| Revision as of 02:12, 21 March 2018 editCall me when you get the chance (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,912 edits →WP:ANI: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:10, 21 March 2018 edit undoJbhunley (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,645 edits →WP:ANI: noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 01:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC) | ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 01:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :Look, I'll try not to do that again, I promise. ] (]/]) 02:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC) | :Look, I'll try not to do that again, I promise. ] (]/]) 02:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::You should give ] and ] a read. Also, when you leave a note — and I give you credit for not just using a vandal template, you should leave a ''polite'' note explaining what the editor did wrong. By doing this not only do you educate the other editor you also give yourself a kind of crosscheck. If you can not articulate what they did wrong ''and why it was, per policy or guideline wrong'' then you should not be leaving a warning. If you found the edit incorrect for some other reason, explain your concern rather than just jumping on the other editor. {{pb}} Consider this note I am writing to you, and imagine if instead of explaining I jumped on you in the same way you jumped on the IP editor? Always remember you are addressing your comments to a person. Maybe they actually are a jerk or a vandal but, ] you must assume, at least at first, that they are not. Also, good job on owning up and apologizing at ANI. That takes character. I wish more people would do that. ]] 03:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:10, 21 March 2018
Call me when you get the chance, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Call me when you get the chance! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 18 May 2017 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Call me when you get the chance. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Conven-i-ence trout.
|
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something silly. |
~~ ∫uℂρЭ ℝ0υĜe 21:59, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
- Heh heh. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 22:03, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
missing wednesday text or "C'mon that's today's news"
I was attempting to add an item on Wed P&E when got conflict alert. Existing content| one item from Wed appeared in Thursday with some extraneous coding. The rest of Wednesday's content had disappeared, including Wed header
-- multiple attempts to fix - whatever you did worked, mine didn't. Thanks. RaqiwasSushi (talk) 02:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- No problem, RS. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 15:40, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 2.28.13.202 (talk) 01:47, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- Look, I'll try not to do that again, I promise. Call me when you get the chance (We need to talk/It ain't easy) 02:12, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
- You should give WP:VANDAL and WP:NOTVANDAL a read. Also, when you leave a note — and I give you credit for not just using a vandal template, you should leave a polite note explaining what the editor did wrong. By doing this not only do you educate the other editor you also give yourself a kind of crosscheck. If you can not articulate what they did wrong and why it was, per policy or guideline wrong then you should not be leaving a warning. If you found the edit incorrect for some other reason, explain your concern rather than just jumping on the other editor. Consider this note I am writing to you, and imagine if instead of explaining I jumped on you in the same way you jumped on the IP editor? Always remember you are addressing your comments to a person. Maybe they actually are a jerk or a vandal but, per policy you must assume, at least at first, that they are not. Also, good job on owning up and apologizing at ANI. That takes character. I wish more people would do that. Jbh 03:10, 21 March 2018 (UTC)