| Revision as of 15:43, 8 June 2018 editJytdog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers187,951 edits →Canvassing: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:56, 10 June 2018 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 edits →CanvassingNext edit → | ||
| Line 394: | Line 394: | ||
| ::::Right and when you saw there was one, and who that person was, you should have thought again. Your judgement there was poor, which is bad for you and bad for the community. As a paid editor who wants to be a good member of the community (and I appreciate that very much), and as you are under somewhat of a spotlight now (which is unfortunate, but there it is), you need to use excellent judgement. Being a white hat paid editor and not causing drama takes exquisite footwork and that is even more true at the moment. | ::::Right and when you saw there was one, and who that person was, you should have thought again. Your judgement there was poor, which is bad for you and bad for the community. As a paid editor who wants to be a good member of the community (and I appreciate that very much), and as you are under somewhat of a spotlight now (which is unfortunate, but there it is), you need to use excellent judgement. Being a white hat paid editor and not causing drama takes exquisite footwork and that is even more true at the moment. | ||
| ::::I have no more to say here, except please be more mindful. ] (]) 15:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC) | ::::I have no more to say here, except please be more mindful. ] (]) 15:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I want to echo Jytdog's message: you are very close to the boundary in this, and in the extent of your advocacy for your position. As far as I can judge it,you are also very close to the limit of the patience of the community; what I can certainly judge is that you have exceeded my own. ''']''' (]) 07:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:56, 10 June 2018
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ale Resnik has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Onel5969 (talk) 13:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)Beepi DRN case.
Hi! I want to apologize for the delays, and let you know i am working on it. See User talk:Steven Zhang#Help needed with Beepi case.
After this DRN case is closed, I am going to start asking on our policy pages to see what kind of changes we can make so that thise sort of thing isn't so difficult and time-consuming for someone in your position. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
To editor Guy Macon: Hi. I appreciate it. I think I made a mistake asking for a RFC instead of posting the template for a requested COI edit. My guess is that editors who frequently look at COI requests are generally better for evaluations like this. Meantime, it looks like an editor User:Jytdog left a note on the dispute board, then made the changes on Beepi related to the financial updates, while the other changes are being evaluated. I have no connection to this user. BTW, I only suggested the other requested changes because the RFC editor asked for more general information about Beepi, in addition to financial updates. Happy to have them evaluated and for any other improvements to the article.
LRN
Hi Ed~
Not at all -- go right ahead.
DRosenbach 00:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:LRN has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: LRN (company) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Nannadeem (talk) 21:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)AN/I notice
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. John Nagle (talk) 20:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Draft moved
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:AlienVault. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor 22:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: How (philosophy) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dov Seidman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages LRN and Economic Times. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ecoscraps has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Ecoscraps has a new comment
May 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Draft: Ecoscraps, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See my comments at the draft and the comments of various reviewers at the Teahouse. It is a good idea to take our advice if you don't want to annoy your client by getting blocked for tendentious editing. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ecoscraps has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ecoscraps has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Naraht (talk) 11:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Your draft article, Draft:AlienVault
Hello, BC1278. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "AlienVault".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. Omni Flames 05:01, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Ribbit Capital has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Ribbit Capital has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: LifeBEAM has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Daniel kenneth (talk) 18:05, 30 May 2016 (UTC)Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:58, 30 May 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.
Your help desk questions
You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:16, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ribbit Capital (company) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
LoudLizard (📞 | contribs | ✉) 17:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Lack (executive) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
RegistryKey 22:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)August 2016
Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Andrew Lack (executive). I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this: |image=], instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do: |image=SomeImage.jpg. There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (/What I been doing) 23:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cocooning, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valentino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:OLX (2) has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: OLX has been accepted
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
» Shadowowl | talk 12:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Thanks
Thank you both for being clear about a possible conflict of interest, and for raising your concern about WP:BLP over on the article about Sheryl Sandberg. I was very happy to see how you approached the issue. --Yamla (talk) 16:02, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, BC1278. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Jim Brett has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Adam Pritzker has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
ProgrammingGeek (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 00:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey
Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.
You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.
Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
- This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
- Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.
Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.
If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.
About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Your edit request: Letgo
Hi BC1278. I have partially completed your edit request on Talk:Letgo. Please take a look at your request for suggestions to improve the lead section. Once the lead of the article has been rewritten, ping me and I would be happy to merge the content into the main article. Thank you! Daylen (talk) 18:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:BC1278/Caryn Marooney2
Hello, BC1278. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Caryn Marooney2".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. 1989 17:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
My etiquette error
Apologies for making abrupt edits in your sandbox for the Laura J. Alber bio. I forgot that I was looking at a sandbox and not a live article. But they were valid edits I think for NPOV, should you decide to publish it. As for further review, I will decline as a personal policy I steer clear of paid work on WP. - Bri (talk) 16:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Bri:They're appreciated. I just left you a message asking if you'd like to do the review on the Talk section of the live stub article. Talk:Laura_J._Alber It requires independent review as I have a conflict of interest. Thanks. BC1278 (talk) 16:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)BC1278
@Bri: I understand -- and as a volunteer, however you choose to spend your time is up to you. But, please understand that because of the difficulty in getting independent reviewers, in the case of some subjects, it is difficult or even impossible to get a review, no matter the merits of the article So I turn away many people who ask for my help - and they just go ahead and edit without any disclosure of their conflict of interest. They also don't get the benefit of having someone like me help them who knows and follows Misplaced Pages policies. I see it constantly. The result is many lower quality article for Misplaced Pages, with abundant undisclosed COI. This is the exact opposite of the intended effect of the COI policy. BC1278 (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)BC1278
Your edit request: Laura J. Alber
Hi BC1278. I have partially completed your edit request on Talk:Laura J. Alber. Please take a look at your request for some suggestions. Once the suggestions have been fixed, ping me and I would be happy to merge the updates into the main article. Thank you! Daylen (talk) 19:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Draft:Marne Levine concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Marne Levine, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Alec Oxenford has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Alec Oxenford has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Primefac (talk) 14:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, BC1278. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Assembled Brands has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
ProgrammingGeek 13:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)Draft:Caryn Marooney
Hi there, Ed! I saw your request on Rosiestep's page for a review of this article. Maybe I can first make some informal comments here. Without going into too much detail, the following might help you along.
At the moment, the article deals above all with Marooney's career developments since 2005 and especially since 2011. There is very little on her early life. It would help to have more information about her birth, parents, childhood, education and marriage, if possible with dates. I see from here that she was 32 in 2010 so she must have been born around 1967/68. You'll find a snippet from the Brearley Bulletin here. You can probably also find out what she studied at Cornell and when she was there.
The account of her career is rather stereotyped: basically a set of dates and assignments. Try to fill it out with comment from others. I see, for example, there are a number of interviews, etc., where Maronney expands on her views. You could look through these for a more personalized account of her career., , , etc. There's also more herel.
Finally, the article reads a bit like a cv and is over-promotional. Try to present it in a more neutral, biograpical style. But it's coming on quite well so keep at it. She deserves an article.--Ipigott (talk) 15:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Fifth Wall Ventures
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Lake Ontario Wind (talk) 12:45, 2 January 2018 (UTC)references etc.
There are scripts to help with many tasks, including checking references, see User:Lingzhi/reviewsourcecheck. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 07:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Special:PrefixIndex/User:BC1278BC1278 (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2018 (UTC)BC1278 User:BC1278/sandbox/Fifth Wall
Alivecor
Hi BC1278,
I wonder if a better way to write about the topic would be instead to write about the Kardiaband, rather than writing about Alivecor. Some of the references seem to take that approach.
Would you be amenable to that approach?
BakerStMD 17:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi user: Bakerstmd. Thanks for writing with your idea. I did think about a separate story for Kardiaband as a possibility at some point. Aside from the research to date, there is significant ongoing clinical research with Mayo, Cleveland Clinic and Columbia that will likely result in more peer reviewed academic articles and additional FDA and EU approvals for the device.
But in this case, Alivecor is not a single product company. Kardia Mobile is still an important product and widely used because it does not require an Apple Watch, just a smart phone. This has been the main product of the company for many years and also has a bunch of clinical research. Kardia Pro, for physicians to monitor multiple patients with devices, works with both Kardia Mobile and KardiaBand.
And while I don't mention this in the article, publications have mentioned that the company may negotiate to license its FDA approved diagnostic AI software to other device makers. I didn't include it yet because of WP:CRYSTAL This is separate from the ECG medical device.
So, this is a multiproduct company and we'd lose too much current and future information if we only wrote about KardiaBand.
There's also the business angle. They hired a well known CEO from Google and a prominent engineering team. And they have financing from well known companies and the Mayo Clinic. All this would be lost without an Alivecor article. The company qualifies as notable separate from KardiaBand press. It had many years of press and peer reviewed academic articles before KardiaBand.
I think that the best short term solution is to place a forward to Alivecor in case anyone searches KardiaBand. And if the research findings on KardiaBand become too involved for the Alivecor article, then someone can consider a separate article.
We might also put the Products section above the History if there is a concern that a patient doing research might not get to the most relevant information quickly enough.
There is already a review going on with another editor, on the Talk page, so I'd suggest consolidating this discussion there. I will copy and paste it. ----BC1278
Hi BC1278, I've reviewed the page, thanks for making the changes - it is now live at Alivecor Adh (talk) 09:00, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi BC1278, sorry about oops. Moved now Adh (talk) 21:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
new article on VC personality
Hi there!
Seems fine to me. But you have to be very careful with details since your article is about a living person.
Lamro (talk) 15:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Canvassing
Hey BC1278. User:Domdeparis asked me about this.
Looking at your contribs, that is the only person you notified, and one who is likely to be sympathetic, so this is a violation of WP:CANVASS. I've followed up with a note there; please don't do that anymore. Jytdog (talk) 14:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog: It's not canvassing, although I understand why you think it looks as such at first glance. I first checked article history and that user is the only other editor to have made any edits to the article, other than bots, and someone removing a stub notice. If there had been any other contributors, I would have notified them, too.BC1278 (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
- So, that was your gut response. I have been asking you to re-think your gut response. Your original request to that particular inexperienced editor was unwise and you know better now; rallying them to the AfD and review of the draft was very unwise. I do hear the argument that this person was the only other major contributor... but that should never have been the case. Jytdog (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog:I prepared the note first, to notify everyone, as I said. I intended to do a string of @ for each contributor. If there had been 10, it would have gone to 10. Then I saw there was only one editor, so I modified the note to refer to just them. I should not, however, have made the edit request in the same note. DGG had been willing to just let me make changes in Draft, since this was a significant update under a short time deadline, but this same editor said they objected. It's more sloppy to do the evaluation of the AfD based on only Talk updates, but since the editor deems these additions as controversial, it will have to wait for discussion at the Talk page.BC1278 (talk) 15:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
- Right and when you saw there was one, and who that person was, you should have thought again. Your judgement there was poor, which is bad for you and bad for the community. As a paid editor who wants to be a good member of the community (and I appreciate that very much), and as you are under somewhat of a spotlight now (which is unfortunate, but there it is), you need to use excellent judgement. Being a white hat paid editor and not causing drama takes exquisite footwork and that is even more true at the moment.
- I have no more to say here, except please be more mindful. Jytdog (talk) 15:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Jytdog:I prepared the note first, to notify everyone, as I said. I intended to do a string of @ for each contributor. If there had been 10, it would have gone to 10. Then I saw there was only one editor, so I modified the note to refer to just them. I should not, however, have made the edit request in the same note. DGG had been willing to just let me make changes in Draft, since this was a significant update under a short time deadline, but this same editor said they objected. It's more sloppy to do the evaluation of the AfD based on only Talk updates, but since the editor deems these additions as controversial, it will have to wait for discussion at the Talk page.BC1278 (talk) 15:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)BC1278
- So, that was your gut response. I have been asking you to re-think your gut response. Your original request to that particular inexperienced editor was unwise and you know better now; rallying them to the AfD and review of the draft was very unwise. I do hear the argument that this person was the only other major contributor... but that should never have been the case. Jytdog (talk) 14:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- I want to echo Jytdog's message: you are very close to the boundary in this, and in the extent of your advocacy for your position. As far as I can judge it,you are also very close to the limit of the patience of the community; what I can certainly judge is that you have exceeded my own. DGG ( talk ) 07:56, 10 June 2018 (UTC)