User talk:Morton devonshire: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:31, 17 November 2006 view sourceSeabhcan (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users7,216 edits →Daniel Pearl ← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:55, 17 November 2006 view source Junglecat (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers6,570 edits →Daniel Pearl: replyNext edit →
Line 46:		Line 46:

	::::::::Oh, but pushing Mo-ty's buttons is so easy and fun. You should try. Its addictive. ] 21:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		::::::::Oh, but pushing Mo-ty's buttons is so easy and fun. You should try. Its addictive. ] 21:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
	:::::::::So this means you admit that you are trolling?] <small>]/]</small> 22:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		:::::::::So this means you admit that you are trolling? ] <small>]/]</small> 22:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

	::::::::No. I'm calling Mo-ty on his biased edits. When I do that he ignores my point and choses to be distracted by my misspelling his name (which is childish - few people ever spell my name correctly yet I take the time to answer their questions anyway) So, Morty, any hope of you explaining why a comment by the US government on an event in Pakistan is acceptable while a comment by the Pakistani government is 'undue weight'? ] 22:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)		::::::::No. I'm calling Mo-ty on his biased edits. When I do that he ignores my point and choses to be distracted by my misspelling his name (which is childish - few people ever spell my name correctly yet I take the time to answer their questions anyway) So, Morty, any hope of you explaining why a comment by the US government on an event in Pakistan is acceptable while a comment by the Pakistani government is 'undue weight'? ] 22:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
			:::::::::First, knock off the insults. You are not accomplishing anything. Second, with your confrontational attitude, I wouldn’t deal with you at all. You got off to a bad start on this one. I wouldn’t keep this harassment up if I were you. Cheers. ] <small>]/]</small> 22:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:55, 17 November 2006

Mad Dog Devonshire's talk, please sign your posts Friday 27 December
2024 12:29 UTC Talk Archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Conspiracy AfDs

What is Cruft?

CruftKilling 101

WikiStuff

Jonesites

Inner Socks

Egad!-io

Mumites

This user is a member of the Counter-Propaganda Unit

This user likes getting friendly notices.

Mad Dog Devonshire's talk page

Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.

This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Morton_devonshire.

Wikimedia Foundation

Contents

Ganser's Work Written With Both Eyes Closed

See this book review, where the reviewer easily discredits the so-called scholarly nature of propagandist Daniele Ganser's work.

Take a look at Roland Rance

I tagged Roland Rance with a db-bio, but someone removed it. I am considering an AfD. The subject just does not seem notable. He chaired a meeting that looks like it was attended by a couple dozen souls at best, another source doesn't seem to exist anymore, and one source is an online petition. He has had a collection of his pamphlets published. I don't think this qualifies for the CT board, or I would have posted on the talk page there. What do you think? If he is truly notable, it isn't established in the article. Crockspot 21:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Another list of pages

User:Rhobite/9/11 watchlist

Tom Harrison 14:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

General Motors streetcar conspiracy - more cruft for you. Have fun. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 12:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Daniel Pearl

Whats up Monty? The President of a country where a thing happens says something interesting on that topic and you call that "undue weight". Its one sentence. Do you think that the President of Pakistan is a 'conspiracy theorist'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

First, that sort of thing may belong in the Musharraf article, but here (in Daniel Pearl) by itself without examination it is undue weight. Second, my name is not 'Monty' -- if you wish to shorten it, call me Mort, Morty, Matt or MD. Lastly, please refrain from personal characterizations such as "obsession" -- it's not appropriate on Misplaced Pages to make ad hominem attacks. I know you have been warned about this before -- I do not wish to bring an Rfc or Arbcom case against you -- I think they are mostly ineffective. Instead, I will just ask you politely here to stop making insulting comments towards me. Thank you.

Morton Devonshire 20:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

You are very sensitive to criticism, Mo-ty, but I don't 'attack' you. I am sensitive to your attacks on wikipedia content. If you believe the comment by the president of Pakistan on the case is 'undue weight' why do you leave the next comment which states, "The U.S. Government believes that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed conspired in the kidnapping." Is this not equally unweighted? Or do you think everything your government says is gospel? I will remove this statement also for the time being. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 20:51, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Say it with me: "Morty". I know you can do it.

Morton Devonshire 21:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

How about Devon Mortonshire? Feel like answering the question yet? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 21:12, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Baloney, this looks like borderline trolling. Just thought you ought to know. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 21:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree. Thanks for your support. Mo-ty needs to learn to put his fanatical nationalism to one side when he edits. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 21:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Here, I am not "supporting" you - especially since you cannot have a discussion without attempting to push someone’s buttons. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 21:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Oh, but pushing Mo-ty's buttons is so easy and fun. You should try. Its addictive. Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 21:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

So this means you admit that you are trolling? JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 22:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

No. I'm calling Mo-ty on his biased edits. When I do that he ignores my point and choses to be distracted by my misspelling his name (which is childish - few people ever spell my name correctly yet I take the time to answer their questions anyway) So, Morty, any hope of you explaining why a comment by the US government on an event in Pakistan is acceptable while a comment by the Pakistani government is 'undue weight'? Lord Seabhcán of Baloney 22:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

First, knock off the insults. You are not accomplishing anything. Second, with your confrontational attitude, I wouldn’t deal with you at all. You got off to a bad start on this one. I wouldn’t keep this harassment up if I were you. Cheers. JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 22:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)