| Revision as of 13:04, 16 May 2018 view sourceAmakuru (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,088 editsm formatting← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:08, 16 May 2018 view source TonyBallioni (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Rollbackers49,329 edits →User:Netoholic: Not done (using responseHelper)Next edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ::*I was about to assign, but I saw a few edit warring warnings around naming conventions and redirect targets, one issued recently by {{u|Amakuru}}. Amakuru, I'll defer to you here. ] (]) 11:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | ::*I was about to assign, but I saw a few edit warring warnings around naming conventions and redirect targets, one issued recently by {{u|Amakuru}}. Amakuru, I'll defer to you here. ] (]) 11:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::*:{{ping|TonyBallioni}} yes, {{u|Netoholic}} yesterday did raise a few question marks in my head about their willingness to accept community consensus and engage collaboratively. They changed the target of a long-standing redirect, which is fine as a bold change, but then reinstated the change after I have reverted it. When challenged on the issue, they refused to undo their change and also refused to acknowledge the community consensus on that issue as laid out in ], which would raise worries about PM criterion #3, concerning moving in accordance with guidelines. I also noted on the page of a relatively new user. The underlying point was correct, that the user had somewhat misrepresented the situation for the ], but I don't think that was done in bad faith, and the tone used was not fitting for an experienced user talking to a newbie. And Netoholic reverted several other moves by the same user, which were fully in accordance with ] and ], so did not need reverting. I would therefore personally not grant the right at this time, but would invite Netoholic to apply again in a few months and demonstrate a willingness in that time to engage with community consensus and not use the move function to pursue their own agenda. — ] (]) 13:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | ::*:{{ping|TonyBallioni}} yes, {{u|Netoholic}} yesterday did raise a few question marks in my head about their willingness to accept community consensus and engage collaboratively. They changed the target of a long-standing redirect, which is fine as a bold change, but then reinstated the change after I have reverted it. When challenged on the issue, they refused to undo their change and also refused to acknowledge the community consensus on that issue as laid out in ], which would raise worries about PM criterion #3, concerning moving in accordance with guidelines. I also noted on the page of a relatively new user. The underlying point was correct, that the user had somewhat misrepresented the situation for the ], but I don't think that was done in bad faith, and the tone used was not fitting for an experienced user talking to a newbie. And Netoholic reverted several other moves by the same user, which were fully in accordance with ] and ], so did not need reverting. I would therefore personally not grant the right at this time, but would invite Netoholic to apply again in a few months and demonstrate a willingness in that time to engage with community consensus and not use the move function to pursue their own agenda. — ] (]) 13:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::{{not done}} per Amakuru, who's judgement I trust and agree with per the guidelines. ] (]) 13:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| ====]==== | ====]==== | ||
Revision as of 13:08, 16 May 2018
| Requests for permissions | |
|---|---|
| Common | |
| Uncommon | |
| Logs | |
| Special | |
Page mover
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions. (add request · view requests) Shortcuts See Misplaced Pages:Page mover for the granting guidelines. Applicants should show some evidence that they generally meet the guidelines outlined there, and have a demonstrated need for the right.User:Netoholic
- Netoholic (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · CSD log · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
- I'm active in WP:RM and a reviewer in the WP:AFC wikiproject. In both cases, resolving them sometimes involves moving a draft/article in place of an existing redirect, and with PM permission, I could assist in a greater capacity closing requests or helping do related post-close cleanup. -- Netoholic @ 03:52, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- I was about to assign, but I saw a few edit warring warnings around naming conventions and redirect targets, one issued recently by Amakuru. Amakuru, I'll defer to you here. TonyBallioni (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- @TonyBallioni: yes, my interaction with Netoholic yesterday did raise a few question marks in my head about their willingness to accept community consensus and engage collaboratively. They changed the target of a long-standing redirect, which is fine as a bold change, but then reinstated the change after I have reverted it. When challenged on the issue, they refused to undo their change and also refused to acknowledge the community consensus on that issue as laid out in WP:SONGDAB, which would raise worries about PM criterion #3, concerning moving in accordance with guidelines. I also noted an unnecessarily aggressive talk page comment on the page of a relatively new user. The underlying point was correct, that the user had somewhat misrepresented the situation for the WP:RMTR, but I don't think that was done in bad faith, and the tone used was not fitting for an experienced user talking to a newbie. And Netoholic reverted several other moves by the same user, which were fully in accordance with WP:SONGDAB and WP:ALBUMDAB, so did not need reverting. I would therefore personally not grant the right at this time, but would invite Netoholic to apply again in a few months and demonstrate a willingness in that time to engage with community consensus and not use the move function to pursue their own agenda. — Amakuru (talk) 13:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- I was about to assign, but I saw a few edit warring warnings around naming conventions and redirect targets, one issued recently by Amakuru. Amakuru, I'll defer to you here. TonyBallioni (talk) 11:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Not done per Amakuru, who's judgement I trust and agree with per the guidelines. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
User:Hhkohh
- Hhkohh (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs · CSD log · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)
- I want this right to assist in WP:RM/TR or closing WP:RMCD with clear consensus, thanks! Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)