Revision as of 14:18, 6 May 2018 editD4iNa4 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,548 edits →Your reintroductions← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:28, 12 May 2018 edit undoJosephusOfJerusalem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users905 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
::When I get a chance I will try to fix this. I think you made some great saves where some improper editor removed names that should be there. Without question. But you also without question roughly and without an explanation in the edit summary removed proper ce edits that were improvements. And I believe that for the reasons I said the less notable names should be removed, as they have been for years over time, as we keep the list manageable, because without this this list would of course look like all the relevant categories, which would be too long for our purposes. But I will try to fix this in a way that you and I, I hope, think will be proper - even though to be honest I think the rules are that you both should not make a blanket revert where you are reverting what even you would agree are for example proper ce edits - the rules don't allow that, and they also ask that you leave an edit summary when reverting an editor that gives a good reason for reverting them, which is not the case in for example those ce edits which I think you agree with. Anyway, it is more important, of these three issues, that you caught the deletes of Green and other major athletes, and without you that would not have been noticed, and I thank you for that. That was great. ] (]) 04:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC) | ::When I get a chance I will try to fix this. I think you made some great saves where some improper editor removed names that should be there. Without question. But you also without question roughly and without an explanation in the edit summary removed proper ce edits that were improvements. And I believe that for the reasons I said the less notable names should be removed, as they have been for years over time, as we keep the list manageable, because without this this list would of course look like all the relevant categories, which would be too long for our purposes. But I will try to fix this in a way that you and I, I hope, think will be proper - even though to be honest I think the rules are that you both should not make a blanket revert where you are reverting what even you would agree are for example proper ce edits - the rules don't allow that, and they also ask that you leave an edit summary when reverting an editor that gives a good reason for reverting them, which is not the case in for example those ce edits which I think you agree with. Anyway, it is more important, of these three issues, that you caught the deletes of Green and other major athletes, and without you that would not have been noticed, and I thank you for that. That was great. ] (]) 04:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::I have the edits that you had made. You can remove the names you don't think should be there, but remove them only when you have obvious reasons on which everyone would agree with you. ] (]) 14:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC) | :::I have the edits that you had made. You can remove the names you don't think should be there, but remove them only when you have obvious reasons on which everyone would agree with you. ] (]) 14:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
==AE notification== | |||
There is a discussion about your behaviour at ]. ] (]) 07:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:28, 12 May 2018
Welcome to my talk page! Hello! Please leave a new message. I will respond to your message as soon as possible. Thanks and happy editing! Also take care of the following points:
|
Misleading edit summary in Reincarnation
Claiming you are reverting the last edit (your own!) when actually just adding a space is simply dishonest. Clean Copy 00:03, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Clean Copy the edit was made per WP:DUMMY, sometimes editors miss adding edit summary when it is recommended to provide it. In order to fix that, we can make a WP:COSMETICEDIT edit and put edit summary to describe previous edit that contained no edit summary. D4iNa4 (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Can you check this article
Take a look and check the sources of Chandraseniya Kayastha Prabhu. I have just removed one source that was incorrectly used for supporting the info not found in the source, but there may be more. 223.229.170.82 (talk) 03:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, D4iNa4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Hello, I'm Russianvodka. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Misplaced Pages with an accurate edit summary (which I appreciate you doing this on the LGBT Rights in India article). If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. When you want to change an article's content that has been the accepted version for more than a few days, you need to discuss your intended actions before you make the edit. Thanks 01:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Russianvodka (talk) 06:27, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashvamedha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celtic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018! | |
Hello D4iNa4, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Discretionary Sanctions Notification
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Misplaced Pages. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Template:Z33 power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
Discussion
@Callanecc: Hi. I am not at all familiar with this case, but would you please take a look at this diff? Both the accounts D4iNa4, and Yogesh Khandke are being used at the same time. —usernamekiran(talk) 17:56, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- An SPI was filed under the name of Yogesh Khandke, but that's it. It happens a lot of time that an SPI is filed under the name of an editor, but it reveals socks of a totally different editor, and the block log contains the link to the SPI that originally led the discovery of socks of the editor, even if it the accounts are unrelated to the formerly alleged sockmaster. D4iNa4 (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. I am not against you or anything as such. We have never even had communication yet. It is just, I am confused by all this. I hope you understand.
So, in simple words, you and Yogesh Khandke are different persons? —usernamekiran(talk) 19:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. I am not against you or anything as such. We have never even had communication yet. It is just, I am confused by all this. I hope you understand.
- D4iNa4 and Yogesh Khandke are Unrelated. See Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/D4iNa4 and Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Yogesh Khandke as separate SPIs. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 22:52, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. I had already seen both the SPIs, and I was confused because of the result of 23 April 2014 at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Yogesh Khandke/Archive. See you around guys :) —usernamekiran(talk) 08:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
A bit confused
re special:diff/829121558 I am not sure where in this template I am supposed to reply to you. Do I create a new section?
Also I'm wondering if it could be rephrased to be more specific as I had said a lot of things there. ScratchMarshall (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
Dalit Panthers
Hi D4iNa4
The reference in the Dalit Panthers article you changed to in this edit i.e. this url does not work. Could you please correct ot revert this? thanks - Arjayay (talk) 17:08, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
- I was restoring last good version there. Have corrected title and not just URL. D4iNa4 (talk) 14:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
your deletion of scholarly citation with out citing any reason appears to be suspicious
you have recently deleted a scholarly citation on the article Bhimbetka rock shelters with out specifying any reason for the deletion. So the edit made by you have been restored. If you have any valid reason, lets discuss it here.. Thank you ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Banasura (talk • contribs) 12:55, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- If you want to see something sadly amusing, see his talk page. It didn't end well. Doug Weller talk 16:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- Sad indeed. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:09, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
== Dont delete my suggestions to the Talk page of Bhimbetka rock shelters` ==
The talk page is for discussing about article. I have made a suggestion there. You have removed it with out saying any reasons.
YOu have also removed the opinion of Klaus Klaustermeiyer added to that opinion with out specifying any reason.
When you remove something, you should state the reason..
Just your vigour to hide certain content is not enough reason to remove some content.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.236.155 (talk) 18:30, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Article redirect. NeilN 11:11, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- That's twice you've deleted my posts there. Are you not getting edit conflicts? --NeilN 11:48, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- 7 times in total.. D4iNa4 (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Here too. Please change the way you deal with them. --NeilN 11:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Internet got slow throughout these moments. Fixed it, now it's working well. D4iNa4 (talk) 12:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Here too. Please change the way you deal with them. --NeilN 11:56, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- 7 times in total.. D4iNa4 (talk) 11:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
For your efforts to protect the NPOV and scholarly -based contents. Kufarhunter (talk) 13:07, 27 March 2018 (UTC) |
Edit conflicts
Probably want to take things one comment at a time, especially on mobile where most people type slower, and where it's harder to quickly resolve an edit conflict correctly, before you end up getting more edit conflicts while you try to fix your first edit conflict. GMG 19:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Don't attack me again. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=836287715&oldid=836287297 This is not even remotely okay and if you do it again I will bring this up with an administrator. Also PLEASE, learn how to handle edit conflicts. That same edit shows you undoing a previous edit. You will be blocked quite quickly if you don't stop doing that. It's a big deal here, editing someone else's comments. You would be wise to stop arguing for once and listen to the good advice people are giving you. --Tarage (talk) 04:07, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yet no admin took action because it was not an "attack", but an analysis of the situation in hand. There were edit conflicts, but I had already changed device and then made multiple edits after the diff you have linked, thus there is nothing ongoing that I would need to "stop doing". I haven't argued over any "advice" until now. FWIW, your messages came much after the thread was already closed, with Farawahar promising to leave Misplaced Pages for sometime. The thread was archived at 4:24. This case is already closed now. D4iNa4 (talk) 11:26, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Notification issues
D4iNa4, my understanding is that a recent notification, or evidence or recent awareness, is necessary before any action can be taken. The reason for this is that the sanctions may have been modified (eased or made stricter or lifted) if a lot of time has elapsed since the previous action or notification. Though it is moot in this case because Js82 is blocked and because I don't think any thing actionable occurred anyway, I suggest that you notify editors who haven't received a notification in the last 365 days proactively so as to avoid getting into this sort of muddle. Or, if you think my reading is incorrect, you could ask for a clarification from arbcom. --regentspark (comment) 14:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- He was topic banned for 6 months topic ban under WP:ARBIPA, and this topic ban was never modified or removed.
- WP:ARCA would be the proper venue, though I am not yet ready to fill all of its form and the main issue is moot since the user has been indeffed. For now I have invited an arbitrator, Newyorkbrad, to comment on this issue that if Js82 was subject to AE action following the AE report since he fulfilled the requirement of 2nd point of awareness of discretionary sanctions as listed on the policy page. D4iNa4 (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Your reintroductions
Youve reintroduced names on a very long list of notables that we are trying to keep in a form that is not too large. They are the people with the fewest notable appearances in highest level competitions/games and the like. I see there were errors with deletions by another editor here and here - I'm not sure how Green and Fiedler and Tippett were deleted, etc, perhaps someone else did that, and that was a mistake, and it is excellent that you restored them, and their articles all substantiate them, and if someone wants the ref in the list also they should simply flag it (most lists as you know don't have that extra ref moved up to the list), and on looking at the deletions closely it is totally weird as many of them have proper refs in the list, and these are obviously not the less-notable people but highly-notable. The others are obvious I think. I've introduced many I am now deleting as the list has gotten longer. Please understand the reason. Plus - you are reintroducing errors that led to ce edits. Why in the world would you go against wp convention with team name? And the conformity of the list with showing "NBA" and "Euroleague"? And conformity of basketball player list format in reflecting Hymans height? And the abbreviation format in the list for other football players in reflecting short version of position? This list has been in place and reworked in this manner for years by a number of editors, and frankly nobody has done what you have done here -- a blind, non-thought out revert, keeping the least notables as the list gets longer, and reintroducing all the errors your reversion of ce's reintroduce. That frankly makes no sense, if you are part of us who want to keep this list manageable and up to date and in conformity. Which I expect you do. --2604:2000:E020:9500:E170:C83E:37FA:40CA (talk) 09:01, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
- My revert also removed a number of names that were added in violation of WP:BLPCAT. Page history shows that it was not before this month that that a number of notable names were being removed. Because of these few issues I made blanket revert, despite there are many good edits that you made to the list concerning the small descriptions of the entries. Reverting won't accomplish, but you can remove the names again that you really believe should not be there and also modify descriptions of the entries. D4iNa4 (talk) 08:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- When I get a chance I will try to fix this. I think you made some great saves where some improper editor removed names that should be there. Without question. But you also without question roughly and without an explanation in the edit summary removed proper ce edits that were improvements. And I believe that for the reasons I said the less notable names should be removed, as they have been for years over time, as we keep the list manageable, because without this this list would of course look like all the relevant categories, which would be too long for our purposes. But I will try to fix this in a way that you and I, I hope, think will be proper - even though to be honest I think the rules are that you both should not make a blanket revert where you are reverting what even you would agree are for example proper ce edits - the rules don't allow that, and they also ask that you leave an edit summary when reverting an editor that gives a good reason for reverting them, which is not the case in for example those ce edits which I think you agree with. Anyway, it is more important, of these three issues, that you caught the deletes of Green and other major athletes, and without you that would not have been noticed, and I thank you for that. That was great. 2604:2000:E020:9500:8B:3E2:543A:A11E (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have restored the edits that you had made. You can remove the names you don't think should be there, but remove them only when you have obvious reasons on which everyone would agree with you. D4iNa4 (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- When I get a chance I will try to fix this. I think you made some great saves where some improper editor removed names that should be there. Without question. But you also without question roughly and without an explanation in the edit summary removed proper ce edits that were improvements. And I believe that for the reasons I said the less notable names should be removed, as they have been for years over time, as we keep the list manageable, because without this this list would of course look like all the relevant categories, which would be too long for our purposes. But I will try to fix this in a way that you and I, I hope, think will be proper - even though to be honest I think the rules are that you both should not make a blanket revert where you are reverting what even you would agree are for example proper ce edits - the rules don't allow that, and they also ask that you leave an edit summary when reverting an editor that gives a good reason for reverting them, which is not the case in for example those ce edits which I think you agree with. Anyway, it is more important, of these three issues, that you caught the deletes of Green and other major athletes, and without you that would not have been noticed, and I thank you for that. That was great. 2604:2000:E020:9500:8B:3E2:543A:A11E (talk) 04:35, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
AE notification
There is a discussion about your behaviour at WP:AE. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 07:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)