| Revision as of 06:19, 21 November 2006 editWknight94 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users89,452 edits +Image:Chaes.jpg with an explanation← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:34, 21 November 2006 edit undoCOGDEN (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,050 edits Temrec.pngNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| :::: is a beauty <I>but</I> I neither downloaded nor <I>copied</I> anything from their site; I created this scan personally. <font face="raphael" color="green">] | <sup>]</sup></font> 05:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | :::: is a beauty <I>but</I> I neither downloaded nor <I>copied</I> anything from their site; I created this scan personally. <font face="raphael" color="green">] | <sup>]</sup></font> 05:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Which makes it no less of an infringement. The original is a copyrighted document; the version posted is clearly an unauthorized reproduction in full. Doesn't matter who did it or whether a copyright notice appeared on the document; if they didn't have a license from the owner to make copies then the copies are illegal. ] <sup>/]/</sup> 05:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | :::::Which makes it no less of an infringement. The original is a copyrighted document; the version posted is clearly an unauthorized reproduction in full. Doesn't matter who did it or whether a copyright notice appeared on the document; if they didn't have a license from the owner to make copies then the copies are illegal. ] <sup>/]/</sup> 05:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::Not necessarily. It might be ]. Obviously, Intellectual Reserve, Inc. is not going to grant permission to use an image of the recommend—don't even ask. But you can often use images of copyrighted forms like this in the English Misplaced Pages for purpose of commentary or criticism. This is a gray area of U.S. copyright law that depends upon a number of factors. One thing for ''sure'' is that the image shouldn't be of such high quality that someone could print it from a color printer and pass it off as a real recommend. ] 08:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| * ] ( · ) from . | * ] ( · ) from . | ||
| **Image has had no copyright tag, then a fair use tag, and now {{tl|PD-RU-exempt}}. The image does not appear to meet the criteria listed in PD-RU-exempt. As for fair use, there is at least one free image of Chernobyl available such as ] which is perfectly acceptable IMHO, but has been removed from ]. —] (]) 06:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | **Image has had no copyright tag, then a fair use tag, and now {{tl|PD-RU-exempt}}. The image does not appear to meet the criteria listed in PD-RU-exempt. As for fair use, there is at least one free image of Chernobyl available such as ] which is perfectly acceptable IMHO, but has been removed from ]. —] (]) 06:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 08:34, 21 November 2006
editImages
- Image:White truck driver Reginald Denny.gif (history · last edit) from Ruy Lopez 01:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Dennis Leeflang.jpg (history · last edit) from . The GFDL caim is bogus per copyright notice on source. Erik Swanson 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Temrec.png (history · last edit) from Intellectual Reserve, Inc. This appears to be a photocopy of copyrighted material. In an un-redacted image of a LDS temple recommend "©2003 IRI" would appear in the lower-right hand corner of the "Signature of member of stake presidency or mission president" box. --FyzixFighter 04:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- A person handed me this card (which was / is folded in the middle); I scanned it on a personal copier. The only areas that I redacted (with PhotoShop ™; they are the areas filled in with black) were those that could identify the issuer and / or the holder of the card; there was no copyright notice on this card when I received it or returned it. This person did not wish to be associated with this image. Could you show an example of what you call an "un-redacted" card to prove that some may have a copyright notice? Remember, around Misplaced Pages, we verify. This is the first and only 'new' temple recommend I have seen in person; back a few years I saw them fairly often, but they were a different style then. If you do a Yahoo image search you can see much clearer examples of this card than what I scanned. Duke53 | 04:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- An example of an "un-redacted" image with copyright notice . For the admin investigating this, IRI can be contacted through information found on this page. --FyzixFighter 05:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- That link is a beauty but I neither downloaded nor copied anything from their site; I created this scan personally. Duke53 | 05:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Which makes it no less of an infringement. The original is a copyrighted document; the version posted is clearly an unauthorized reproduction in full. Doesn't matter who did it or whether a copyright notice appeared on the document; if they didn't have a license from the owner to make copies then the copies are illegal. alanyst 05:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not necessarily. It might be fair use. Obviously, Intellectual Reserve, Inc. is not going to grant permission to use an image of the recommend—don't even ask. But you can often use images of copyrighted forms like this in the English Misplaced Pages for purpose of commentary or criticism. This is a gray area of U.S. copyright law that depends upon a number of factors. One thing for sure is that the image shouldn't be of such high quality that someone could print it from a color printer and pass it off as a real recommend. COGDEN 08:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Which makes it no less of an infringement. The original is a copyrighted document; the version posted is clearly an unauthorized reproduction in full. Doesn't matter who did it or whether a copyright notice appeared on the document; if they didn't have a license from the owner to make copies then the copies are illegal. alanyst 05:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- That link is a beauty but I neither downloaded nor copied anything from their site; I created this scan personally. Duke53 | 05:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- An example of an "un-redacted" image with copyright notice . For the admin investigating this, IRI can be contacted through information found on this page. --FyzixFighter 05:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- A person handed me this card (which was / is folded in the middle); I scanned it on a personal copier. The only areas that I redacted (with PhotoShop ™; they are the areas filled in with black) were those that could identify the issuer and / or the holder of the card; there was no copyright notice on this card when I received it or returned it. This person did not wish to be associated with this image. Could you show an example of what you call an "un-redacted" card to prove that some may have a copyright notice? Remember, around Misplaced Pages, we verify. This is the first and only 'new' temple recommend I have seen in person; back a few years I saw them fairly often, but they were a different style then. If you do a Yahoo image search you can see much clearer examples of this card than what I scanned. Duke53 | 04:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- Image:Chaes.jpg (history · last edit) from .
- Image has had no copyright tag, then a fair use tag, and now {{PD-RU-exempt}}. The image does not appear to meet the criteria listed in PD-RU-exempt. As for fair use, there is at least one free image of Chernobyl available such as Image:Chernobyl2006.jpg which is perfectly acceptable IMHO, but has been removed from Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. —Wknight94 (talk) 06:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
