Revision as of 15:37, 18 February 2019 editLlywelynII (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions90,637 edits note← Previous edit |
Revision as of 16:06, 18 February 2019 edit undoLlywelynII (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions90,637 edits reviewNext edit → |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
--> |
|
--> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:* <s>On it</s>. — ] 15:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)<br><br>] ; barely long enough (~1900 elig. chars.); ]; (there are only so many ways to express the idea "at the end of"); initially thought that "five years ago" in sources and the 2004 date didn't line up, but this is all from ten years ago so it's fine. Numerous grammatical mistakes in the article and even several in hook above, but they're fixed now.<br><br>'''The problem is''' that the hook is very cute but '''(a)'''{{nbsp}}doesn't really reference the page name or the song itself in any real way ({{sc|]}} ''and'' '''(b)''',{{nbsp}}however unintentionally, ''endorses'' the racist secessionist/segregationist idea at the center of the controversy. The South ''will '''not''''' rise again the way the people who ''say'' that phrase originally meant it.<br><br>If the admins here ({{ping|BlueMoonset}}, {{ping|Yoninah}}, {{ping|SMcCandlish}}, et al.) are fine with this kinda Trumpbating, everything else in the article is fine and good to go. {{ping|EEng}}, am I being a stick-in-the-mud? or is this not funny enough to be worth the squicky tagline? — ] 16:06, 18 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
:* On it. — ] 15:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
|
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |