| Revision as of 09:11, 18 March 2018 editChaheel Riens (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers38,540 edits →Your disagreements with INDICATOR2018: +heading← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:31, 18 March 2018 edit undoO1lI0 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,216 edits Reverted to revision 830968580 by O1lI0 (talk): See Re in your talk page. (TW)Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 234: | Line 234: | ||
| I have blocked INDICATOR2018 for three days, for edit-warring, editing to promote a point of view, and other disruptive editing. However, I advise you to think carefully about the way you have interacted with that editor, as your actions have not always been above reproach, and too could find yourself blocked if you are not careful. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 14:35, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | I have blocked INDICATOR2018 for three days, for edit-warring, editing to promote a point of view, and other disruptive editing. However, I advise you to think carefully about the way you have interacted with that editor, as your actions have not always been above reproach, and too could find yourself blocked if you are not careful. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "]" (]) 14:35, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :Emotional control and belief conflict are always there.At the moment I can do only emotional control.--] (]) 14:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | :Emotional control and belief conflict are always there.At the moment I can do only emotional control.--] (]) 14:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == Misleading/inappropriate templates on talk pages == | |||
| Can you clarify, before you simply revert & delete this section - you have reinstated an inaccurate and unnecessary template on an editors page with the summary of "I said ''There are other better ways to change the data, like updating.''" - where exactly do you state this? All I can see is this edit summary of ''"Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Greenwich, Connecticut"'' as per the standard template on the editors talk page, and this summary of ''"Reverting vandalism or test edit"'' on your original edit . You then tag the article . The removal was accompanied with the edit summary of ''"Removed outdated statistic from 12 years ago"'' - which is exactly what they did. If you disagree, then you are within your rights to revert, but not to also hit them with a vandalism template, or use misleading summaries when doing so. ] (]) 09:10, 18 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:31, 18 March 2018
|
if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the Welcome!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, O1lI0! Thank you for your contributions. I am 78.26 and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:12, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
O1lI0, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi O1lI0! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC) |
Twinkle
Did you know how to use WP:TWINKLE to revert vandalism? click on "Preferences", and than click on "Gadgets", view on "Browsing" to find "Twinkle:", than click on the box to tick, scroll down to click on "Save". SA 13 Bro (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
Hello, I'm Uncle Milty. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shane Black have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. | Uncle Milty | talk | 20:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- The IP 181.88.184.210 removed content at Shane Black article on 17 May that you're restored actually was vandalism did by IP 2602:306:3088:9910:c096:e99d:d31b:2559, please be caution on that. Please also take note WP:NEIPIAV, the IP 181.88.184.210 removed content is not vandal. SA 13 Bro (talk) 23:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks.--O1lI0 (talk) 04:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Lao Division 1 League
Not sure what you're trying to do with your edits here. I have declined the CSD and contested the prod. If you believe the article to be non-notable, please take to AfD. Fenix down (talk) 09:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi O1lI0! You created a thread called Delivered by Tigraan-testbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing |
Just to let you know
I've declined three CSD nominations you made under WP:G1 for user subpages. Firstly, G1 is for pages composed entirely of nonsense, which these were not. Secondly, G1 does not apply to pages in the user space. Basalisk ⁄berate 16:40, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
- I got it.--O1lI0 (talk) 10:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- I have just deleted Template:Taxonomy/Australian under G7, but you marked it, as above, as G1 nonsense, which it was rather obviously not. I suppose it might have presented that way if you don't have any familiarity with template coding. Regardless, please be careful, because that is a rather bitey type of tagging to get wrong, and should not be done unless you are fairly sure you're correct when pressing save, which could not have been true here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
SD edit conflict on Jiaxing_City_Xingjia_Automobile_Spare_Part_Manufacture_Co.,_Ltd.
already self - reverted. We were editing within an hour of each other and I was kinda slow due to other work going on at the time. many thanks Edaham (talk) 09:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- I got it.--O1lI0 (talk) 10:35, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Sock puppetry accusation
Hi, O1lI0. I have never used any account other than this one or have performed any COI edits. I would like to know what makes you to think so. LUMINR (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
- See your talk page.--O1lI0 (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
September 2017
The IP addresses you reported are all mobile addresses, and as such, they are subject to rapid change, so unless vandalism is actively occurring, blocks are useless. By DoRD
- He is right.--O1lI0 (talk) 22:55, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, and thank you for removing vandalism from Multimedia. We appreciate this, but unfortunately your edit was not successful in restoring the article to its pre-vandalised state. For future reference, it is better to deal with vandalism by checking the article's page history to determine how it appeared before it was vandalised. You can then restore the whole article, or the relevant part of it, to an appropriate earlier version. If you simply delete the visible vandalism then any content removed or overwritten by the vandal is lost. See How to deal with vandalism for details. Thank you.—J. M. (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi
this is a slightly incorrect edit summary. I completely agree with your edit. That was exactly my thought when I made same edit first time. Thank you! My very best wishes (talk) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Re 2
That page is not your talk page.--O1lI0 (talk) 16:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Next time please explain first.--O1lI0 (talk) 17:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
Thank you for making a report on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Misplaced Pages and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 17:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Li Jiancheng
May I suggest that you back off Li Jiancheng for the time being? You are edit warring just as much as Elainr is, and they at least have the excuse of being new around here. Reverting every change they make and leaving strongly-worded warnings on their talk page is rather bitey, and to be honest your edit summaries, as well as the ill-informed AfD, betray the fact that you don't really understand the policies that you are trying to cite either.
They are trying to improve the article, so if you'll take my advice: assume good faith, give them some space to edit, and review their changes once they've finished. – Joe (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
removing tag
i have removed the tags with request for photographs as they are already have photographs for Gleydson Carvalho André Chaumeix Louis Black Clarence Black — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.151.245 (talk) 19:19, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
Question
Please how can you blank an entire page here? Do you think you're deleting it or what? please explain. — Ammarpad (talk) 03:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, O1lI0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your edit summary
What do you mean by "sock" here? --NeilN 15:07, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
1.Personal attack
- (-165) . . 1960 Chinese Mount Everest expedition (Undid revision 816274745 by O1lI0 (talk) Keeping attacking my edits on unrelated topics is just driven by bigotry. No need to cover up)
- You don’t need to tell him about that—“edit warring” like this has already happened several times, and he knows that. It’s me that he is targeting, not the article itself.
- A search into O1lI0's edit history () revealed a long history of edit conflicts with Chinese Wikipedians on a variety of unrelated topics. Some are reasonable indeed, but many more are not. Please consider this when viewing this report, thanks!
- @NeilN:If my blocked means 3RR, I can accept it. But if it's blocked by a false personal attack I think you're insulting my personality. His personal attacks have made me think my personality has been insulted.
2.Sock
- https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/172.58.225.201 Only 172.58.225.201.
3.A sentence should I use guy rather than guys.
- Chaheel Riens misunderstood something because of this.
4.1 and 2 are different things.
- The common point is to make me feel like my talk page becomes a junkyard. But 1 is not 2.O1lI0 (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Noped Emmanuel
Give him a chance, he clearly doesn't understand how Misplaced Pages works. If he carries on doing it I will block him eventually, but we can only try. Black Kite (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, dealing with this type of user is very tired and easily become the target of attack.
- Recently there are others who attacked me with multiple IPs, and based on my tracking, they may come back.O1lI0 (talk) 13:52, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
January 2018
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
O1lI0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@HJ Mitchell:IP tracks and harass me and even to other wikis such as Japanese and Malay.The IP also goes to question my use of IP to do the same thing(like using sock) as he does.He just keeps track of my editors forcing me to edit the war.Is also in Japanese Wiki created fake content and was quickly removed. O1lI0 (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked for edit warring. You haven't given any reason to believe you aren't edit-warring. In fact, you acknowledge that you are. As such, the block is appropriate. Yamla (talk) 13:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Speedy deletion declined: User:Dingdongblop/sandbox
Hello O1lI0. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Dingdongblop/sandbox, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G1 doesn't apply to userspace. This is the perfect place for such tests. Thank you. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:34, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
arbitration request
Hello. I would like to inform you that the recent case request in which you were listed as party has been removed as frivolous. If you still believe that dispute resolution is needed, please read WP:DR and pick the venue that appears most suitable to you. --Kostas20142 (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Done. But when is it?
Your disagreements with INDICATOR2018
I have blocked INDICATOR2018 for three days, for edit-warring, editing to promote a point of view, and other disruptive editing. However, I advise you to think carefully about the way you have interacted with that editor, as your actions have not always been above reproach, and too could find yourself blocked if you are not careful. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:35, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- Emotional control and belief conflict are always there.At the moment I can do only emotional control.--O1lI0 (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2018 (UTC)