User talk:Cjwright79: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 16:22, 6 November 2006 editConsumed Crustacean (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers9,320 edits template. vprotect -> usertalk-vprotect← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:26, 6 November 2006 edit undoLuna Santin (talk \| contribs)65,325 edits unblock reviewedNext edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:


			{{unblock-auto reviewed\|70.70.200.149\|vandalism and trolling\|decline=Sorry to say, but I see similarities in both subject and style of editing. You appear to be the same person, or a related person, which would in turn appear to make this a valid block. Sorry. -- ] 20:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)}}
	{{unblock-auto\|1=70.70.200.149\|2=vandalism and trolling}}

	I'd like to have someone other than ab], an ] in ], look at this matter, si vous plait. -- ] 16:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)		I'd like to have someone other than ab], an ] in ], look at this matter, si vous plait. -- ] 16:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:26, 6 November 2006

Please leave your comments, questions or concerns below.

Chris 15:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

New Talk

Older Talk

Any talk placed in this section will be deleted, rather than archived.

All conversations are moved here -- Jan-Nov 2006 -- within a few days, usually a few hours, often a few minutes.

Request for unautoblock

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Cjwright79 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.70.200.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

vandalism and trolling

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: Sorry to say, but I see similarities in both subject and style of editing. You appear to be the same person, or a related person, which would in turn appear to make this a valid block. Sorry. -- Luna Santin 20:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I'd like to have someone other than abuser:Consumed Crustacean, an American in Canada, look at this matter, si vous plait. -- Chris 16:12, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Note my reason for the first unautoblock denial. 70...'s editing style match's this user's (ie. "adding vandalism" in one edit summary). I'd also suggest whoever reads this considers a longer block of this user, though he would probably cry foul if I did it myself. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)