Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sennen goroshi: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:56, 13 October 2018 editHLHJ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,770 edits Message on Heat-not-burn tobacco product: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:39, 15 October 2018 edit undoDennis Bratland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users61,245 edits Bye: new sectionNext edit →
Line 57: Line 57:


Hi, Sennen goroshi. I left you a message at ]. Please leave me an answer there, as I won't be watching here. Thanks! ] (]) 04:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC) Hi, Sennen goroshi. I left you a message at ]. Please leave me an answer there, as I won't be watching here. Thanks! ] (]) 04:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

== Bye ==

You stay off my talk page permanently. Bye. --] (]) 22:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:39, 15 October 2018

I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo


Atom

The Atom is not street legal in many countries -->Typ932 14:19, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Neither is the Skyline R34 GT-R, Porsche 959 or Mclaren F1. Don't they count either?--Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Are you sure? which countries? also they dont beat Ferrari in NA engines and has nothing to do with this case -->Typ932 17:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
In the States - and while they are irrelevant to the highest NA engine issue, it is relevant that they are considered production cars, despite not being road legal in certain countries. --Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 06:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Dont mix production and street legal cars, those are still "cars" not some kit track boxes on wheels, Ill bet some countries could have Formula1 car as street legal, we need to see larger picture, and those are most probably street legal in many more countries than Atom or Caparo, USA is also large exemption for European cars, they have such strick laws for import cars -->Typ932 07:05, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
The Atom is mosty likely street legal car as many country as McLaren isnt -->Typ932 07:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Car collection.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:59, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Jules Bianchi

You just literally revert-warred unsourced, unsigned anon speculation about the condition of a living person into an article talk page. I'm stunned speechless. You must know how inappropriate this is — Misplaced Pages talk pages are not forums for discussion or speculation about anything, much less whether someone's alive or dead. Please don't do it again. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 08:59, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

wikipedia policy allows for speculation on talk pages. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:27, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

You are reverting to a vandalised version saying that Bianchi has died. Stop immediately or I will report you to an admin. Bretonbanquet (talk) 09:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
It is speculation, no one knows if he is dead on not. Would you like a link to the meaning of the word speculation? Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
What is the matter with you? You want to keep someone's idiotic vandal edit saying Bianchi has died, with no basis in fact whatsoever? Keep it up, I will report you. Bretonbanquet (talk) 09:31, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Did you see the crash? Did you see what he hit? Unfortunately, there is a reasonable chance that he did actually die. It is valid speculation, not vandalism. Don't spam my talk page again. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:33, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I saw the accident, or as much as US television showed. I also used to work in professional motor racing, and I've had to write press releases for serious crashes and driver injuries. For fuck's sake, have some respect for Jules, his team and the F1 community; if you want to run around speculating about someone who may well be fighting for their life right now, Reddit and 4chan are thataway. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Don't ever swear on my page again, or you will have all your comments removed. I didn't speculate anything, I merely supported another wikipedian's right to do so. Take a look at who made which edit, before you accuse me of anything. If the speculation had been made on the article page, I would have removed it. Talk pages are the correct place for speculation. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 09:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Speaking as someone who's seen the various post-crash photos posted to Twitter, Facebook, and reliable media sources, I'm going to say that there's a difference between my having speculated (on Talk:2014 Japanese Grand Prix) that the "surgery to reduce severe bruising to the head" that his father reported is actually surgery to reduce intracranial pressure by draining a subdural hematoma under a closed head fracture and possibly swelling due to brain bruising (and acknowledging that it would be a MASSIVE WP:SYNTH violation to actually put this in articlespace), and an IP cruising by to insert an unsourced and unexplained "he just died" on the talkpage after another IP had just had a clumsy attempt at tagging the article "DECEASED" reverted. One is speculation; the other is trolling. rdfox 76 (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
If you feel that strongly about it, you are on the wrong talk page. I personally can't read minds and am unable to comment regarding the motivation behind the edits made by the anon IP editor. But then again, I tend to have good faith in all editors, so I will assume he was not trolling and actually thought the guy had died. Sennen Goroshi ! (talk) 16:08, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Car collection.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Car collection.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly 12:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Electronic cigarette topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33

Heat-not-burn tobacco product --RexxS (talk) 17:40, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Message on Heat-not-burn tobacco product

Hi, Sennen goroshi. I left you a message at Talk:IQOS#Large-scale revert of health information. Please leave me an answer there, as I won't be watching here. Thanks! HLHJ (talk) 04:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Bye

You stay off my talk page permanently. Bye. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:39, 15 October 2018 (UTC)