you'll get reported again, but the blocks get longer and longer each time. Please stop edit-warring and discuss the issue. Thank you'''''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> - <span style="text-shadow:#E05FFF 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">'']''</span> 04:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:29, 27 February 2018
Fustos, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Fustos! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 22 August 2017 (UTC) |
August 2017
Hello, I'm Slazenger. I noticed that in this edit to Naval Infantry (Russia), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 08:55, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
101st Airborne Division
Please quit removing well sourced information from this page.Fury 1991 (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Fury 1991
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Fustos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
WP:3O notification
As per your suggestion, I have requested a WP:3O. M.Bitton (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
- ok. let's see what happens. Fustos (talk) 22:18, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Danny Amendola
I disagree with your addition of adding the nickname 'Danny Playoff' to the introduction section of the article Danny Amendola for a number of reasons:
1) Per the Misplaced Pages use of nicknames guidelines, it is more pertinent to inform the reader that Daniel James Amendola is colloquially known as 'Danny'. Everyone recognizes his name as Danny. There is NO debate.
2) The nickname 'Danny Playoff' is a very new nickname provided by a teammate and used by some teammates and media. But they ALSO refer to him as 'Playoff 'Dola' - hence the nickname 'Danny Playoff' is not yet colloquial. It is not like Ed 'Too Tall' Jones who became known by that name.
3) The mention of this new nickname 'Danny Playoff' is already included in the story.
4) I am a HUGE New England Patriots fan and Danny Amendola fan. He is 'Danny Playoff' - but it is not yet a name that the general NFL public knows him by. They know him as Danny.
Go Pats! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbossoxx (talk • contribs) 13:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Federer as greatest athlete?
This is not supported by sources to use the term "many" in terms of athlete. It's debatable whether it should be in the lead at all. Please back up this claim on the talk page so we can all debate the issue. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- then leave out the "many" or "some" and have something like RF "has been describes as...". having "some" and "many" just sounds odd. Fustos (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
- That's fine if you can make it stick with other editors, but you can't use unsupported "many" with his athletic prowess. Or it could be in separate sentences. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Nina L. Khrushcheva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to American
- Yang Hengjun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chinese
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
February 2018
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of military special forces units. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Note: this is just like last time. You refuse to discuss it on the talk page, and just keep on reverting. Like last time, I'm asking you to stop with notice, and discuss. If you just continue reverting, then like the last time you'll get reported again, but the blocks get longer and longer each time. Please stop edit-warring and discuss the issue. Thank you - WOLFchild 04:29, 27 February 2018 (UTC)