| Revision as of 23:19, 28 November 2006 editZacheus (talk | contribs)351 edits →Right to vanish← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:23, 28 November 2006 edit undoMike Rosoft (talk | contribs)Administrators67,164 edits Reverted threat etc.Next edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| == Right to vanish == | == Right to vanish == | ||
| Please, read ]. Thanks. -- ] 23:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | Please, read ]. Thanks. -- ] 23:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Do you even read your talk page? == | |||
| Update: The ] has only prohibited the user from contributing on Czech Misplaced Pages ("... se zcela zakazuje přispívat do české Wikipedie po dobu jednoho roku"), making this case probably moot. I haven't found any concrete evidence of his disruptive behaviour on other projects. (I'll inform you should I find some.) - ] 15:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : You should already known that no ArbCom has a power beyond its own project. It's logical since otherwise it has to elected by people from other projects as well. -- ] 22:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::Agreed, unless the arbitrators (etc.) of other projects choose to enforce the ruling. (Note that I am not asking it to be imposed on you on English Misplaced Pages - as of now.) - ] 23:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : No, they may not. If you tried, for instance, to impose decision of the Czech kangaroo court here (which I would strongly welcome), I would have a right to due process by '''this''' ArbCom. | |||
| I will have to ask other sysop to civilize you and prevent you to make 3RR. -- ] 23:19, 28 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:23, 28 November 2006
MissWikiGirl
You just blocked MissWikiGirl for a week for spamming, after one warning ({{test1}}. This seems a little harsh; the links were added in good faith, and I was emailed after the warning with a polite query about why the links were considered spam. I forgot to do this, for some reason: 80.189.237.91 05:51, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sure looked liked spam to me, so I'm not sure why the quick unblock, you might also like to look at the edit history of 66.245.23.115 - to see more spam --ArmadilloFromHell 07:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, it may look like spam because I was adding links in one sitting, but it wasn't meant to be that way. I took the quote from the main page "the 💕 that anyone can edit" literally, not realizing that if you add a lot of links that it might be viewed as spam and be frowned upon. I appreciate being unblocked since I did not receive advance warning and did not realize I was doing anything that might be considered malicious. I just wanted to point people to free images that related to topic articles. I saw others doing it and thought it was okay. My apologies. (Sorry, but I don't know how to sign this correctly.) MissWikiGirl
Calton, Glasgow
Thank you for pointing out the copyright issue, I assume the text I transferred into the page was ok since it was cut and pasted from an existing Wiki page "Calton" and I had no reason therefore to doubt it legitmacy. GoldenMeadows 11:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
TetraSoft
Why do the admins keep deleting the article entitled TetraSoft? This company is very significant, at least in the North Georgia area, and has even been featured/recognized on a national level many times.
Consider this article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Delicious_monster
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? It's short, to the point, and is about a company in a similar field. Why don't you delete it too?
At first, I suggested Mr. Davis create the article about his company, and it was deleted. Then I (Sheila Rae) created the article, and once again it's been deleted. Your guidelines and policies are unfair. I'm a journalist and work for a very large national news publication. I will most certainly publicize Misplaced Pages's actions in this matter. Your administrators are rude, careless, and abuse the "power" they have been given.
If you insist on not allowing the article "TetraSoft", but keep the article "Delicious Monster", I expect a FULL EXPLANATION as to why. If you do not respond, someone from the agency I represent will most certainly contact Misplaced Pages's administration as part of the story we are preparing. Perhaps someone with more authority than yourself (or the previous people who have deleted this article), would be in a position to better explain your organization's actions.
Eric Trump
Thanks for your help with the 2nd nomination bit! Optimale 13:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Am I a vandal?
Hello. Could you please explain me the reason of not deleting e.g. Stade Malherbe de Caen redirect and reverting me like a vandal with the button? Thanks, -- odder (T.W.K.) 16:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Cornered Rat Software
Hello, I was one of the contributors of the Cornered Rat Software page that you removed on Nov 10th. I'm wondering if you would be able to provide a reason for the deletion and recommendations on how the second attempt could be more successful. Thanks DocVM 11:12, 12 November 2006 (AST)
User:MikeRowesoft
User:MikeRowesoft < -- Just created (and blocked). What do you think, coincidence? Glen 09:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Meta T Pilot Project Page
The META-T Pilot Project page was deleted without any warning at all and without indication of why it was deleted. We understand why the Iridium Pilot Project was deleted and will find another home for that, but the Meta-T page was well populated with information and linked to legitimate documentation on the topic. Could you please re-instate it (or do we have to log an entry at Misplaced Pages:Deletion_review?) and give advice on how to improve it? The discussion page was being used by contributors and we have no record of what has occurred now that it has dissappeared.Hjviola 08:46, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Can you please recreate the article and discussion page, long enough for retrieval of the information contained? Thank you Hjviola 12:33, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Namhto
Thank you for your quick action in regard to this guy: ]. I wrote to another administrator about him, but you acted more quickly. What a menace! ---Charles 23:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
definition of the term "band vanity"
i'm curious as to what the term "band vanity" means, at least in the context of wikipedia terminology. Gringo300 06:20, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
FourthAve
FA's last known edit is from the IP 67.1.121.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) on September 23, 2006. If that counts as evasion, his ban timer should now be set to September 23, 2007. Scobell302 20:18, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I require your apology
In the page Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nácek Ignácek you publicly accused me being known vandal and you intentionally breached my privacy. Since you were probably misled by User:-jkb-, I ask only your public apology at that page. -- Zacheus 21:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
I require your apology too, Semenáč
In the page Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nácek Ignácek you publicly accused me being known vandal and you intentionally breached my privacy. You wrote there that you will apologise me, if it isn´t true. I ask only your public apology at that page or at discussion at my userpage. --Semenáč 12:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
I have a few questions about the deletion of the flare magmus page
1. Did you read the discusion page on it?
2a. If yes, did you even bother to give me a chance?
3. Did you read about my self implimented time limit?
2b.If no, why not?
4. Why did the page get deleted, exactly?
I am trying to get these stories that I have made out to the public. There are so many movies that are just remakes I just can't help but create these stories, as the world is in grave need of good stories.
If it is possible, please put the page back up. I said i would continue working on it until it was finished, and i want to be able to follow through on that.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you for bringing thins to my attention. I did not relize such was true.
Removed speedy
I could not find history showing Cherie (actress) went through Afd but I can see the 3 deletions which is why I tagged it as a repost. Maybe I am missing something though.--Dakota 16:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Yahushua
The author does not believe the AfD was correct and recreated the article again (without sources). What's my course of action right now? Place a recreated tag on his talk page? ColourBurst 23:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Please, restore my barn star
See . Thanks. -- Zacheus 22:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Right to vanish
Please, read meta:Right to vanish. Thanks. -- Zacheus 23:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)