User talk:AZSH: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 01:28, 26 January 2019 editWikaviani (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,564 edits WarningTag: 2017 wikitext editor ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 15:57, 28 February 2019 edit undoAZSH (talk \| contribs)159 edits →February 2019
(22 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== February 2019 ==
	] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ].

			] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> ] (]) 23:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
	'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->
			:], you better stop trolling and lying and go back to the discussion.--] (]) 00:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			::Please focus your discussion on the content of the article, not on the character of other editors. —''']''' (]) 00:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			::: the discussion about the article should be in the article's talk page not here. thanks --] (]) 00:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

			<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been ''']''' ''']''' from editing for ]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ].</div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the ], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx\|" code. -->{{tlx\|unblock\|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}.  ], ], ] 01:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=Your reason here ] (]) 01:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC) \| decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
			*the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, <u>or</u>
			*the block is no longer necessary because you
			*#understand what you have been blocked for,
			*#will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
			*#will make useful contributions instead.

			Please read the ] for more information. ] ]] 06:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)}} the user M.Bitton has refused to participate in the discussion. --] (]) 01:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			:: the user ReconditeRodent has proposed a version which was accepted by me and refused by M.Bitton--] (]) 01:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			::: ] can you give your opinion about this here please? were your proposals at the end really serious? --] (]) 01:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

			{{unblock reviewed \| 1=] All My blocks were on the same article, if reverting the edits made in the article is causing problems then I won't edit it again but as admins you have to make sure that the other editors are participating in the discussions which was not the case in that article. I have asked the user M.Bitton on January 30 to revert his edits in the but he has refused to do so or to answer.] (]) 13:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC) \| decline = You (still) have not dealt with the issues of your block and given that you have a history of this kind of editing, your current promises to change cannot be trusted. ] applies - please come back in 6 ,months time with a genuine reflection on your behaviour and block and we can re-consider. ]] 14:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)}}
			:] tell me how should I have proceeded in that case please? or what should I do in future cases like that? --] (]) 14:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			::You have, despite two previous blocks for the same behaviour at the same article, continued to edit war. Misplaced Pages is a community - we edit collaboratively, not disruptively. In future you should follow ], particularly the 'D' element - discussion. Use the article talk page to reach consensus. ]] 14:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			::: I have asked the user to revert his edit in the because there was no consensus but he refused to do so or to answer for more than 25 days. --] (]) 14:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
			::: ] any answer? if the other user refuses to discuss then what should you do? --] (]) 15:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:57, 28 February 2019

February 2019

There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. M.Bitton (talk) 23:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

M.Bitton, you better stop trolling and lying and go back to the discussion.--AZSH (talk) 00:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Please focus your discussion on the content of the article, not on the character of other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

the discussion about the article should be in the article's talk page not here. thanks --AZSH (talk) 00:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AZSH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here AZSH (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui _水 06:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

the user M.Bitton has refused to participate in the discussion. --AZSH (talk) 01:07, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

the user ReconditeRodent has proposed a version which was accepted by me and refused by M.Bitton--AZSH (talk) 01:08, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

ReconditeRodent can you give your opinion about this article's discussion here please? were your proposals at the end really serious? --AZSH (talk) 01:17, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

AZSH (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yunshui All My blocks were on the same article, if reverting the edits made in the article is causing problems then I won't edit it again but as admins you have to make sure that the other editors are participating in the discussions which was not the case in that article. I have asked the user M.Bitton on January 30 to revert his edits in the talk page but he has refused to do so or to answer.AZSH (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You (still) have not dealt with the issues of your block and given that you have a history of this kind of editing, your current promises to change cannot be trusted. WP:STANDARDOFFER applies - please come back in 6 ,months time with a genuine reflection on your behaviour and block and we can re-consider. Giant Snowman 14:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Snowman tell me how should I have proceeded in that case please? or what should I do in future cases like that? --AZSH (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

You have, despite two previous blocks for the same behaviour at the same article, continued to edit war. Misplaced Pages is a community - we edit collaboratively, not disruptively. In future you should follow WP:BRD, particularly the 'D' element - discussion. Use the article talk page to reach consensus. Giant Snowman 14:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

I have asked the user to revert his edit in the talk page because there was no consensus but he refused to do so or to answer for more than 25 days. --AZSH (talk) 14:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Snowman any answer? if the other user refuses to discuss then what should you do? --AZSH (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2019 (UTC)