Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Faizanali.007: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:25, 10 July 2018 editLorstaking (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,860 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit Revision as of 06:25, 10 July 2018 edit undoNauriya (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,746 edits Comments by other usersTag: 2017 wikitext editorNext edit →
Line 64: Line 64:
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small> <small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See ].''</small>


All I can say in my defence. I have been accessed for that accounts, and it was when I barely knew Misplaced Pages in 2013. After that I did get blocked for uploading images and uaing proxy, because I was in China, where everything is blocked and was given Proxy exempt to use this platform. Since then when I get to know and understood the ways of Misplaced Pages, I have not been involved in any conflicts and edit warning. I have created over thousand articles with this account and never had any problem. My last account which I created is same as this one because I requested a name change. And since then I have had not access or nor uses any other account. You can check my history, look into it and you will know. There is nothing to hide or any thing wrong so I will contest this till end for what I have worked so hard to built over five years. I had a rough start but since then I have done nothing but to contribute to this platform with my fare share of efforts, unlike others.

The only reason I see this SPI is because the filer is involved in India-Pakistan related issues, and user itself is suspected of SPI which I filed. So I request look into my accounts and then decide for yourself. ] ] 10 July 2018, 09:18 (UTC)


====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====

Revision as of 06:25, 10 July 2018

Faizanali.007

Faizanali.007 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Faizanali.007/Archive.


10 July 2018

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets


Similar to Faizanali.007, Nauriya who was previously known as "Fushan007", seems to be a sock of Faizanali.007, given the similarity in their names there are many other similarities. Nauriya is a suspicious account that often engages in copyright violations and these days he has been probably proxying for a topic banned editor for feuding with those with whom he never interacted before.

Reading the contribution of Nauriya, I find him to be a sock of Faizanali.007 along with these other editors.

  1. Faizanali.007 was blocked on 30 May 2013.
  2. Salarsikandar.81 was created on 19 July 2013 and blocked on 9 October 2013.
  3. Tabraiz.18 was created on 10 October 2013 and blocked on 14 October 2013
  4. Nauriya aka Fushan007 was created on 6 December 2013.
  • First edits of these accounts including Nauriya were creation of user page and talk page, something that UPE socks always do. Their first edit to userpage and talk page provides same meaning:
Nauriya's first two edits.
Tabraiz.18's first two edits were also creation of userpage and creation of talk page.
Same with Salarsikandar.81.
  • "This is my User page" (Nauriya)
"this is my talk page" (Salarsikandar.81)
  • The timeline of these accounts editing same articles and making same edits is significantly listed by this link of the history of 1st Hum Awards where Faizanali.007 edited much but had his most edits suppressed due to copyvio, and after the block on this editor every other suspected socks including Nauriya joined this article, depending on the timeline and life span.
  • Using same upload summary:
"This the poster of Pakistani drama serial Numm, the copyright is completely observed and hold by Geo TV" (Salarsikandar.81)
"This the poster of Pakistani drama serial Shehr-e-Zaat, the copyright is completely observed and hold by Hum TV" (Nauriya)
  • Using same image description:
"This is a Television release poster of Hum TV drama serial Mohabbat Subha Ka Sitara Hai 2014, all copyrights are holded by Hum TV and Moomina Duraid Production(Moomal Productions). - Nauriya
"This is a Television release poster of Geo TV drama serial Numm 2013, all copyrights are holded by geo tv and Agha Talish Production. - Salarsikander
There is no word like "holded" neither 't' of 'television' is capitalized.
  • I find this shouting by creating the talk page and writing some words in all caps to be rare:
  • Salarsikandar.81 created Sania Saeed with an infobox and Nauriya updated that infobox.
  • Sometimes gives large edit summary by writing words in caps.
  • Faizanali.007 and Nauriya modified image parameter of Fawad Khan.
  • Faizanali.007 added "Infobox award" for Noman Ijaz while Nauriya added multiple awards.

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

All I can say in my defence. I have been accessed for that accounts, and it was when I barely knew Misplaced Pages in 2013. After that I did get blocked for uploading images and uaing proxy, because I was in China, where everything is blocked and was given Proxy exempt to use this platform. Since then when I get to know and understood the ways of Misplaced Pages, I have not been involved in any conflicts and edit warning. I have created over thousand articles with this account and never had any problem. My last account which I created is same as this one because I requested a name change. And since then I have had not access or nor uses any other account. You can check my history, look into it and you will know. There is nothing to hide or any thing wrong so I will contest this till end for what I have worked so hard to built over five years. I had a rough start but since then I have done nothing but to contribute to this platform with my fare share of efforts, unlike others.

The only reason I see this SPI is because the filer is involved in India-Pakistan related issues, and user itself is suspected of SPI which I filed. So I request look into my accounts and then decide for yourself. Nauriya Let's talk 10 July 2018, 09:18 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments


Categories: