Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:11, 23 November 2006

Please post new messages at the 0bottom of the list Messages posted at the top will usually be deleted without a reply Sign all posts - see Misplaced Pages:Sign your posts on talk pages - it makes communication clear as to who said what and when.

User pages are not user templates, so they do not belong in user template categories.

Archives /Archive 06/Month August /Archive 06/Month Sep /Archive 06/Month Oct /Archive 06/Month Nov

Nachmansohn article

Hi, thanks for your advice. I'm a first time contributor and I'm having a bit of trouble adding references to the stub; how exactly does one do this? Or is there a useful page to explain it, because I can't seem to locate the details . Also, I intend to write more on Nachmansohn but not until I'm finished with a research project on his life; is it possible that the stub will be deleted before I can add more? Thanks for all of your help, - NatalieM (talk · contribs) 14:06, November 6, 2006

Telegraph

That was quick...I'd only just created the journalist article and I was just about to circle back to deal with disambiguation. Cheers! Ringbark 08:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just finishing for the night, and wanted to knock off some late night vandals creating nonsense articles. I found yours instead, and it's nicer to add to an article than tag them for deletion. For fun I also went to the Telegraph web site and found an intersting item about a woman getting the largest award ever for rape from the estate of a dead millionare. Weird. Night. --ArmadilloFromHell 08:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi Armadillo, could you add your vote on the survey for Beit Hanoun incident as well as commenting. That way we will solve the issue faster. Thanks.--Burgas00 19:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Tulse Hill and Tulse Hill railway station

The problems are well and truly back on Tulse Hill and Tulse Hill railway station. WP:3RR is in danger of being breached on the former and the later is a mess again. I will edit the later but for obvious reasons keep away from Tulse Hill for 24 hours. Regan123 21:25, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Hopefully he will do the 3RR and can be tagged for it. --ArmadilloFromHell 21:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Whilst I don't disagree it would be me getting the ban at the moment!!!! Regan123 21:53, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll revert if I have grounds, such as putting it in Cemetaries -which is bizarre, as is saying someone is a resident of a nearby hill is typical weirdnesssaying someone is a resident of a nearby hill which is typical weirdness. The others are harder, I don't know if postal codes are correct or not. It seems you have only done one revert since my last edit, so it seems open from my POV.

You recently removed a category from the ethnic group category. Please reinstate it. 87.194.35.230 23:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Why would I revert it? - it does not belong in that category. --ArmadilloFromHell 23:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Asthme

You have redirected the french word "asthme" to the wrong acticle. Please direct it to the correct article. 87.194.35.230 01:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I have no ides what you are talking about. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Asthmatics

Your removed "asthma" from "minorities". Do you claim that the majority of people are asthmatics. 87.194.35.230 01:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

No I don't, however, it was not Asthma that I changed but Category:Asthma. ] covers a disease, and does not belong in Category:Minorities for that reason alone, since minorites refers to people. Category:Minorities is clearly for Ethnic minorities anyway. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:45, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Deletionist

What's the purpose of deletionism? Kingjeff 02:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Seems like a loaded question to me; from you user page, I would guess that our styles are directly opposite. My view is that most new pages posted around 1:00am should be deleted; they are generally school kids making nonsense pages, and attacking their friends and teachers. If no one deletes them you end up with a big mess. I also believe that talk pages should not be archived for at least 5 days. --ArmadilloFromHell 03:18, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Angioplasty link

Hi I had systematically removed the new user's spamming of this link to multiple pages as the site failed to give greater detail than that already in articles. I took pity though with this final link in ] as the site's webpage seemed substantial and does have rather nice pictures :-) That's a very weak keep vote - what do you think ? David Ruben 04:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Funny, I was testing an AWB script when I noticed his links, so I decide to run it, but by the time I changed the parameters and started processing, you had changed all but that one - fast typing! I let it do that one, as I thought you just had not got to it. I'll revert back - I think they were all done in good faith, not typical link spam. --ArmadilloFromHell 04:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Hsu Hao

I noticed that you put a db-empty tag on the article Linda is a child molestor, but I'm curious if you looked at the page history. This user is a persistent vandal (see: ] especially her "contributions" to the talk page for User:Undergamed). She needs a very severe warning about continuing in this manner, considering that she already received a persistent vandal warning from User:Merope (which she keeps removing). Just thought you'd like to know. ---Charles 15:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes it's marked empty, because at the point of warning it is, but based on the page title, a warning was issued, + some others, and now I'm about to ask for a block. --ArmadilloFromHell 15:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick action on this. Was I mistaken in assuming you are an administrator? ---Charles 15:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

No - not an admin, just an agressive vandal fighter. Take a look at his page for the final warning. --ArmadilloFromHell 15:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, admin or not, you do great work. I just looked at the page, and was glad to play a part in seeing this vandal done in. Cheers! ---Charles 15:48, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Good catch on reverting his talk page blanking, and the whole incident was very fast, he's blocked permanently. From his attack article creation to blocking less than 10 minutes. --ArmadilloFromHell 15:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

It really bothers me when I see someone blanking their own talk page in order to remove warnings they have received. I really got into it with an editor who claimed he had the right to remove such warnings. Of course, they are always there in the history, so it makes little difference. In this case, a user who had no intention of making any constructive contribution is blocked, and I am a little happier. Thanks! ---Charles 15:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Me also. There used to be a standard warning tag for it, it was removed a month ago, reinstated and removed again. There seems to be a conflict between those who think that warnings should not be removed, and those who think that once a warning has been issued and read, the user may delete it. The problem is that when you go to a talk page that is empty of warnings you think the user is clean and issue a level 1 warning and it defeats the whole purpose. The counter argument is that it's in the history, but that's a whole a lot of extra work. --ArmadilloFromHell 16:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I am in complete agreement with you on this matter. I am aware that there are serious differences of opinion amongst editors and administrators on this issue, but there should be some way of moving forward on this. It is simply strange to me that one would want to create so much more work for other editors and administrators---the warnings should remain on the talk page for reference. ---Charles 18:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

The hippos

I am not sure if they are a hoax or not but they are probably almost certainly non-notable. The group of articles that have been created are unencyclopedic and gossip/myspace in style. Vandalism is just extra. MRSC • Talk 22:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

dmoz

Hi,

I recently added a link in dmoz article pointing to a page rendering how dmoz once looked like (newhoo). You deleted this link, the comment said no proof. Well, all I can tell is that I found this page on the personal site of Rich Skrenta, the founder of newhoo that became dmoz later. So I think this information is secure enough, however it's up to you to decide whether it deserves to be replaced on dmoz article or not. Have a look at and look for "What NewHoo once looked like" string. It indeed points to . Regards. (17 Nov 06) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.220.48.77 (talk • contribs)

Go ahead and repost it with the appropriate references attached - I don't guarantee someone else will not delete it. --ArmadilloFromHell 02:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

List of Argentine Jews

That wasn't a personal attack.. i was just laughing at a funny nickname

Next time, try to be a little more inteligent and do not censor like a tyrant.

--Killergon2 04:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

I see you just don't get it, tone of language is important in Wikpedia, look carefully at the words in the post you just made. It's not the correct way to speak. --ArmadilloFromHell 04:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

It was just a comment at the discussion section... i didn't touch the original article... therefore, you censorship is truely ghey.

--Killergon2 01:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

General Loser

When you say "the submitter", do you mean me (who tagged it as a hoax) or the article's creator? Per WP:HOAX, hoaxes aren't speedyable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

No, sorry if I was not clear - I meant the article's creator, he removed the speedy delete tag that I put on it, and I warned him, but I guess I forgot to put it back in place. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:58, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Ah, right. I'm with you now. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleted Page: Apex

I am not sure why you deleted the page I was working on. I was trying to document the company I work for which is an emerging company with a very unique history. The reason stated was "blatant advertising" when I was merely documenting what this company does and what the affiliations were. Unfortunately, I am new to this thing and did not keep a copy while working on it, and poof! it was gone. I think you could have at least read the article without bias before you removed it! Thanks for listening. --Rwphan 19:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Just for the record I don't delete articles, I don't have that power. What I do is tag articles that probably should be deleted. If I tagged it as blatant advertising, that's because that is what it looked like to me. If the site is no longer there, that is because an administrator agreeed with me and deleted it. I do read articles before I tag them. There is a difference between an article that provide factual infomation about a company, and one that soudns like blatant advertising. And you should note that company articles even when written correclty are not listable unless they meet the definitions provided in WP:COMPANY even if the company is legitimate. I own a computer consulting company, it has a long history and a good record, but nevertheless it is not listable in Misplaced Pages. --ArmadilloFromHell 00:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

re Alec - U.K.

I'm confused following your posting to the WP:AN/I re User:Alec - U.K.. Myself, MRSC and Regan 123 all then added comments, but as far as I can tell, no admin commented on this and instead its been time-guillotined and transferred to archive see 147 here - So now what is to be done ? David Ruben 01:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I just noticed that same a hour ago, it's very frustrating. On the other hand, since that was posted, neither account has been any posts. I suggest we keep an eye open for any changes by him, or the use of another account or IP address and report immediately on Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism - I still do not know if it a sophisticated vandal playing games, or someone who had some severe comprehension difficulty. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

He's back. See . Regan123 19:49, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

I think we may have an issue with this edit. Do you think it is enough to list a complaint? Regan123 20:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Reported at Misplaced Pages:Administrator intervention against vandalism --ArmadilloFromHell 22:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for all your help. Now back to adding things! Regan123 23:39, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

So what happened to the AI/V ? (that page does not seem to have any archive once an admin clears items from the list). Alec is back switching "asthma" to the redirected term of "asthma attack" and now querying whether diabetes is a disease or not on multiple pages. Also unenecyclopaedia "What asthma is not" section added to asthma. I'm coming to conclusion whilst has knowledge on the topics, is just trolling and being disruptive. I've posted a fresh item to WP:AN/I, see WP:AN/I#Disruptive actions of Alec U.K. David Ruben 21:24, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree, for a while I had some pity on him, as a possibly disabled person who was trying to do his best. I have now concluded that it's a big game to see what he can get away with. I noticed within a few minutes that he was back, and have reverted a few obviously bad edits. --ArmadilloFromHell 00:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Happynoodleboy

There seems to be some funny business afoot with this fellow. If he has changed his name to Tim1988, which seems to be the case, why is he still making edits under the other name? And why are all of his edits vandalism/attack pages? He is need of a very stiff warning, and told to pick one name or the other, and have the one he does not pick deleted. What do you think? ---Charles 06:31, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Very strange - I would think the redirect is not allowed. The recent vandalism is also strange - I just posted in WP:AIV --ArmadilloFromHell 06:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

It is very strange, and I am quite perplexed. Tim1988's comments here, and on my talkpage have only increased my confusion, quite frankly. I cannot find your listing on the WP:AIV page. I will check back in with you later, and see what progress has been made. Right now, I have a play to work on... Thanks for your time and efforts on this matter, I hope we can figure out what happened. ---Charles 18:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks?

Could you please clarify where I have made personal attacks? I take my editing very seriously and would never attack anyone. Also, I did not create the page Sam hewitt nor did I leave any comments on the said page. Awaiting your reply. --Tim1988 11:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Confusion

There seems to be some confusion here. User:Happynoodleboy was my old username, which I had changed to User:Tim1988 through the relevant Misplaced Pages page for doing so (see here). As far as I can recall, I have not used that account (Happynoodleboy) since and I do all of my editing through User:Tim1988.

I did redirect User:Happynoodleboy to User:Tim1988 so that other editors would recognise that I have changed my name.

I have checked the contribs for User:Happynoodleboy and I see "No changes were found matching these criteria".

I'm not ruling out that the old account might have been compromised, but I see no vandalism edits made there myself and I certainly wouldn't vandalise myself. Can you please explain what the problem is here? Much appreciated. --Tim1988 11:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Since you have no history of vandalism and IP addresses have been hacking your page, it looks like someone has the password to your account and was creating attack articles. Since the articles have been deleted, you can no longer see what was done. I suggest you change your password. As far as the old account linking to the new, I was not sure that was allowed, it just added to my confusion. --ArmadilloFromHell 18:57, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

I have no idea how, but it appears you are right, the old account has been compromised. Although I haven't used the account since I changed to my current user name, since it's now under someone else's control, I've removed the redirect that linked that account with my current user page. Perhaps I should request to have the other account blocked if that is possible. Either way, thanks for informing me of the situation. --Tim1988 20:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, it looks like this has been sorted out... or, at least, the problem has been diagnosed, yes? Now, the solution? Blocking the old account seems the right idea. ---Charles 23:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

New user page moves

Your right, new users cannot move pages. One user is claiming four days, but it might be based on number of edits. Cheers! ^_^ --ElectricEye (talk) 12:45, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Your report at AIV - Before you ask

I removed your report of 69.179.43.203 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) even though it is likely the same person as Eddyhaskel. If they can wise up and start to make good contribs, good for them; otherwise we can always deal with them later. Secondly, still warn them with test1-4. ;-) Kimchi.sg 01:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, I added it as an afterthought just as a note and should have mentioned that no warnings had been issued. Just in case he comes back on the IP address, I have now tagged it with warnings. --ArmadilloFromHell 01:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Dwayne yuen

You said on User talk:Lboy349324, "Please do not post your own resume on Misplaced Pages." Worse - he was posting someone else's resume with the name changed! The bulk of the article was copied from the bio of one Dwayne Bryant. Lboy was doing this last night too; now I've blocked him for it. FreplySpang 05:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for telling me that. I wondered why he got blocked so quickly. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Cancelled projects

Hey, buddy, I hope you have "thick skin" because I think you were a quarter-hour too early on your speedy deletion tag. I wasn't finished typing everything in when you stopped by.

Also, what do you think of moving it to Project cancellation? --Uncle Ed 15:38, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

In this case, I agree, but in fact I removed the speedy tag about 30 seconds before you posted your message. The whole point of speedy tags is speedy, I generally post speedy tags within less than a minute of creation, it's not possible to tag articles for maybe delete and then come back 15 minutes later to see of they got better. Rule #1, is create your article in a userpage sandbox, and don't post until it's ready for primetime. --ArmadilloFromHell 15:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tag removal, and regarding at least 75% of projects are cancelled LOL I intend to cite Steve McConnell's book which reports research statistics supporting a 50 to 55% figure. But maybe his sources were counting projects which actually got started. I'm in the stages of proposing a project right now. If they change their mind before I start work, was it "cancelled"? ;-) --Uncle Ed 15:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm counting projects that I actually worked on and got paid for. e.g.

• a six month project where the non-tech guy who provided me with support left the week the project was finished, and no one ever installed my system into production, and the owner of the company (who whined evry time I invoiced him)) a year later was not aware that he paid me for nothing.
• an IBM software development project where 20 people worked for nine months, and the project was cancelled, because another IBM lab had been working on exactly the same project
• a three month employee resource application that solved problems the branch had been having for two years, cancelled because the main office decide they could do it better (and of course they did not)
• an application to automate and convert text documents to web pages, cancelled because the manager was technically dense and could not understand that it could be automated,a dn save tens of thousands of dollars, and decided to do the whole thing manually. etc. etc. --ArmadilloFromHell 15:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

You could be a co-author of Project cancellation, then. Anyway, when I do my next round of edits I'll let you know; your feedback will be valuable. ^_^ --Uncle Ed 18:51, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The Bosco School Vandal

dude, do u have a life? i mean come on or is wikipedia your life? do you sit at your computer anxiously awaiting someone to post something bad on wikipedia just so you can delete it? just read the don bosco prep article i was putting up, its funny, its just a joke, i go to bosco and i think its funny — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bosco1209 (talk • contribs)

Yes, actaully I have a very full and productive life. Now let me ask you, why would you take the trouble to create an account just to vandal a school page with a flag representing one of the most evil creations the world has know. Do you not have a life? Do you not have any goals? Is life so thin and bitter for you, that this is how you spend your evenings? --ArmadilloFromHell 02:23, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Breasts

Hello, Excuse me but I am trying to accomplish something that doesnt fall under the degree of vandalism, and I believe you would appreaciate it when I do complete the transfer of data that i am trying to accomplish without being interrupted by warning spammers.

The Invalid image was obviously not placed on purpose, rather than continuing to threaten me, try being resourceful and helping. Thank YOU!... — Preceding unsigned comment added by THEBLITZ1 (talk • contribs)

Sorry, but when your changes have been reverted several times, and you have been told not to change the picture wihtout reaching consensuse, and you post a link to a non-permitted image, it's vandalism. Stop practising on the article and use the sandbox instead. If you do it again, I'll ask for a block on your editing. (and please learn to sign your messages) --ArmadilloFromHell 06:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)--ArmadilloFromHell 06:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

It looks like the images added by User:THEBLITZ1 have already been deleted, but as a heterosexual male I can confirm that they were lovely -- and completely inappropriate as the lead for that article. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 06:45, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

So I gather. Voyeur that I am, I tried to look at the image, but when I found it was gone, I reverted the changes. And I just reverted another image by him in another article, that was very nice, but also completely inappropriate. --ArmadilloFromHell 06:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Were there multiple images? I only saw one, a lovely young lady drenched in water; took about 0.5 seconds to decide to revert it. I couldn't tell if he uploaded any other images because all of his other links were to nonexistent files. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 06:54, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

No, it was not there and not a flesh picture - but in another article and it very looked wrong - I checked the history and it and it had already been reverted once - so I reverted again there. Looks like a stolen image anyway, so I'm going to have to trace it's real source. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Excuse me I had only 1 image, as i listed. And If a picture of Breasts, are inappropraite under the category labeled "breasts", then I implore you keep up the great work! — Preceding unsigned comment added by THEBLITZ1 (talk • contribs)

Please learn to sign your posts (and stop uploading unlicensed images) --ArmadilloFromHell 07:35, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

How do you search the Internet for an image?

"Image:Architect148.jpg is directly copied from http://abcwallpaper.free.fr/800archit.htm" -- how did you find it? -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Just searched for the name in Google Images, normally it's not so easy. I've caught image violations before but it usually required a lot more work, and I don't have the patience. It's now listed in Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree images under November 22. I have no tolerance for copyright violation - so I think I will be adding a couple more tomorrow. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

have fun! lol silly boy...

and remember to review or search copywright infringement because that image could be termed "freeware" since it has no listed owner and is available on the site for external use as well as the word free being listed in the link itself. Have a great time! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by THEBLITZ1 (talk • contribs) .

D'oh! I thought maybe you had some way to search images.google.com for an actual image. Didn't occur to me that he hadn't even renamed the file. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

THEBLITZ1

Already blocked for 24 hours: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:THEBLITZ1.

Since I suspect that a large number of the images uploaded are bogus labelled, I think it should be permeanent. He's gaming the system. --ArmadilloFromHell 18:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

You don't buy the "I, the creator of this work" licensing note for Image:Logo44.gif? :-) It's possible that Hanlon's razor applies here, but he's uploaded a lot of images and ignored multiple copyright warnings, so yeah, you gotta wonder what's up. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 19:10, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

repeated removal of warnings

Can you recommend a procedure for when an editor repeatedly (1st, 2nd) removes warnings from their Talk page? This user has a history of deleting others' comments, or cagily rearranging them, despite being advised several times not to do so. It makes them hard to review in abuse situations. — edgarde 00:21, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Agree, let me know if it happens again. --ArmadilloFromHell 00:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you much. I didn't know how to preceed. — edgarde 02:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Eric Rhoads

What do you think should be done with a completely self-promoting article like this one: ]? I almost tagged it db-spam, but that did not seem right, and db-bio does not work, because there is a claim of notability. But, it is vanity and self-promotion, and articles of this kind make me sick. This is not the purpose of Misplaced Pages. Your thoughts, Mr. Armadillo? ---Charles 04:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Agree, it looks very much like a copyright violation, but I can't prove it. So I tagged it. Can't speedy delete since he is notable. It's not acceptable as is, it should be rewritten and cut down to one fifth of the size, feel free to do that. --ArmadilloFromHell 04:24, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply. You must have posted this just minutes before I went offline for the night. I will take the scissors to it, and see if I can't find something worth keeping. Spamvanertising really gets on my nerves... I wish I could have found a speedy category that fit. Oh well... Time to do some real editing. ---Charles 18:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm sure someone tagged one of his other long articles with a spam tag, and it seems to have gone, but I don't know which one it was.

FYI

-- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 06:02, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I'm well appear of that, and normally would let it go, but in this case, since he threatens to come back and since I tagged some images for speedy deletion, I'm just leaving an audit trail. (And boasting that I found where the images were bootlegged LOL) --ArmadilloFromHell 06:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok, have fun! I actually didn't realize that he was indef blocked; I just checked the log a few minutes ago and noticed that Glen's patience had run out. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 06:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

It's also a safe excercise in dealing with bootleg images, at least he can't complain. I've reverted all his edits, but was not quite perfect, in one case I reverted and image that was legitimate and not uploade by him. --ArmadilloFromHell 06:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Please Support Me

Please support my writing in Asher Heimermann. People are trying to delete information on Wisconsin's only student politician in the state. Your support would be nice! Asher Heimermann 07:05, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I responded to User talk:Asher Heimermann. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:16, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I shoot down articles left and right every day, and have no mercy, because most of them deserve it as being spam, scrap or scam. But sometimes, I just want to stay out of it. Assuming the whole article is not a hoax and the author is a nice guy, then I don't want to be the nasty, it almost certainly deserves deletion, but I'm staying neutral and not voting. --ArmadilloFromHell 07:40, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I just can't bring myself to pile on to that AfD debate; I have to respect a 13-year-old who takes an active interest in politics: http://www.cox2008.com/cox/early_presidential_campaign_organized_in_13_states/. -- Jim Douglas _(contribs) 07:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

User:THEBLITZ1

I would say: revert the articles, so the original images are included so there's no holes when his ones are deleted. - Mgm| 08:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. All reverted already, except one, where there was no image, and I could not find grounds to revert. --ArmadilloFromHell 14:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Bosniakophobia -- the article is under construction

Do not delete articles that are under construction.. You have no right to vandalize and suggest articles for speedy deletion when I started the article just 5 minutes ago. Bosniak 21:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)