| Revision as of 21:30, 2 November 2006 editTalkAbout (talk | contribs)2,020 edits →[]: NPA← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:34, 11 November 2006 edit undo195.82.106.244 (talk) Personal attackNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| |}Bksimonb, | |}Bksimonb, | ||
| First, Sir I feel personally attacked by this: “Do not rant and rave on the discussion page of an article. That is for discussing the article only." I have been civil to you and your members of the Brahma Kumaris organisation. What I see here is that you are trying to work the system to hide your true practices, to suit your PR needs under a shield of "verifiable" sources approved by your members, while leaving others out that are quite legitimate. The truth cannot be forever shielded in secrecy. ] 21:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | First, Sir I feel personally attacked by this: “Do not rant and rave on the discussion page of an article. That is for discussing the article only." I have been civil to you and your members of the Brahma Kumaris organisation. What I see here is that you are trying to work the system to hide your true practices, to suit your PR needs under a shield of "verifiable" sources approved by your members, while leaving others out that are quite legitimate. The truth cannot be forever shielded in secrecy. ] 21:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Personal attack == | |||
| Simon, | |||
| you wrote stating that; | |||
| "''Sadly, this underlines how little due care and attention you are giving any given references that oppose your organization's current PR and, perhaps, how unaware or misled you have been of your own organization's history.''" | |||
| '''In case I have it entirely wrong, can you please verify when and whether the BKWSU told you and tells newcomers about, e.g.;''' | |||
| *the 40 years Confluence Age and failed 1976 Destruction scenario? | |||
| *the re-editing of the Sakar Murlis? | |||
| *the role that Kirpalani's parnet Sevak Ram played? | |||
| *the role of the Advance Party? | |||
| Indeed, when does the BKWSU actually tell people about; | |||
| *the importance of mediumship and channelling within the organization's spiritual practise (as listed on the old letterhead)? | |||
| If you can read what I wrote and not see the concern and public interest that individual's are being willfully mislead ... what can I say? | |||
| What divine virtue is this you are practizing here? ] 20:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:34, 11 November 2006
BKWSU information technology team
Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University/Archive02
Copyright issue
Simon,
we are still waiting for clarification on the position of copyright on God Shiva's images.
Can you tell us when to expect this? There would seem no good reason for delay.
Thanks Brahmakumaris.info 16:45, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
NPA to TalkAbout
NPA to Bksimonb
| Please see Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. |
Bksimonb,
First, Sir I feel personally attacked by this: “Do not rant and rave on the discussion page of an article. That is for discussing the article only." I have been civil to you and your members of the Brahma Kumaris organisation. What I see here is that you are trying to work the system to hide your true practices, to suit your PR needs under a shield of "verifiable" sources approved by your members, while leaving others out that are quite legitimate. The truth cannot be forever shielded in secrecy. TalkAbout 21:30, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Personal attack
Simon,
you wrote stating that;
"Sadly, this underlines how little due care and attention you are giving any given references that oppose your organization's current PR and, perhaps, how unaware or misled you have been of your own organization's history."
In case I have it entirely wrong, can you please verify when and whether the BKWSU told you and tells newcomers about, e.g.;
- the 40 years Confluence Age and failed 1976 Destruction scenario?
- the re-editing of the Sakar Murlis?
- the role that Kirpalani's parnet Sevak Ram played?
- the role of the Advance Party?
Indeed, when does the BKWSU actually tell people about;
- the importance of mediumship and channelling within the organization's spiritual practise (as listed on the old letterhead)?
If you can read what I wrote and not see the concern and public interest that individual's are being willfully mislead ... what can I say?
What divine virtue is this you are practizing here? 195.82.106.244 20:34, 11 November 2006 (UTC)