Revision as of 14:54, 15 November 2006 editMiltopia (talk | contribs)2,432 edits →re:Hi: - that's ok← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:49, 15 November 2006 edit undoLuna Santin (talk | contribs)65,325 edits →Unblocked, at least for now: alsoNext edit → | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
''Full unblock summary was truncated:'' ] -- This needs more discussion. User does not appear to be a blatant troll or vandal, and ] confirms the "stalker" account that showed up later was on a different ISP -- with all respect, I'm not convinced they're the same person. Please direct further drama to AN(/I) before reblocking; at the very least, I think this one needs some discussion. ] 09:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ''Full unblock summary was truncated:'' ] -- This needs more discussion. User does not appear to be a blatant troll or vandal, and ] confirms the "stalker" account that showed up later was on a different ISP -- with all respect, I'm not convinced they're the same person. Please direct further drama to AN(/I) before reblocking; at the very least, I think this one needs some discussion. ] 09:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Thanks, but "more discussion on ANI" is what got me banned in the first place, so I don't think that's a good idea. It's obvious I don't need blocking, let's all just drop it. Thanks again for the unblocks, both of you. ] | :Thanks, but "more discussion on ANI" is what got me banned in the first place, so I don't think that's a good idea. It's obvious I don't need blocking, let's all just drop it. Thanks again for the unblocks, both of you. ] | ||
::Alrighty. At this point, it seems you'll remain unblocked. As you might have already expected, it seems remaining unblocked will rely on staying as far away from MONGO as possible (especially anything that even might be interpreted as harassment or stalking, by happenstance or otherwise). Hopefully that's acceptable to you; after tonight's little drama, I have a hunch you were planning on self-imposing such a condition in any case. Feel free to let me know if you have any further concerns or questions in this regard. ] 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Explanation of an edit == | == Explanation of an edit == |
Revision as of 15:49, 15 November 2006
Welcome!
Hello, Miltopia, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 16:39, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Ah, the worm turns! I wonder how long it will last. As far as I'm concerned, the main thing is to have fun. Best wishes to you. --Jacknstock 01:10, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- I love how TROLL!!!! is such a powerword around here, it makes me giggle. MONGO, all you have to do is like, not stalk me, and you won't be bothered by me. Never once have I sought interaction with you, you just found me because you have some kid's userpage watchlisted and got pissed when I tried to give him a laugh. Just go away and save yourself a lot of grief. Miltopia 20:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not mad at him for reverting you, he thought you were one of the vandals, probably. It's just that he said you're "obvios a sock account", you're TROLLING, and you'll be banned if TROLL anymore that is annoying. Don't feel threatened by him, just go have fun doing whatever it is you do. --AlexJohnc3 23:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
- I love how TROLL!!!! is such a powerword around here, it makes me giggle. MONGO, all you have to do is like, not stalk me, and you won't be bothered by me. Never once have I sought interaction with you, you just found me because you have some kid's userpage watchlisted and got pissed when I tried to give him a laugh. Just go away and save yourself a lot of grief. Miltopia 20:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Hellol
HAI-K37 07:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thx for the cock! Miltopia 08:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- No problem, I know you like it! It looks good!-K37 08:55, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
=' 0
Don't leave! --AlexJohnc3 14:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- MILTOPIA NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO-K37 21:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- I don't even know you but don't leave, you're cool 8)
- It's usually not well-looked upon to be an INTERNET DETECTIVE like that, you shouldn't let it bother you Voretus 21:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Furries
Don't let them get you down. They made some edits to my user page, and I intend to leave them there as a mark of honour. If you abandon Wiki, it means that they've won. Lankiveil 06:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC).
(ps: yes, "furcruft" is a bit gross =) )
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Konstable
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Konstable. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Konstable/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Konstable/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Srikeit 05:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Stop, or I will not hesitate to block you for disruption
I'm not kidding.--MONGO 07:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, did you not read your talk page? Miltopia 07:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not here to play games with you, an ED troll. Allow me to edit in peace, or I will ensure I can do so.--MONGO 07:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, taking a tag off of an article is not hurting you, nor is de-redding a link. Could you just chill out? You're inventing hostilities where there are none. Trust me, it is not my goal to facilitate interaction with you. Miltopia 07:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, sure...you show up on Dysgenics out of the blue, then twice remove , a redlined link that I wanted to stay in an article I just created as I plan on writing an article that will fill that link...in fact, I was planning on doing so until you started this nonsense...now that I don't have to deal with your stalking, I can resume doing something useful.--MONGO 07:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Dude, taking a tag off of an article is not hurting you, nor is de-redding a link. Could you just chill out? You're inventing hostilities where there are none. Trust me, it is not my goal to facilitate interaction with you. Miltopia 07:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not here to play games with you, an ED troll. Allow me to edit in peace, or I will ensure I can do so.--MONGO 07:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Unblock
{{unblock|banned for "trolling", did no such thing}} Ugh, I got blocked for removing a tag of an article, then de-redlinking another, then asking for help in dissolving a misunderstanding. I've been doing pretty well editing here lately, even reverting vandalism. To be blocked indefinitely for such a silly thing hardly seems beneficial, especially considering I was seeking help to defuse conflict. Can someone unblock me? Miltopia 07:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I just want to point out that pretty much all of my edits have been to articles or talk pages of people that I know off-site. So I'm definitely not trolling. Give me a break... Miltopia 07:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
You're connection with ED trolls and the coincidence of following MONGO around to articles you have not edited is not believable. --Tbeatty 07:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC) I've edited two article that he's edited.
- 1. An article that I ws told about off-site. I didn't even know MONGO had edited it. WTF.
- 2. An article that yes, I found in his contribs. Because he rollbacked me elsewhere and I was seeing if he was rollbacking me everywhere, and the words "new article" caught my eye, so I decided to read it. Sheesh, I even said it was nice. All I did was remove a redlink.
- I don't have eleventy zillion edits, but I have enough unrelated to MONGO that to say I've set up this acocunt to troll MONGO is ridiculous. I even archived his previous comments because I DIDN'T want interaction with him. He's creating a problem that doesn't really exist here. It's all just a misunderstanding; I have no interest in MONGO. Miltopia 07:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Not believable Tbeatty 07:34, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Exactly, see my comments in section above this one.--MONGO 07:35, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that "apeshit" comment was rude and I removed it later (see my own archive). BUt my intention there was to talk to Alex, not MONGO. Miltopia 07:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've re-blocked. Since immediately after being blocked this user created User:Gentgeen Militopia wheel war vs MONGO, I think any reasonable assumptions of good faith have run out. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 08:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- WHAT?!?!?! OK, I'd better look into this. That was certainly not me. Miltopia 08:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- For one thing, I would've spelled it right. Miltopia 08:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- WHAT?!?!?! OK, I'd better look into this. That was certainly not me. Miltopia 08:12, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
May not be the same editor...but most likely just another ED troll looking to be disruptive.--MONGO 08:46, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Very likely, since I informed them I was unbanned. Looks like I have been trolled. Miltopia 08:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Again
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Miltopia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Since immediately after being blocked this user created User:Gentgeen Militopia wheel war vs MONGO - clearly false, see below
Decline reason:
Lets wait on Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Miltopia to see. Daniel.Bryant 08:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Um, I couldn't have made that username while blocked. For one thing, I wouldn't have know who did the unblocking. Miltopia 08:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Last Time (hopefully)
{{unblock|Checkuser turned up unrelated, surprise surprise}}
So it turns out I'm not the world's biggest idiot and the account is not mine. Can I be unblocked now? Good grief. Miltopia 09:16, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Unblocked, at least for now
Full unblock summary was truncated: WP:AGF -- This needs more discussion. User does not appear to be a blatant troll or vandal, and checkuser confirms the "stalker" account that showed up later was on a different ISP -- with all respect, I'm not convinced they're the same person. Please direct further drama to AN(/I) before reblocking; at the very least, I think this one needs some discussion. Luna Santin 09:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, but "more discussion on ANI" is what got me banned in the first place, so I don't think that's a good idea. It's obvious I don't need blocking, let's all just drop it. Thanks again for the unblocks, both of you. Miltopia
- Alrighty. At this point, it seems you'll remain unblocked. As you might have already expected, it seems remaining unblocked will rely on staying as far away from MONGO as possible (especially anything that even might be interpreted as harassment or stalking, by happenstance or otherwise). Hopefully that's acceptable to you; after tonight's little drama, I have a hunch you were planning on self-imposing such a condition in any case. Feel free to let me know if you have any further concerns or questions in this regard. Luna Santin 15:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Explanation of an edit
I was testing User:ais523/votesymbols.js; Image:Votesymbols.js-enhanced SfD.png shows what it should look like. The script passed that test fine, but it seems to be glitching on something and I can't figure out what it is. Anyway, I needed that text to appear somewhere for the tests, so the history of the Sandbox seems like a reasonably harmless place to put it. --ais523 10:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, haha. Well, thanks for the laugh! Miltopia 10:33, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
re:Hi
I apologise, I was slightly overwhelmed with reverting lots of vandalism and the filter must have picked your edit up. You are correct in removing it from the article. Sorry about that, I'll try to be a bit more careful next time. James086 14:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- That's ok, I was just making sure there weren't circumstances I wasn't aware of, like if the uploader were actually the one who was in the picture (making it ok). Miltopia 14:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)