Misplaced Pages

Kabwe skull: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:40, 15 September 2008 edit71.239.229.11 (talk) Undid revision 238536239 by Eeekster (talk) do you have a reason ?← Previous edit Latest revision as of 08:15, 8 October 2018 edit undoDbachmann (talk | contribs)227,714 edits ←Changed redirect target from Homo heidelbergensis#Kabwe to Kabwe 1Tag: Redirect target changed 
(46 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
{{Merge|Homo rhodesiensis|date=July 2008}}
{{R printworthy}}
{{Infobox fossil
|img = Rhodesian Man.jpg
|catalog number = Broken Hill 1
|common name = Rhodesian Man or Kabwe cranium
|species = '']'' or '']''
|age =
|place discovered = ], ]
|date discovered = 1921
|discovered by = Tom Zwiglaar
}}

'''Rhodesian Man''', frequently classified as '']'' is a ] fossil that was described from a ] found in an ] and ] mine in Broken Hill ] (now Kabwe, ]) in 1921 by Tom Zwiglaar, a Swiss ]. In addition to the cranium, an upper ] from another individual, a ], a ], and two ] fragments were also found. The skull was dubbed Rhodesian Man at the time of the find, but is now commonly referred to as the '''Broken Hill Skull''' or the '''Kabwe Cranium'''.
]
]
The association between the bones is unclear, but the tibia and femur fossils are usually associated with the skull. Rhodesian Man is dated to be between 125,000 and 300,000 years old. Previously, some reports have given erroneous dates of up to 1.75 and 2.5 million years age for the skull. Cranial capacity of the Broken Hill skull has been measured at 1,100 cm³, which, when coupled with the more recent dating, makes any direct link to older skulls unlikely and negates the 1.75 to 2.5 million year earlier dating. Bada & al (1974) published direct date of 110 ka for this specimen measured by aspartic acid racemisation. The destruction of the paleoanthropological site, mined to deep filed now with water pit, make layered dating completely impossible.


The skull is from an extremely robust individual, and has the comparatively largest brow-ridges of any known hominid remains. It was described as having a broad face similar to '']'' (ie. large nose and thick protruding brow ridges), and has been interpreted as an "African Neanderthal". However, when regarding the skulls extreme robustness, recent research has pointed to several features intermediate between modern '']'' and Neanderthal. Most current experts believe Rhodesian Man to be within the group of '']'' though other designations such as ''Archaic Homo sapiens'' and ''Homo sapiens rhodesiensis'' have also been proposed. According to ], it is probable that Rhodesian Man was the ancestor of '']'' (Herto Man), which would be itself at the origin of '']''. No direct linkage of the species can so far be determined.

==References==
*{{cite journal|author=Woodward, Arthur Smith|year=1921|title=A New Cave Man from Rhodesia, South Africa|journal=Nature|volume=108|pages=371–372|doi=10.1038/108371a0}}
*{{cite journal|author=Singer Robert R. and J. Wymer|year=1968|title=Archaeological Investigation at the Saldanha Skull Site in South Africa|journal=The South African Archaeological Bulletin|volume=23 (3)|pages=63–73|doi=10.2307/3888485}}
*

==See also==
* ] ''(with link directory)''
* ] ''(with images)''

]
]
]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 08:15, 8 October 2018

Redirect to: