Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:43, 27 January 2019

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:Plemongello reported by User:Melcous (Result: blocked)

Page: Peter Lemongello (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and The Crests (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Plemongello (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts on The Crests:

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts on Peter Lemongello:

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

A COI warning was given as well as requests to use the talk page to request edits and as well as comments in edit summaries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melcous (talk • contribs)

Blocked both this user and IP 68.169.210.168 for 24 hours for 3RR violation — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 23:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Follow-up: User:Plemongello has just had their account renamed to User:BillyB1950. That editor has clarified that he is not the subject of the article (Peter Lemongello) but is just a fan. EdJohnston (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

The editor, now named BillyB1950, has again broken the WP:3RR on The Crests, re-adding the same content which has been disputed and reverted by three other editors. Melcous (talk) 07:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Pikermerle reported by User:LouisAragon (Result: blocked)

Page

Safavid dynasty family tree (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Pikermerle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "why are you deleting sourced content that I have taken the time to write? I don't understand the hostility"
2. 18:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC) ""
3. 18:34, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "well, the long standing content is based on early 20th century "academia" and was disproven by modern day researchers"
4. 18:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "Everything that I've said is sourced. You have a problem with it, you take it to the talk page"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 18:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing. (TW)"
2. 18:53, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

"Brand new" account (created 2 days ago), trying to change long-standing well sourced content on numerous articles through sheer edit-warring. Even though I and others (@HistoryofIran:) have requested him, on numerous occassions, to refer to the talk page (per WP:BRD and WP:BURDEN]), he does not care at all. Looking at the evidence, in combination with the fact that he instantly removed the 3RR warning from his talk page, I think its safe to say that this account is here on a tendentious single purpose mission. - LouisAragon (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Your absolute first interaction with me consisted in deleting everything that I've written, dismissing it as "historical revisionism" (despite me actually attempting to correct early twentieth-century historical revisionism with modern-day research) and attacking me for being a new user. I only deleted the "warnings" that you posted on my talk page, because you deleted those that I put on yours. I am here to complement outdated and disproven content with new, academically-backed material. Please try to be civil, and don't be of bad faith. Pikermerle (talk) 19:06, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

It appears that Pikermerle has already broken WP:3RR at Safavid dynasty family tree. Their version of the article always includes the unqualified claim that 'the Safavids were sayyids', while the prior version used more cautious language. They have now made this replacement five times, which gives them a total of four reverts. They may be able to avoid a block if they will agree to wait for consensus before making any more edits about the Safavids. EdJohnston (talk) 19:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Unfortunately Pikermerle went on to make a further revert, even after this olive branch. I have blocked for 24 hours. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 22:54, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

What "further revert" and which "olive branch" are you referring to? I stopped editing these articles the moment I received a warning about the 3rd revert rule. The fact that you would block me after I stopped editing the articles and moved the discussion to the talk page is either a stupid mistake or highly ill-intentioned. Pikermerle (talk) 23:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Gutterball1219 reported by User:Moxy (Result: blocked)

Page

Venezuela (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Gutterball1219 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 05:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880077753 by CharlieNgo2002 (talk) Last edit claimed to fixed grammar, vandalized information instead"
2. 05:28, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880077256 by Moxy (talk)"
3. 05:17, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880076205 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"
4. 05:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880076064 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"
5. 05:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880075926 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"
6. 05:12, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880075825 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"
7. 05:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880075691 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"
8. 05:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880075582 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"
9. 05:08, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880075367 by Knowledgekid87 (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 05:30, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Disruptive editing. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

• Talk:Venezuela#Disputed Presidency

Comments:

Ongoing talk this editor has not engaged in

Rebuttal:

• Ban me, you cowards. Gutterball1219 (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
• Blocked Gutterball1219 and Knowledgekid87 for clear 3RR violations — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

User:AZSH reported by User:Wikaviani (Result: Both blocked)

Page: Ras el hanout (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: AZSH (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 14 january, 02:40
2. 15 january 01:24
3. 15 january 02:19
4. 15 january 03:01

Four reverts within 25 hours 10 days ago, and now :

1. 25 january 01:40
2. 26 january 00:19
3. 26 january 01:23
4. 26 january 01:30

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: and several other users warned AZSH in recent times :

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: , , , , etc ...

Comments:

This user edit-warred against another user some 10 days ago (see the above diffs) with 4 reverts within 25 hours, now he's edit-warring against me, with 4 reverts within 24 hours and refuses to give a legit explanation for his removal of sourced content. Moreover, he told me that "they don't need me" for the thread, thus refusing to engage in a constructive discussion : . I would welcome the eye of an admin in order to stop the disruption caused by the reported editor. Best regards.---Wikaviani 02:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

User:103.204.87.39 reported by User:DBigXray (Result: Protected)

Page

Jagdish Tytler (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

103.204.87.39 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 05:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Restore last good, no BLP vio"
2. 05:20, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880230474 by DBigXray (talk) notable event relevant to investigation details"
3. 04:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880207862 by Kautilya3 (talk) I hear you are tag teaming and has no prior history here but WP:BRD.."
4. 16:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 880034627 by DBigXray (talk) no consensus for this"
5. 16:13, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "remove undue information per talk page, a CBI statement needs no separate section"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 23:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC) "/* Undue weightage to the accusations and removal of the subjects statement */ re"

Comments:

This IP user is showing WP:OWNERSHIP issues and repeatedly reverting to his preferred version of the article. He has thrice removed reliably sourced content citing frivolous reasons and has twice restored WP:BLP violations (poorly sourced statements attributed to a living person) DBigXrayᗙ 06:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• This IP is clearly a sock of somebody or other, not to mention the clear WP:personal attack in the diff 3. What do they mean by "I hear". Hear from whom? They have no prior interaction with me. (By the way, the subject, Jagdish Tytler, is in the news. Plenty of people with "no prior history" would be watching this page.) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
• I also notice that the IP has requested full protection of the page, repeating the same ridiculous WP:aspersions naming me, and then did a revert: 05:32, 26 January 2019. A clear effort to game the system. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
• Also It would be interesting to know how this IP and Qualitist reached this page in the first place, immediately after I edited it, and only to revert my edits. (diff, diff, diff)--DBigXrayᗙ 15:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Page protected – 3 days by User:Oshwah. EdJohnston (talk) 17:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

The IP 103.204.87.39, who has certainly made a lot of reverts, has opened a thread at WP:BLPN that may be of interest. EdJohnston (talk) 17:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Indygirl15 reported by User:-sche (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page: Emma Sulkowicz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Indygirl15 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: the user's first instatement of their version / "she" pronouns (in a bio of a person who uses "they" pronouns)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

10. (continued edit warring even after being warned on their talk page by me and by another user)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: warned by me and by another user

Comments:

Clear case of WP:NOTHERE (and DIDNTHEARTHAT)? -sche (talk) 06:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

The comment here is a clear indication that the editor intends to continue with these edits, as they have. Meters (talk) 06:15, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours and warned of discretionary sanctions. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:51, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Damonshady reported by User:RhinosF1 (Result: Blocked per SPI)

Page

Jean Wyllys (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Damonshady (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 12:19, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Check the talk page"
2. 12:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "What are you talking about?? And why are you reverting to a version full of typos and outdated information? Nothing new was added so no need for sources!"
3. Consecutive edits made from 11:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC) to 12:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
   1. 11:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Previous revert was disrespectful to people who spent time making good faith, productive edits. No reason to revert at all!"
   2. 11:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Wording"
   3. 11:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Repositioning // This section still need some work done in order to achieve a neutral point of view"
   4. 11:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "/* Controversies */ can someone more experienced fix this section? It gives to much weight to one side and doesn’t have sources"
   5. 12:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "/* Controversies */ fixed typo"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 12:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Jean Wyllys. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Invloved in large dispute with User:Coltsfan - has been reported to SPI by them. RhinosF1 (talk) 12:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

I refuse any involvement in sockpuppetry and I’m sorry if I violated any rule. I made good faith, productive edits and this guy is reverting me for no reason! Can someone be reasonable and check my contributions? I have no intention at all to disrupt Misplaced Pages. I didn’t add any new information that requires a source. I even tried to get reasonings from him but nevertheless, I’m being accused of using multiple accounts? I’m not even pov pushing, I don’t have any agenda! Just tried to contribute to WP but it seems I’m not welcomed here. Actually I don’t even care about being blocked, I just ask you please to check my edits and decide for yourself if they’re disruptive. --Damonshady (talk) 12:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• Already blocked at SPI as a sock. GAB 16:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Coltsfan reported by User:RhinosF1 (Result: Page protected)

Page

Jean Wyllys (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Coltsfan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 12:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "changes made ignoring or extrapolating the sources; WP:OR and WP:DISRUPT"
2. Consecutive edits made from 11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC) to 11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
   1. 11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "non constructive changes that don't agree with the sources or don't have any"
   2. 11:14, 26 January 2019 (UTC) ""
3. 02:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 12:08, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Jean Wyllys. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

As per my report a moment ago - this is the other user invloved. RhinosF1 (talk) 12:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

@RhinosF1: Three changes were made by me (only two being me reverting someone, no 3RR here) and then things were taken to the talk page. You even put in the diffs there that were about spacing in the paragraphs, not changes in the content. That's hardly a EW, under any light. Coltsfan (talk) 12:39, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

You seem to be trying to discuss but I've added information on yourself to allow the full case to be seen. RhinosF1 (talk) 12:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Page protected – 5 days. EdJohnston (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

User: 1Goldberg2 reported by User:NewsAndEventsGuy (Result: indef)

Page: Greta Thunberg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 1Goldberg2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

• Bold edit and WP:BLP violation in which ed changed Greta Thunberg from saying she's a "climate activist" to a "climate prostitute"
• 1st re-revert to restore "prositute"
• 2nd re-revert to restore "prositute"
• 3nd re-revert to restore "prositute"
• 4th re-revert to restore "prositute"
• 5th re-revert to restore "prositute"
• Other vandalism, not 3RR shortly after the last diff above user changed first sentence of the lead at global warming to "Global warming is fake..."

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning and Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Due to the vandalism and BLP vio I did not bother issuing a 3RR notice before filing this report. I did, however, leave a DS alert about Climate change on the user's talk page. I don't think they have any contribs after I left the DS notice. DONTBITE is great when inexperienced users make oopsies but this case presents abundant objective evidence of bad faith, so I skipped the handholding. After posting the DS alert, this user added an inflammatory comment in this thread (see below, or if it later disappears see DIFF here). NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• That was not mistake. I politically attacked this disgusting left for her lies. And there is no global warming--1Goldberg2 (talk) 13:07, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely I can't see that as anything but a severe BLP violation and simple vandalism. Blocked until they can return to rationality. Kuru (talk) 13:29, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

User:Ljuvlig reported by User:Ktrimi991 (Result: Blocked)

Page

Accession of Macedonia to NATO (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Ljuvlig (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 20:16, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "It's not balanced having two pics saying "fuck", "kill" nato, atleast one pro and one con if a of the photos is gonna be up."
2. 15:54, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "It's no idea to threaten by writing on my talk page, you are changing your story, first you say a majority are against then you say some are, based on what? Nothing, no sources, just cause you feel that Nato isn't good for Macedonia doesn't mean grafiti is acceptable."
3. 15:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Where are the sources that you say are true, that the majority are anti-Nato. The Wiki text says otherwise."
4. 15:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "No they are not, it says a bit further up that "NATO membership in general is supported by 85.2% of the population." This is anti-nato propaganda. And makes the article not neutral."
5. 15:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "Not relevant, graffiti from some random person(s) shouldn't take up the articles points."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 18:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC) "/* Pics in article */Cmt"

Comments:

• Made another revert . Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:48, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Blocked – 24 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 06:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring
• Misplaced Pages:Edit warring