| Revision as of 19:00, 6 February 2019 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,206 edits →Accession of Macedonia to NATO: 4 days← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:37, 14 February 2019 edit undoResnjari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users27,438 edits →edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''4 days''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> Continuation of the same edit war for which you were back in January. You have already made four reverts of the article on 6 February. You removed the last edit warring notice from your talk page and then reverted twice more. ] (]) 18:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC) | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''4 days''' for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. </div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> Continuation of the same edit war for which you were back in January. You have already made four reverts of the article on 6 February. You removed the last edit warring notice from your talk page and then reverted twice more. ] (]) 18:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC) | ||
| == edit warring == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. | |||
| Points to note: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew -->] (]) 11:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:37, 14 February 2019
edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Resnjari (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
3rr
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Resnjari (talk) 15:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Ljuvlig reported by User:Ktrimi991 (Result: ). Thank you. Ktrimi991 (talk) 20:38, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring at Accession of Macedonia to NATO
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 06:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Accession of Macedonia to NATO
Regarding that article, best discuss on the talk page. Do not give too much importance to details though. Ktrimi991 (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Continuation of the same edit war for which you were blocked per AN3 back in January. You have already made four reverts of the article on 6 February. You removed the last edit warring notice from your talk page and then reverted twice more. EdJohnston (talk) 18:59, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Accession of Macedonia to NATO; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Resnjari (talk) 11:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)