| Revision as of 09:40, 28 September 2006 editUncle G (talk | contribs)Administrators52,482 edits Adjusted PNC elaboration to bring it into line with improved WP:CORP and WP:SCHOOL wording.← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:04, 9 November 2006 edit undoRrfayette (talk | contribs)1,025 edits Minor revision to improve page readability so users can grasp the main concepts with increasing efficiency; also attempted to make it more concise by omitting unnecessary statements/wordsNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{Misplaced Pages subcat guideline|notability criteria|Websites|]}} | {{Misplaced Pages subcat guideline|notability criteria|Websites|]}} | ||
| {{IncGuide}} | {{IncGuide}} | ||
| ⚫ | This page gives some rough guidelines |
||
| ==Introduction== | |||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | This page gives some rough guidelines used by Misplaced Pages editors to decide if any form of web-specific content, being either the content of a website or the specific website itself, should have an article on Misplaced Pages. Any content which is distributed solely on the internet is considered web content, which includes, but is not limited to, ]s, ], ]s, ]s, ]s and other ], ] and ].<ref>Content which has been packaged into material form, such as onto ], ] or ] form, but which is still primarily only available for sale via the internet, still falls under these guidelines. If such packaging of the product is widely available for sale in major ] ]s, then it should be considered a product, for which see ].</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | ] is an official policy of long standing. Consequently, many Wikipedians are wholly averse to the use of Misplaced Pages for ]. Advertising is either ] to adhere to the ] or deleted.<ref>If websites or content that do not meet these guidelines but are linked to a topic which does merit inclusion, they may be ] to that topic rather than be listed for deletion.</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | Many Misplaced Pages editors support that Misplaced Pages is not a ], a site ''that specializes in linking to other web sites and categorizing those links.'' Explicitly and by formal policy, Misplaced Pages is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files. Articles which merely include an external link and a brief description of its contents will also be either cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view or deleted.{{fact}} | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | For articles listed for deletion, a listing can be found at ], where editors apply the criteria outlined below. | ||
| ⚫ | == |
||
| ⚫ | Web-specific content<ref>Discussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, ] is a redirect to ]. |
||
| ⚫ | ==What are the criteria for web content?== | ||
| ⚫ | # The content |
||
| ⚫ | Web-specific content<ref>Discussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, ] is a redirect to ]. Conversely, ] is a standalone page.</ref> is notable if it meets ''any one'' of the following criteria: | ||
| ⚫ | # The content has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the site. | ||
| #* This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations.<ref>Examples: | #* This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations.<ref>Examples: | ||
| * The webcomic '']'' has been reviewed by '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''. | * The webcomic '']'' has been reviewed by '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''. | ||
| * The blog ] has been covered by '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''.</ref> ''except'' for the following: | * The blog ] has been covered by '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''.</ref> ''except'' for the following: | ||
| #** Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site.<ref>Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be ''someone else'' writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See ] for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.</ref> | #** Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site.<ref>Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be ''someone else'' writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See ] for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people ''independent'' of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.</ref> | ||
| #** Trivial coverage, such as |
#** Trivial coverage, such as news articles that simply report the internet address, the times at which such content is updated or made available, a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of internet addresses and site or content descriptions in internet directories or ]. | ||
| # The website or content has won a well known and independent award, either from a publication or organisation.<ref>Examples of such awards: ]s, ] or ]. See ] for more. Being nominated for an award in multiple years is also considered an indicator of notability.</ref> | # The website or content has won a well known and independent award, either from a publication or organisation.<ref>Examples of such awards: ]s, ] or ]. See ] for more. Being nominated for an award in multiple years is also considered an indicator of notability.</ref> | ||
| # The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.<ref>Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, ] had a ] distributed by '']''. Such distributions should be nontrivial. Although ] and ] are exceedingly well known, hosting content on them is trivial.</ref> | # The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.<ref>Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, ] had a ] distributed by '']''. Such distributions should be nontrivial. Although ] and ] are exceedingly well known, hosting content on them is trivial.</ref> | ||
| The article itself '''must''' provide |
The article itself '''must''' provide ] that its subject meets one of these criteria via inlined links or a ''Reference'', ''Notes'', or ''External link'' section. Even if an ''entire'' website meets the notability criteria, its ''components''--forums, articles, sections--may not be considered notable or deserving of their own separate article. | ||
| == See also == | == See also == | ||
| * ] | * ] | ||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| == Notes == | == Notes == | ||
Revision as of 06:04, 9 November 2006
- WP:WEB redirects here. This page is not Misplaced Pages:Build the web.
 | This page documents an English Misplaced Pages notability criteria. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. | Shortcut
|
| Notability |
|---|
| General notability guideline |
| Subject-specific guidelines |
| See also |
Introduction
This page gives some rough guidelines used by Misplaced Pages editors to decide if any form of web-specific content, being either the content of a website or the specific website itself, should have an article on Misplaced Pages. Any content which is distributed solely on the internet is considered web content, which includes, but is not limited to, webcomics, podcasts, blogs, Internet forums, online magazines and other media, web portals and web hosts.
Misplaced Pages articles are not advertisements is an official policy of long standing. Consequently, many Wikipedians are wholly averse to the use of Misplaced Pages for advertising. Advertising is either cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view or deleted.
Many Misplaced Pages editors support that Misplaced Pages is not a web directory, a site that specializes in linking to other web sites and categorizing those links. Explicitly and by formal policy, Misplaced Pages is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files. Articles which merely include an external link and a brief description of its contents will also be either cleaned up to adhere to the neutral point of view or deleted.
For articles listed for deletion, a listing can be found at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, where editors apply the criteria outlined below.
What are the criteria for web content?
Web-specific content is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:
- The content has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the site.
- This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. except for the following:
- Media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site.
- Trivial coverage, such as news articles that simply report the internet address, the times at which such content is updated or made available, a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of internet addresses and site or content descriptions in internet directories or online stores.
- This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. except for the following:
- The website or content has won a well known and independent award, either from a publication or organisation.
- The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster.
The article itself must provide verfication that its subject meets one of these criteria via inlined links or a Reference, Notes, or External link section. Even if an entire website meets the notability criteria, its components--forums, articles, sections--may not be considered notable or deserving of their own separate article.
See also
Notes
- Content which has been packaged into material form, such as onto CD, DVD or book form, but which is still primarily only available for sale via the internet, still falls under these guidelines. If such packaging of the product is widely available for sale in major brick and mortar retailers, then it should be considered a product, for which see Misplaced Pages:Notability (companies and corporations).
- If websites or content that do not meet these guidelines but are linked to a topic which does merit inclusion, they may be redirected to that topic rather than be listed for deletion.
- Discussions of websites should be incorporated (with a redirect if necessary) into an article about the parent organization, unless the domain-name of the website is the most common way of referring to the organization. For example, yahoo.com is a redirect to Yahoo!. Conversely, Drugstore.com is a standalone page.
- Examples:
- The webcomic When I Am King has been reviewed by The Guardian, Playboy, The Comics Journal, and Wired.
- The blog Daily Kos has been covered by Los Angeles Times, Time, The Washington Post, U.S. News & World Report, and The New York Times.
- Self-promotion and product placement are not the routes to having an encyclopaedia article. The published works must be someone else writing about the company, corporation, product, or service. (See Misplaced Pages:Autobiography for the verifiability and neutrality problems that affect material where the subject of the article itself is the source of the material.) The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, or vendor) have actually considered the content or site notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it.
- Examples of such awards: Eisner Awards, Bloggies or Webby Awards. See Category:Awards for more. Being nominated for an award in multiple years is also considered an indicator of notability.
- Content that is distributed by independent online sites will almost certainly satisfy the first criterion. However, this criterion ensures that our coverage of such content will be complete regardless. For example, Ricky Gervais had a podcast distributed by The Guardian. Such distributions should be nontrivial. Although GeoCities and Newgrounds are exceedingly well known, hosting content on them is trivial.